Intimacy Lite, A Product Not Worth Buying
“Your bones have been my bedframe and your flesh has been my pillow. And I`m waiting for sleep.”
Ani DiFranco
Em & Lo recently answered a letter from a reader where they coined the term Intimacy Lite. You know what Intimacy Lite is. It’s what you’re getting from your Pretend Boyfriend. Girls find it very confusing when guys remain technically uncommitted, but act all mushy and romantic during a hookup. Of course, they could just ask him and find out what they need to know, but girls are reluctant to initiate the Define the Relationship talk in the beginning stages of hooking up. Which is understandable. It’s awkward, and guys often roll their eyes about girls and their “need to talk.”
In the absence of a frank conversation, how do you figure out if he is getting attached emotionally? You can’t, not if he doesn’t verbalize his interest in being committed. Here are behaviors that women commonly interpret as demonstrating real feeling for them:
- Spooning
- Affectionate caressing and petting after sex
- Non-sexual kisses: eyelids, forehead, tip of nose, fingers, etc.
- Snuggling during sleep
Many guys engage in these intimate behaviors in the moment, but pull back in the light of day.
Here are some excerpts from the original article by Em & Lo: Dear Em & Lo: He Says He Just Wants to Hook Up But Doesn’t Act That Way
“If you’ve ever spooned your booty call or held hands with your one-night stand, you’re familiar with intimacy lite. If both parties are fully onboard with the lite nature of the intimacy, it’s perfectly natural – everyone needs a cuddle sometimes, and even the most ardent commitment-phobe among us misses snuggling and nuzzling.”
“Commitment-phobes (i.e. 99.9% of male college students) are especially prone to indulging in intimacy lite, and this often sends a mixed message, because if his mouth is saying one thing and his body is saying another, then you’re probably going to listen to whichever message you like best. To make a sweeping generalization (Who, us? Never!), men are most often the culprits in cases of misinterpreted intimacy lite, perhaps because they dominate the ranks of the commitment-phobic.”
Kelly, a writer at College Candy describes her experience with Intimacy Lite:
Boy explains, “I will be moving soon, and I am afraid to get serious because I could easily see myself falling for you and don’t want that to happen.” I think about it, and decide that this little obstacle isn’t worth losing him completely, so why not continue to hang out while he’s here. Over the next few months, I see boy multiple times a week, he calls me on the phone every day, and we start becoming more and more relationship-y, but all the while he is insisting he doesn’t want anything too serious. His words were saying one thing, his actions the other. Or were they?
As easy as it was for me to tell myself, “sure, he says he doesn’t want anything serious, but he acts serious, and actions speak louder than words, right?” I am starting to rethink that. It seems that what I have here is a case of Intimacy Lite. He doesn’t want anything really serious – none of the real obligations or expectations that come with actual relationships – he just wants a lighter form of intimacy, some one to commiserate with about bad days or lay in bed with and cuddle on a lazy day.
Here’s her bottom line:
Pros: I get good sex, a fun dinner companion, and someone to listen to me bitch about a bad day. I have all the perks of a relationship without the overwhelming anxiety about him being “the one.” I don’t have to stress about how good of a husband and father he’ll be when he’s hugging the toilet after a long night, because I know we’ll never make it that far.
Cons: We’re not in love and never will be. We’re not going to get married. Am I wasting my time dating someone with no future? What if I miss out on someone I truly fall in love with because I’m half-waying it with this guy? What if he meets someone he thinks he could fall in love with and drops me? Basically, what if I get hurt?
Here’s my bottom line:
1. I don’t really see the upside. Sex is easy to come by, why save yourself for a guy who’s just not that into you? Your gf’s will listen to you bitch while assuming the role of fun dinner companion every night of the week.
2. And the downside’s a killer. The way I see it, there are two major risks with Intimacy Lite:
- A broken heart
- Missing out on someone really great because you are “half-waying it” with someone.
Obviously, the worst case scenario is being hit by these outcomes simultaneously. Intimacy Lite is high risk, girls. And it’s probably low reward.
Are you experiencing Intimacy Lite with your Pretend Boyfriend? Thoughts on how to cope?
Related posts:
Well, crap! Maybe I am
Oh no, I'm not trying to mess anyone up! There's a difference between intimacy in the early stages of a relationship, and intimacy lite that doesn't have anything real behind it. Does that make sense?
It does make sense – but it does make it difficult to discern the two. I mean does he (ahem, no one in particular) feel like we're in the early stages of a relationship or is he just enjoying his dose of intimacy lite? The only way to know is to ask – and oy vey!
You said it. The only way to know is to ask. Makes me wish for the days when fathers asked young men what their intentions were, shotgun at the ready. But seriously, I think a guy who is open to commitment will show signs of that from the beginning, whereas a guy who is looking for “lite” will keep it at a superficial level as time progresses, and will seem less predictable and reliable overall. I think with those guys, you feel less secure and do a lot more wondering about what they are thinking.
Why do I feel like the only BOY who is experiencing Intimacy Lite with a girl? The tables are always turned in my relationships. *sigh*
Whenever I come across a guy who is relationship material, dating a girl who is not, I want to cry for the terrible waste of it. While it's true that most commitment-phobes are men, I do hear from women who are fiercely independent and have no interest in having a relationship, at least for now. I guess I would ask you: are you drawn to feisty, assertive, independent women? Or even women who are emotionally reticent? I think you need to say what you want and see if she's down for it. If not, what's the point of halfway-ing it? I can assure you there will be a lot of women thrilled to find a guy who is interested in more than a hookup.
Hmmmm. I might be an intimacy light-er. Because I want intimacy but not a serious relationship. But I would be really honest and upfront about it. And as long as you're honest and you both want/need the same thing, I don't see a problem with sharing intimacy with a friend.
But at the same time, I know what its like to pine away for an intimacy-lite guy.
I guess there is a difference between experiencing intimacy-lite when you're clear that you're not really looking for anyone and using intimacy-lite to fill the gaps until you find the person you're looking for. One could be a really sincere friendship and the other is more like using or being used. Hmmmm.
I agree with you, Singlutionary. It's all about being on the same page. No shortcut, I'm afraid. Communication is the only way to determine this. That's the hardest part sometimes.
I guess it only goes to show that the only thing to believe is when BOTH their words, AND their actions are congruent, all the rest is just a fallacy. However,as stated, we have the tendency to listen to whichever message we like best.
Communication is the key in every relationship no matter what level, however, in order to have totally honest communication, you have to be willing to show your vulnerability, and in order to show your vulnerability , you have to have trust. Therein lies one of the biggest problems with these types of relationships, in my opinion. They are center around dis-trust, in one form or another, rather than trust. Therefore, we end up lying to both ourselves, and the other player, in the game of “fill-in”, in order to keep from being dis-qualified.
Searchingwithin, your game metaphor is perfect. Women tell me all the time they don't want to be in a “one down” position, which is understandable. I think they hate it that they must resort to jockeying for position, reclaiming the upper hand, etc. And you're right, it's pretty hard to establish trust if you have no idea whether someone likes you, who you really are, or just wants to have sex with you.
oh god, I think I'm a victim of intimacy liteHe just wanted to spoon all night on our first night together and hasn't called in 2 days…although he responded to an sms I sent the morning after. erk.
Hey confused, thanks for coming by and leaving a comment! First, take a deep breath. Sounds like this is a new guy, so don't jump to any conclusions. Here are my immediate thoughts:
1. Wanting to spoon all night could be a good thing. He may be trying to take it slow, not rushing into sex before both of you are ready.
2. Spooning is awesome, and if you've found a guy that is into it, you're fortunate!
3. Not calling for 2 days is not significant. Not calling for 2 weeks is.
I think you really need to relax, because being anxious about the relationship so early will turn him away from you. Just give it some time to see what develops. Don't expect the worst — know your own worth. He would be lucky to have you, so make sure he figures that out for himself!
I'm thinking perhaps that you don't see any upsides because you have close gf's that will fulfill the dinner date and whinge at role . What about we lonely creatures who have lots of “friends” but not any who have the time for us most weeks?
Even we who have close friends that still don't have the time because they are running businesses and relationships and social commitments for their lives as well?
Sometimes I get to the point where I think anything is better than nothing if I enjoy their company . And if I know it's not going anywhere I'll just have to deal with it when it ends because a distraction and affection is what I need to keep going .
It's funny though .
Without being conceded , I know I'm a very attractive woman because I'm reminded of it all the time . Old ladies at the grocer . Casting agents and stylists.
And I know I'm a very kind hearted person. I'm friendly and I'm intelligent .
But it seems never to be enough .
Why is that?
I don't sleep around but I'm not a prude and most people I've dated aren't even close to being in the same friendship groups or communities so it's not because I've been labeled “easy”.
The fact is , most attractive men largely ignore me .
I get a great deal of attention but rarely from anyone not trashed or sleazy or just unsanitary ….
Do you have any suggestions as to why this may be?
Hey, taylor, welcome to Hooking Up Smart. Of course I can totally relate to the idea of anything being better than nothing. Hell, even an unrequited crush is better than nothing. It gives one something to think about.
If you know that you are a very attractive woman, and you are being ignored by guys, that makes no sense. And yet, I hear this alot. Especially in the hookup era, many men will view you as a sexual conquest, nothing more. They're more interested in hooking up with you and reporting that to their buddies than in actually getting to know you. It sucks. Very attractive women are objectified more than anyone else.
Hey, taylor, welcome to Hooking Up Smart. Of course I can totally relate to the idea of anything being better than nothing. Hell, even an unrequited crush is better than nothing. It gives one something to think about.
If you know that you are a very attractive woman, and you are being ignored by guys, that makes no sense. And yet, I hear this alot. Especially in the hookup era, many men will view you as a sexual conquest, nothing more. They're more interested in hooking up with you and reporting that to their buddies than in actually getting to know you. It sucks. Very attractive women are objectified more than anyone else.