Redditors on Casual Sex

October 26, 2011
I came across a very interesting thread on Reddit. The poster is male:

Has anyone else had casual sex and realized it wasn’t for them? 

I’ve had a few one nightstands and – most recently – an acquaintance that I hooked up with… and it’s occurred to me that casual sex doesn’t work for me. I mean, it’s fun to have but afterwards I feel like “blah”.

Maybe it’s because I’ve never had a mind-blowing good time, or maybe it’s because I enjoy having a girlfriend, I don’t know.

Anyone else feel like this?

Reading the comments, I was surprised at the number of comments from men saying it really doesn’t work for them. I went through and tallied up the numbers as best I could:

 

  Female Male  ?
Like Casual 5 6 2
Dislike Casual 16 25 3
Prefer FWB 4 6  
Pro-Poly 1    

 

A few guys expressed that it’s better than nothing, so they continue to have it when they are not in a relationship. Only a couple of people on the thread have not had casual sex and would appreciate the opportunity.

The comments from the women who like casual sex were particularly interesting, and in keeping with my belief that a small minority of women are just wired differently:

tangledlight 

If casual sex with the same person involved cuddling (fucking LOVE cuddling), I would never want to have a boyfriend. I want to be able to ring someone up, have a good night and some cuddles, and for them to go home the next morning without drama. I have someone I currently do this with … or would more often, but he sucks and doesn’t like driving out my way often, since I’m without a vehicle.

J973

Nah. I love sex with my husband, don’t get me wrong, but I could have been a hooker, as far as my feelings towards sex/emotions anyway. I completely do not need emotions with sex. I just need physical attraction and a bottle of liquid courage.

Pannanana

I had a period in my life where all the sex I was having was casual.

Context: Late junior high until my early twenties – had two significant relationships in that time frame – all the rest were one day/night stands. During that time, I also came out as a lesbian to my whole family, and was celibate by choice for 2 years.

I didn’t really know what I was doing, I was just… having sex. Yes, I did get pregnant. The very first time I had sex, I was 13, and got knocked up.

I had a FWB from 8th grade until right before soph year of high school, taking time out for my first significant relationship.

Currently, I am in a 5 year long relationship. Been swinging for 2 years. Half-open relationship for a month or so.

ssnakeggirl (F)

I enjoy casual sex, but it seems that most people don’t. If you don’t think you will like it then don’t do it. Do whatever works for you :-D

CaptainHooker

The one-night stand with strangers, I got that kind of “bleh” feeling because it felt cheap and nasty. But having a fuck-buddy…I found it was the best thing for me. I don’t do relationships, or commitment and that stuff, not right now because of my own personal issues I haven’t quite worked through, but still want sex…It really is just a personal thing. I’m a female and I hate the relationship, cuddly commitment stuff.

Swiftysmoon

I’m still not sure how I feel about it honestly. My boyfriend and I have played with the idea of an open relationship and swinging because of our personal views on sexuality. I didn’t necessarily dislike it, but it wasn’t amazing either. I did learn that I’m really good at not letting it change my relationship with someone, since we’ve really only done any swinging with people we know and trust.

Here are some interesting comments from the guys: 

lemur84 (M)

Yup. One night stands are great for an hour or so (longer if you count the build-up, where you are the conquistador and she your coy strumpet) but I tend to feel horrible the next day. Devoid of even lonliness or ennui.

Doesn’t stop me doing it though. I like to touch vaginas, y’see.

ryanman (M)

I’d love to see how many people agree with you (and me). I was so excited about casual sex, but for the most part it’s been severely underwhelming, sometimes during and almost all the time afterward.

Shandd (M)

I’m a dude and I’ve done the exact same thing. Lately that is all I’ve been getting was casual so i’m working on it, but it is super tough. 

ARDad (M)

Before I met the woman that is now my wife, I had some one night stands, and some one FWB relationship. I found that, without exception, sex is just…plain?…without any emotional feelings attached to it. It’s something that is hard to put into words, those of you that know the feeling, back me up on this. It just feels more intimate. 

YoohooCthulhu (M)

Ehh, it can be good in the right situation. I won’t say I seek it out (like most people, I think a casual/FWB thing is more comfortable), but I’m not dead set against it, and I’m sure it’ll happen again. Atypically, all the experiences have been fairly good sex/positive–it’s just that they were with girls that I wasn’t particularly into as people who got entirely too intense afterward :-/

basilobs (M)

Yep. This is me. I feel filthy if we’re not seriously into each other.

FlintsDoorknob (M)

I really wish I realized it sooner. That never works out. For me, the fact that I don’t have someone exclusive to me, or really cares about me really messes with my head. I have casual sex with a friend, but I regret rushing into it.

IM_ON_A_ZEPPELIN (M)

Casual sex is so meh. FwB is slightly better, but I’d rather have a meaningful FwB, i.e. a relationship.

The Pensive (M)

I’ve done the casual sex thing a little bit, and I completely agree with you.

It was…nothing special for me, because half the fun I get out of sex is making the woman that I’m with feel really good. I can’t make myself give as much of a fuck about that if I’m just doing it with someone I don’t care very much about, and as a result I care less about the entire activity.  

Stevenj214 (M)

I’ve had a lot of casual sex and it doesn’t work for me either. It’s pretty much just a slight step up from solo masturbation. Sex with someone I actually like and respect is a thousand times better!

SenseiSparky (M)

yup….but that doesn’t mean i wont keep trying if i get single again.

thebope (M)

A lot of times if I have sex with a girl I don’t care about I’ll just cum really quickly. But if its a girl that I’m absolutely infatuated, well… lemme just say, it goes a lot better because I actually want that girl to feel well you know? Its not some random I don’t care about and just want to cum in

MrFuddlesworth (M)

I’m right there with you. (Little Back story) Im a 23 year old male and I never really got in to the whole casual sex thing. I had a girlfriend from high school all the way till Junior year of college. Then hooked up with one girl my senior year. After that I had a girlfriend after I got a job for a little over a year. We broke up and I’ve been single for about 8 months now. Hooked up with one of my neighbors causally but just never really got into it.

I know for me I’ve noticed that I seem alot more confident in the bedroom when its with someone I care about, rather then someone I’m just fooling around with. Plus your right with the whole afterwards thing, usually its an awkward just laying there for a few minutes then one of us being like “welp, good game. see you next time.” After a few times, even though it felt good and was pretty decent sex, I gave up on it cause I decided it just wasnt for me. Me and my right, or on special occasions left, hand are doing quite fine looking for ms right currently. fingers crossed for both of us eh? 

FrankieWalrus (M)

I don’t really feel sexual attraction properly until I know someone well, so were I to initiate sex with a stranger it’d be pretty horrendous. 

Tralan (M)

I’m like this. I use to man-whore it up a long time ago when I was younger. Not because I was particularly horny, but mostly because I was trying to be cool. I mean, it was cool to be getting laid… but afterwards I was still single, lonely, and as you said, none of it was mind blowing. I did have a FWB for a while, and it was cool. She was a great person and I enjoyed hanging out with her as much as I liked fucking her, but because that’s all it was: either friends, or fucking, but no intimacy, it got stale. As sappy as this sounds, I like being with someone. It makes the sex so much better when I care about her, and she for me. And, I like spending time- both friendly and (non-sex) intimate- with a person.

Now that I have neither, however, I am totally willing to bang a random chick for just a little companionship cries in the corner

doctorsound (M)

It beats no sex, that’s for sure. But, at least for me, it tends to get emotionally messy really quick.

swishcheese (M, original poster)

It beats no sex for sure – which is why I still do it here and there.

Brandon91245 (M)

Yeah the moment she brought her other boyfriend over and preceded to kiss him in front of me. Felt emotionally sick for a long time after that.

And that’s how I discovered that casual relationships don’t work for me.

darkotter (M)

I wholeheartedly agree with you here. In fact it’s got to the point where I some girls have started undressing because they assume that I must be up for casual sex, and I have just refused.

Having said that, like other people here, I have had better experiences with FWB style things, if you are specifically looking for sex without a girlfriend. Other than that, I quite agree, I would much rather have a girlfriend.

 ackmon (M)

For me casual sex is sometimes better than masturbation but often not.

trashed_culture (M)

I think it has to be with the right person. It can be very difficult to find someone who is mutually attractive, but not serious SO potential.

I’ve had some bad FWB and some great FWB. I’ve never had a one night stand either, but I’ve ‘dated’ women who I realized too late that I just wasn’t interested in. No wonder the sex wasn’t that great.

xix_xeaon (M)

If all it is is pure physical sex, then I enjoy masturbating way more, and it requires much less effort too. I really don’t understand why other guys put in so much effort to have “just sex” with girls – they must be really poor masturbators.

Having sex with an other person is all about the intimacy for me, and for that to work it has to be with a person I know and like. Also, for me FWB and GF kinda flow into each other.

The female responses were pretty much what you’d expect – it doesn’t work for most:

lazysundae (F)

Casual sex with the same person is great. But the thing is, I always end up developing feelings for them, which, 100% of the time (for me), doesn’t get reciprocated. :(

wickedtinkygirl (F)

I had one guy I planned on having a casual thing with, or even just a one night thing….yeah almost 5 years later we are still together :) I guess casual doesn’t work for me either

statusisnotquo (F)

Every casual sex experience I’ve had has left me feeling mostly unsatisfied. The sex is pretty consistently mediocre, especially since it seems like most guys don’t really care if their one night stand gets off, too. Plus, I’m way too much about the emotional closeness of the experience. Casual sex is just physical, and it just doesn’t do it for me. I’ve had a couple good experiences, but not many.

Meeeeh (F)

Yup, my feelings exactly. But then as a long time single person, the pressure to ” get some” every so often pushes me to do it again, only to go back to square one :-/

jennaraetor (F)

Casual sex isn’t for me. I don’t like the feeling of, “I don’t like you enough to call you tomorrow” or “I wonder if he liked me enough to call me tomorrow”. I’d rather wait until I give a few emotional fucks about a person to decide if we should give each other a physical one.

JaneRenee (F)

I have a couple times. Each time I ended up trying to make a relationship out of it. I wasn’t comfortable with it being casual. So I just don’t do it anymore. :)

thisisnotmyrealsnyo (F)

I completely agree. I’ve been doing the casual sex thing for a while now, and it’s better than going without, but I feel like when there’s no emotion there, the experience is so much more… routine. It’s like – ok now we’re making out, here comes the foreplay, etc etc, but when you’re with someone you care for and really respect, every little thing has significance – finding out what their breath sounds like hitched in their throat, discovering that they like to be kissed behind the ear or on the neck or back, coming across little physical quirks and scars and birthmarks and inexplicably finding all of them sexy or adorable. The experience is so much more heightened and fulfilling to me.

adelaidelaide (F)

I already know it isn’t for me. If there’s no intimacy and commitment with the man I want to sleep with, it’s impossible for me to get into it. I’d make the most terrible hooker.

taratara (F)

Only times I’ve had casual sex have been pretty unfulfilling, mostly because one or the other party develops feelings the other party doesn’t. 

apetts13 (F)

I feel the same way. Its fun until after then I feel like its not worth it.

heatb0t (F)

I totally agree. Half of my number was recurring, relationshipy sex and half is casual sex. Casual sex has its place and usefulness, but overall it’s pretty blah. It pales in comparison to sex with feelings involved. 

Two thoughts:

1. I continue to be surprised, and encouraged, by the number of men who prefer relationships to casual sex.

2. If it feels like crap, stop doing it.

  • Ramble

    If it feels like crap, stop doing it.

    One Question:

    • How did those guys feel the day after they struck out?

    I prefer relationships to casual sex myself, but that does not mean that some slight loneliness after a ONS means that the ONS was not enjoyed.

    Something else, I think, should be mentioned. I, personally, see a lot of White Knighting on Reddit. Granted, considering their likely audience, this is not surprising.

     

  • Ramble

    Just some quick math:

    • 16 of 26 girls disliked Casual (61.5 %)
    • 25 of 37 guys disliked Casual (67.5%)

    Though, again, being Reddit, I am not sure how representative this survey is.

  • Valentin

    I continue to be surprised by the number of men who prefer relationships to casual sex.

    Really says alot about the view women have of men. Also says alot about how much you overvalue your emotional capacity and depth in relations to males.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Really says alot about the view women have of men. Also says alot about how much you overvalue your emotional capacity and depth in relations to males.

      Yup, guilty as charged. The last few weeks have been a real eye opener, and I’ve been writing and reading about this stuff for three years. Imagine how surprised the average young woman would be.

  • Abbot

    encouraged, by the number of men who prefer relationships to casual sex.

    and of course those men prefer relationships with non-casual-sex women

  • jack

    Reddit is, I’m sure, full of more techie girls and I would expect a greater number of higher-T you-go-girl types and such.

    Also, guys who are Like Flypaper for Poon probably are not on Reddit.

     

     

  • Abbot

    Really says alot about the view women have of men

    Well, it really has a lot to say about the female casual sex cultists who want to believe what makes them feel better or have their heads stuck up in some apex fallacy

  • Wayfinder

    If it feels like crap, stop doing it.

    Oddly, this is one thing the modern world doesn’t seem to understand.

  • Abbot

    If it feels like crap, stop doing it.

    Oddly, this is one thing the modern world doesn’t seem to understand.

    If it did, there would be a lot more marriage-qualified women

  • PBateman

    It’s a nice thought, just stop doing it. Like some of the commentators said, “it’s better than no sex” or ” the pressure to ” get some” every so often pushes me to do it again”.

    Sounds like people are lowering their standards out there just to get some. Why not raise your standards and focus on that?

    For me, casual sex really is not really that much more than a release for a guy. What else could it be? Sometimes it’s utterly painful….those times where you and the girl are playing tug of war until the bar closes…then you’re drunk…by the time you get to sleep it’s 5am…you wake up the next day hungover and feeling like utter poo. That was my last one night stand and I’m not sure I really care enough to bother with that. If it really is just some kind of urge or ego boosting I need, why bother?  There are more productive uses of my time.

    The chase is fun…but I’d rather just go home at 1am and get some decent sleep. If I see the girl again, cool. If not, then she has some major issues in my mind and isn’t worth my time. Very rare that I end up with a girl in these situations that I like anyways. I like them even less after seeing them all sloppy and hungover the next day, without knowing anything else about them. Not a good way to earn respect.

  • Ted

    It is interesting that the percentages for women and men that are NOT into casual sex are pretty closely aligned.  Of course, it is a small sample and not representative in general, but it is curious.  And both in the 60% range.  Almost aligns with the 20/80 concept…

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Ted

      It is interesting that the percentages for women and men that are NOT into casual sex are pretty closely aligned. Of course, it is a small sample and not representative in general, but it is curious. And both in the 60% range. Almost aligns with the 20/80 concept…

      Ha, I had the same thought. I do agree though, that the sample is small and Reddit is atypical. High IQ, high tech, more men than women I believe. In view of that, I thought it was interesting that nearly all the guys have experience with it and seem to have the option, but likened it to masturbation. The women’s responses were more what I’m used to seeing – most don’t do it, don’t like it, with a few exceptions where women say they hate cuddling, or something of the sort.

  • Pode

    If it tastes like crap, and you’re starving, you still eat it.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Pode

      If it tastes like crap, and you’re starving, you still eat it.

      Yes, that’s why most of the guys said it was definitely better than nothing.

  • Ramble

    If it tastes like crap, and you’re starving, you still eat it.

    Actually, it is more like enjoying that donut you just ate but soon lamenting the brick that it has become siting in your stomach.

  • Ted

    Perhaps different people have very different levels of “starvation” then.  The longest I’ve been without sex since I lost my virginity was about 10 months, give or take a week.  It was frustrating, but I took all the pent up desire and directed it towards other things.  I will tell you that when it started to become a distraction for me, I also found that I was ready to start looking for another LTR, so I’m not sure if that may be chicken and egg for me.

    I’ve always wanted LTRs, so I have never really gone for long periods of time without a partner, and because of that never went without access to sex.  Of course, I admit that perhaps my desire to look for and keep LTRs is partially driven by the need for sex, but it certainly isn’t the only factor, and I do not let that need change my other behaviors when I have it.

    So I guess its easy for me to say “if it doesn’t feel good, don’t do it” because I haven’t spent much time without.  But I feel OK with tossing in my two cents anyway, because it seems that if access to sex long-term is your goal, my experience tells me that LTRs are the way to go.  The problem is that some people seem to feel that a LTR is too much hassle, or that they are not “ready” for commitment.  My take?  Why does it have to be a hassle?  And how will you ever BE ready if you never try?  Instead of using casual sex as a band-aid, try forming real, committed relationships and see where they go?  It is certainly MUCH better practice for when you do marry and settle down.

  • Isabel

    Ted, aren’t the percentages of male and female virgins in college the same too? IIRC, the numbers were also similar in the 1-5 partner range too. One of the many reasons I don’t believe those who say young men and women are living in wildly different micro-cultures. And why, oh, why are we still pushing casual sex as freedom when all it does is coarsen the girls and dull the men?! Most people seem to be doing it because others are doing it or because they’ve been told that having lots of sex with people you barely know somehow gives you “sexual prowess”. So much fail.

  • Ted D

    DOH! Sorry.  That last post was me…  Gotta get used to using the new handle…

  • AnonymousDog

    Ted D,

    Do people engage in casual sex because they feel LTRs are ‘to much hassle’, or do they engage in casual sex because the kind of LTRs they desire aren’t available to them? You’ve been able to have LTRs, is that because you desired them more than others, or because they were more available to you ?

  • Will

    I wonder how many of the guys who didn’t like it went out with the mentality of tonight I am getting some no matter what? When ever I have done this it is bad because your standards keep sliding, and you keep drinking and eventually go with someone that you don’t have a connection with because they are willing. On the flip side if you go out to have fun, and then happen to meet someone who you are genuinely attracted to and who is attracted to you it usually works out for me.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Will

      On the flip side if you go out to have fun, and then happen to meet someone who you are genuinely attracted to and who is attracted to you it usually works out for me.

      In that case, would you go for a ONS or might you consider something more with that person?

  • Ted D

    @ Will – that is a good question.  I personally have never gone out with the intention of “getting laid”, so I can’t speak from my own experience.

    I have seen other male friends in action though, and there may be something to your point.  I’ve seen them go home with women and the next day they act like it was the worst thing every.  I ask them why they even bother, and just about every time the answer is “I wanted to get laid”.  If that is indeed the goal, I guess it was a successful night.  But to me, bad sex is worse than no sex any day.

    Bad sex < masturbation – at least when I do it myself I KNOW I’ll enjoy it, and there really isn’t much effort.  Plus, I don’t have to deal with the bad feelings and hard work leading up to the “event”.

  • http://gravatar.com/thethirdway sconzey

    I’d be interested to compare reported sexual behavior in the poll to actual sexual behavior. Hypotheses:

    1. Enjoying of casual sex is under-reported, because women don’t want to be perceived as “easy.”

    2. Many of the girls who report not enjoying casual sex are still having quite a lot of it with desirable but unsuitable characters in the hope it will lead to a relationship/because they are swayed by his manly charms.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @sconzey

      I’d be interested to compare reported sexual behavior in the poll to actual sexual behavior.

      I’m not sure what you mean. This isn’t a formal poll, just a thread someone started on Reddit. It got voted up a lot, and got quite a few comments. I think we can assume that people who voted it up either strongly agreed or strongly disagreed.

      Enjoying of casual sex is under-reported, because women don’t want to be perceived as “easy.”

      Even with online anonymity? Five women were enthusiastic about liking casual sex, and a couple about swinging. And as you say, several admitted doing it and not liking it much. For some women, it’s also better than “starving.”

      Many of the girls who report not enjoying casual sex are still having quite a lot of it with desirable but unsuitable characters in the hope it will lead to a relationship/because they are swayed by his manly charms.

      How do you define many? I didn’t hear that from a single woman.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Maybe things aren’t so bad. Reading these comments from guys makes me realize that most of them are just like me: We want relationship sex. We want LOVE.

    Bad news: I have started treating women badly, and I am amazed at how well it works. It even works on my wife. Had more and better sex with her in the last 6 months of my being an asshole and openly flirting with other women, than all of the previous 10 years of flowers and dinners and foot massages put together. So my turn to the dark side is only accelerating. This is bringing my marriage to an end, which is fine with me.

    Good news: If I ever found a woman who would reward me for treating her WELL, I would ditch my new asshole lifestyle instantly.

    I *want* to treat women well. I ENJOY giving footrubs and backrubs and giving flowers and cards. I LOVE making a woman smile and orgasm. I LOVE moving heavy things for a woman and opening jars for her and rescuing her when her car breaks down. But that doesn’t work, and being a jerk DOES work (don’t tell me it doesn’t because OMG IT WORKS — and flowers don’t do shit. Last time I brought home flowers, the first words out of my wife’s mouth — direct quote: “It won’t work”). But I hate that being a jerk works, because I DON’T LIKE BEING A JERK.

    But maybe not all hope is lost, ladies, because I would convert back to nice guy in a heartbeat if I ever found a woman who could be hot for a nice guy long term. I would be willing to go on many dates without sex, I would be willing to marry again, I would do just about anything. And I am pretty sure that I am the majority of men.

    So maybe the answer, ladies, is to make it known up front that you want to be with a nice guy, and that a nice guy would get just as much *good* sex with you (including blowjobs) as the bad boys get from the party girls, and — here is the important part — MAKE SURE THAT IT IS THE TRUTH. I bet guys would mass exodus the dark side for you if that was the truth. I would.

    Hell, I would cry tears of joy if I could somehow believe in love and marriage again. And I’d bet a year of paychecks that Roissy and Roosh would cry tears of joy too. Even though they enjoy the frequent sex they are getting, they hate the lack of real love in their lives. They say so loud and clear, almost every post.

    On the other hand, maybe this is an impossible situation because maybe the vast majority of women just can’t be hot enough for a nice guy to want frequent *good* sex with him (not just “ok, I’ll lay down once in a while and allow sex to happen because it is my wifely duty” kind of sex).

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Had more and better sex with her in the last 6 months of my being an asshole and openly flirting with other women…This is bringing my marriage to an end, which is fine with me.

      Does anyone else see the irony here?

      make it known up front that you want to be with a nice guy, and that a nice guy would get just as much *good* sex with you (including blowjobs) as the bad boys get from the party girls

      You’ve hit on something here. A lot depends on what guys consider good sex. I believe a lot of party girls have anal sex frequently, threesomes, etc. They welcome a cumshot to the face. Heck, one guy at an Ivy once described here that the quarterback on his team got rimjobs from slutty girls. If a woman has no inclination to behave like a porn star, will men consider that suboptimal sex?

  • Ted D

    @ Turning – well, here is the thing.  If everything I’ve learned in the last 4 months is true, women in general simply do not respond sexually to being treated well.  They respond sexually to the asshole behavior.

    That isn’t to say that you can’t have both though.  Athol’s entire blog is dedicated to finding that balance of asshole and Nice Guy(TM) to keep a marriage happy and healthy.  I’m past the initial shock of it all, and now am trying to figure out “my” correct balance.  Yes, it means I have to act in ways that are uncomfortable for me sometimes.  No I haven’t had to become a complete asshole.

    I’m not thrilled with any of this, but I’ve had a divorce and do not want to ruin another relationship because I am clueless.  That doesn’t mean I will be successful now, but at least I have a better idea of what needs to be done to make it successful.

    Don’t turn fully to the dark side.  It will be a lasting mark on your being for the rest of your life.  Instead, learn to curb your desire to please a woman.  A few of us have discussed how we simply dialed back the Nice Guy(tm) routine a bit and added a little jerk for good measure, and got great results.  You don’t have to sell your soul to the devil, but it doesn’t hurt to play devil’s advocate a bit.

    And I’m sorry to see that you seem to have given up on your marriage.  I gave it all I had before we threw in the towel.  But I was trying like hell to do all the wrong things.  Now that you know, you may have a fair shot of saving your relationship, if you want.  Don’t let your new knowledge creep into your feelings for women in general, and certainly not your wife specifically.  If you look at my posts on other threads here, you’ll see I went through a period of time after taking the “red pill” where I had difficulty keeping my anger and disappointment from affecting my current relationship.  It was very tough, but now I am past it and things are really improving.  She can’t help her nature any more than you can help yours.  Now that you have a better understanding of her nature, you are in a much better position to satisfy her “primal needs”, and in return she will likely be willing to meet more of your needs as well.

    I wish you all the best no matter how things go.  Do your best to not let the negativity of the “manosphere” creep into your heart and soul.  There are some really bitter players out there!

  • Ted D

    @ Susan – I for one do not associate any of the ‘porn’ behavior with good sex.  Good sex for me has much more to do with how the experience felt, how well we connected, how well we “meshed” for lack of a better word.  Do I like the extra spice?  Hells yeah!  My current SO likes to spice things up, and I’m happy to oblige.  But even if our sexual relationship was much more traditional, I would still feel like the sex was great because we connect.  The extra stuff keeps it new and interesting, which I think she enjoys a great deal.  I’m good either way.

    That being said, I can imagine that a man used to women emulating porn behavior may be very disappointed by sex with a wife that really doesn’t enjoy being adventurous in bed.  That to me sounds like a compatibility issue that should be addressed early on in the relationship.

  • deti

    This is more anecdotal evidence that it is women, not men, who shy away from commitment and monogamy.  This is more support for the proposition that women, not men, want NSA sex. 

    My own opinions on casual sex were that it was a bit like a glazed donut.  They taste great while you eat them.  It’s not a steak dinner, but it’s a lot better than nothing.   It’s the feelings afterward that you don’t much like.

  • deti

    “This is more support for the proposition that women, not men, want NSA sex.”

    Or at least a lot more women were down for NSA sex than I previously thought. 

    I was never into expecting a woman to do the pornstar things like anal, threesomes, rimjobs, cumshots, etc, though I do believe that’s more the norm now than it was 20 years ago. I did want some variety in positions though, and BJs are still the best.  Nothing beats a well-executed BJ.

  • Heidi

    I’m in an open relationship.  Both my partner and I LOVE sex.  But we’ve found (over the last year and a half) that we LOVE sex with each other.  Even though we have free reign to have sex with others, we’ve found we mostly like flirting and mess around with other people, but having sex with each other.

    This was incredibly surprising to both of us, given our high sex drive.  But what we found is that we enjoy companionship and sex isn’t really everything.

    Funny, we just had this conversation last week… and we both realized we don’t like casual sex as much as we used to.  Sounds like that’s reflected in this poll.

  • Abbot

    a lot more women were down for NSA sex 

    Those being the NSA women

  • Passer_By

    As others have pointed out, the reddit users might not be representative.

    Nonetheless, it’s not that surprising that men find true casual sex (as opposed to FWB or some regular thing) very unsatisfying.  For most of us, the male enjoyment and satisfaction from sex is directly proportional to the level of enthusiasm, submission and enjoyment received from the woman.   The feeling that she has completely submitted and given herself over, both physically and emotionally.   It must be some primal thing that assures the guy that he’s her alpha.   But, by and large, you just can’t get that from genuinely casual sex.  It’s usually something awkward where she is reserved, mechanical and so forth.  And then there is the whole condom thing which only exacerbates the problem.

    There was a prior thread here where some woman was wondering why a guy who didn’t want to get serious and exclusive still acted in ways that seemed to elicit those kinds of emotions from her.  This is why.  The sex is 10 times better.  He still wants that – just with multiple girls.

     

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Passer By

      There was a prior thread here where some woman was wondering why a guy who didn’t want to get serious and exclusive still acted in ways that seemed to elicit those kinds of emotions from her. This is why. The sex is 10 times better. He still wants that – just with multiple girls.

      So are you saying that the male preference for relationship sex is unrelated to emotional intimacy, or at least his degree of emotional involvement? That one man could be very happy having sex with numerous women as long as they were all really into him? IOW, a harem.

  • PBateman

    @Heidi

    “I’m in an open relationship.”

    How does this truly work? I don’t see anything like this working. The last girl that told me this her boyfriend had a mental breakdown after what we did together. Everyone has a limit I guess.

  • PBateman

    @ Turning to the Dark side

    Don’t go all the way dude. If you turn into one of those guys who is focused on being a jerk, you will get consumed by this “game” mentality and it will ruin you. Stay focused within yourself and maintain a balanced lifestyle. Too much of one thing is never good. That includes too much pretending to be somebody you aren’t.

  • Will

    @ Susan

    “In that case, would you go for a ONS or might you consider something more with that person?”

    Every LTR I have had grew out of a hook up. For me hooking up has been something of date one in the past. But yes if all of the above was true and the woman didn’t want to hook up, but instead meet up for a date then I would probably go for that. But in the situations were an LTR isn’t feasible (think vacations) you can have great hook ups with the right person that you like.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Will

      Every LTR I have had grew out of a hook up. For me hooking up has been something of date one in the past.

      Interesting. I assume, then, that you’re not too worried about a woman’s “number.” Will this be true if and when you feel ready to marry?

  • Ramble

    If a woman has no inclination to behave like a porn star, will men consider that suboptimal sex?

    For Me?

    • Enthusiasm
    • Lust
    • Feminine Carnal Pleasure (that look on her face is where it’s at)

    However, I am guessing that some guys need to get with a Power Bottom.

  • Ted D

    @ Heidi – I would like to know how that works as well.  I realize that my “wiring” pretty much kills any chance of me having an open relationship ever, I’m very curious how it works for those that do it successfully.

    Is jealousy ever an issue?  Do you ever wonder if you man liked having sex with the random hottie last night better than with you?  Has your man ever indicated that he has similar concerns?

    Good grief, I can think of a ton more questions, but I don’t want you to think I’m on the attack, and don’t want to completely derail yet another HUS thread.  I’ve never known anyone that managed an open relationship long term.

  • http://aplace-formythoughts.blogspot.com/ Renee

    I have to say that it’s refreshing to see men have some sense of standards that don’t only apply when looking for a wife.  PBateman hits the nail on the head:

    Sounds like people are lowering their standards out there just to get some. Why not raise your standards and focus on that?

    For me, casual sex really is not really that much more than a release for a guy. What else could it be? Sometimes it’s utterly painful….those times where you and the girl are playing tug of war until the bar closes…then you’re drunk…by the time you get to sleep it’s 5am…you wake up the next day hungover and feeling like utter poo. That was my last one night stand and I’m not sure I really care enough to bother with that. If it really is just some kind of urge or ego boosting I need, why bother?  There are more productive uses of my time.

  • Blues

    If a woman has no inclination to behave like a porn star, will men consider that suboptimal sex?

    The way i see it and seems i’m not alone from other comments good sex =  she lusts for me I.E. makes me feel desired whatever that means, sure once in a while i’d welcome variation/experimentation but that’s more of an extra than the core thing.

    P.S. Blowjobs are considered obligatory at some point, facials, swallowing, etc. are optional though.

  • Jesus Mahoney

    I was never into expecting a woman to do the pornstar things like anal, threesomes, rimjobs, cumshots

    Rimjobs? A woman who’s given rimjobs, whether in casual or committed relationships, is definitely not a woman I would be in a relationship with. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t ever be able to kiss a woman after she told me she’s done that.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Rimjobs? A woman who’s given rimjobs, whether in casual or committed relationships, is definitely not a woman I would be in a relationship with. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t ever be able to kiss a woman after she told me she’s done that.

      Athlone McGinnis told that story a while back, having heard it in the locker room. The player said he’d been unable to get it up, so the girl had asked what she could do to help, and said she was willing to do anything. Rimjob is what he said, and she happily complied. I gag just thinking about it. Anyway, he told the story to the entire football team, and identified the girl. Athlone also said that the girl was beautiful. She had been recruited for track, and the minute she got to campus started acting like a porn star. No one could figure it out. Talk about damaged goods.

  • Ted D

    I went on a bit of a rant before on exactly this topic.  I think it was somewhere else, sorry Susan…

    I wondered why feminism had to force women to sink to the lowest of low, the players and womanizers, to feel that they were equal.  Why couldn’t women as a group force men to step up to the plate and act LESS like animals and MORE like intelligent humans?  Why is it that for women to be “equal”, they have to have sex “like a man”, as if the small group of casual sex players represent all men.

    It seems like every organized movement always falls into this trap.  No one wants to better humanity, they just want to rut like the lowest forms of humanity guilt free.  Very sad when such an organized effort has the capacity to truly lift the human condition.

  • Heidi

    @PBateman & Ted D –

    I usually get lots of questions, so I don’t mind answering them.  Susan, I hope you don’t mind if we derail for a bit?

    Every relationship has its boundaries.  For some, a partner isn’t allowed to flirt with or look at another member of the opposite sex. I realized pretty early on that I’ve never been the jealous type, so my partners were always free to flirt and pick-up on women.  I kept pushing the boundaries… he was free to kiss and fool around with women, and STILL I felt no jealousy.  In fact, I found it hot… women tend to flock to him (he’s naturally charming and works in a unique position that puts him in front of 100s of people, including lots of women every week), and I love that other women think he’s as sexy as I do.

    As for jealousy, it’s never been an issue. We are so incredibly perfect for each other (a lot of the same interests), that even if a woman came along that was 100x better in bed than me, he’d still “come home” because we have such an amazing connection.  And I admit, some of those women are better in bed than me (though he’d NEVER admit it)… for example, I have orthodontia that makes giving head difficult. If he’s getting it elsewhere, that makes *me* happy.  I can’t be someone EVERYTHING, so I seek solace in being almost perfect.

    For him, it was a challenge.  He wanted a traditional relationship, so we had to ease into this slowly. I pushed boundaries, but never aggressively, and not before setting him up with some friends so he could *see* that I really WAS okay with him hooking up elsewhere.  So far, it’s boiled down to this… he’s perfect for me in, like, 7 out of 9 areas. I have other men that fill those areas that are of little interest to him.

    One is hunting and outdoorsmanship.  I’m both a tree- and gun-hugger.  I love being outside, camping, climbing, hunting, and hiking.  (Hunting is just hiking with guns, really.)  He has ZERO interest in any of that; he’s a city-boy at heart.  So he lets me indulge that side of my life with a guy whom I’ve been friends with for 10+ years.  My boyfriend helps me train, encourages me to learn and grow, and supports the challenges I set for myself, without actually partaking them with me.  I’m training to do an ultra marathon next summer, and he’s been INCREDIBLY supportive of my training but has exactly ZERO interest in running it with me.  So he supports my marathon-partner (whose girlfriend is equally uninterested in running it).

    Lastly, when he maintains his “game” and “swagger,” that comes back to our relationship in a positive way… there’s no complacency with us. He’s charming, smart, and well read, and stays that way to maintain his SMV (if I’m using that right?). In turn, I have to compete with women 10 years my junior with tight asses and gorgeous skin.  OF COURSE I’m going to be hitting the gym and making sure I keep up on current events that interest him.  If he’s choosing to spend time with me, I make it worth his while.  :)

    To some degree, this is a facade… for example, I just had surgery, and for the past week, he’s been at my house wiping blood and snot off my face, feeding me ice cream and soda — normally a no-no on my diet — because he truly does love me and values my role in his life.  In turn, I offer him the same respect and devotion.

    Overall, what we’ve really gotten out of this is that we have AMAZING open communication.  I can come to him when I want to spend time with someone else, and he’s not jealous or angry.  He can share his true feelings with me and I can respond accordingly.  We aren’t without our faults, but we definitely have amazing communication.

  • Passer_By

    The unibomber has apparently discovered the manosphere.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      I am sorry to report that RMax had to leave us suddenly. Unfortunately, he won’t be able to return. I believe he may be found at Dalrock’s, if any of you can’t wait to get more of that charm…

  • Will

    @ Rmax

    Wow! Bitter much? Look feminism is like every other social movement that has changed the world we live in, it has had some unexpected consequences, some of which aren’t good. But that rant at least to me is WAY out of line. You have no substance, no facts and basically just anger and maybe hate filled verbal spew. Even when you might have a valid point it is sandwiched with so much anger that you really can’t get past the emotion to get to any intellectual idea in there.

    For me I appreciate feminism, I would never disagree with someone who says that sometimes it goes to far, or that in someways it has made male/female interactions harder. But do you really want to live in the world we had before feminism? Personally I think that women getting the right to vote, control their bodies, control their money, work, get educations, and have reasonably equal status with men in society is good. I am perfectly happy to deal with an occasionally difficult moment with the women in my life so that the women in my life can be independent interesting people instead of servile domesticated creatures.

  • Heidi

    @jesus –

    I like to think I’m sexually adventurous… but even I draw the line at that sort of activity on ANYONE, lol.  I don’t judge those who want to partake in that activity — I’m sure it’s hot for someone, otherwise it wouldn’t exist — but it’s really just  not for me.  Or anyone I’m in bed with, for that matter.  :)

  • Ted D

    @ Heidi – Very interesting.  I completely understand that no one person can be everything to someone, but for me I NEED to be everything to them sexually.  I’m completely OK with my SO having interests outside of my realm and indulging in those with friends.  In fact, I would be very concerned if my GF/Wife had no life outside of our relationship.

    For me, jealousy is a HUGE issue.  I don’t know for sure why, but I’m sure it is a combination of upbringing and anxiety.  Just the thought of my SO being with another guy for casual sex gets me so tense I feel like I could pop.  Some of that is simply that I cannot relate to wanting sex for the sake of sex alone, so any “casual” encounter to me would be a direct threat to the emotional state of our relationship.  As in, I cannot internalize she would simply be in it for the sex, and would feel that the encounter was a direct threat to my security, which I would act on accordingly.  I tend to rely on my romantic relationship as the anchor of my life.  By that I mean I expect things at home to be predictable and comfortable.  I find that when my home life is such, I can face the daily chaos life creates with ease and ability.  However, when my home life is in chaos, my entire life is as well.

    Opening up my romantic relationship would cause chaos in me, and I know beyond all doubt that it would be the beginning of the end for the relationship.  As it is my divorce proved to me that nothing is guaranteed.  I can’t imagine adding any more doubt and unease to make things that much more unstable.

    So, for me one of the things my SO must rely on me and only me for is sexual intimacy.  I’ve honestly given the idea of an open relationship thought many times throughout my life.  But for all the reasons I stated above I have not and will not act on it.  Just one try would/could be enough to cause instability that would ultimately end the relationship, and frankly I’m happy with my sex life now and would not risk the relationship for something I can obviously do without.

  • Will

    @Heidi

    I find that all pretty inspirational. I have pretty much zero jealousy myself and would love to be in a relationship like the one you describe, but I have never found a woman who could match me on the no jealousy thing. I would also have to say the you quite lucidly described allot of benifits I wouldn’t have thought of, like needing to work harder on yourself. Allot of what you say about the benefits you get from how he feels match the conclusions from Sex At Dawn, I wonder if we were in a different culture how many people could end up feeling that way? Allot of the women who I have tried to have open relationship talks with it seems to me that what their concerns boil down to is being afraid of social judgment, that their friends and family will think poorly of them.

    Best of luck with your relationship!

  • Passer_By

    “Theres a difference Hooking Up Smart ISNT part of the manosphere … as pointed out by plenty of MRAs”

    Some consider HUS part of the manosphere, some don’t.  I personally don’t (more like “manosphere adjacent”).  But to write that comment, you had to first spend a lot of time (for good or ill) in the real manosphere.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Some consider HUS part of the manosphere, some don’t. I personally don’t (more like “manosphere adjacent”).

      This is my own view.

  • Jesus Mahoney

    Heidi,

    Fer sure. Rimjob history is a definite deal breaker.

  • Ted D

    I get the idea that knowing your SO is having sex elsewhere keeps you working on yourself, but I can’t imagine working under that kind of pressure.  I mean, everyone should take care of themselves, but feeling like you HAVE to do it just to keep your mate?!  That is exactly the kind of stress I DO NOT need at home.  I have work for all the competitive stress I need.

    Now that I think on it, I really don’t like competition at all.  I wonder if that is a common trait among men that are turned off by women with lots of sexual experience.  I honestly think this is a major reason why an open relationship wouldn’t work for me.  I would totally resent having to “compete” with my SO’s other playmates.  Yeah, I know, it wouldn’t be a competition because she loves me and comes home.  But frankly, I don’t see it that way. I mean, the fact that she does love me and does come home means that I’m special to her.  But honestly if she feels the need to have sex outside of our relationship, then I’m not special enough in my opinion.

  • Passer_By

    @Ted

    “For me, jealousy is a HUGE issue.  I don’t know for sure why, but I’m sure it is a combination of upbringing and anxiety.  Just the thought of my SO being with another guy for casual sex gets me so tense I feel like I could pop.  Some of that is simply that I cannot relate to wanting sex for the sake of sex alone, so any “casual” encounter to me would be a direct threat to the emotional state of our relationship. ”

    I think you’re overthinking this with too much psychobabble.  Men are simply not wired to be comfortable sharing their women.  There is a reason that male animals kill each other over this.  Women have one womb and limiting breeding opportunities.   Despite birth control, and even if you don’t plan to have children, you have deeply evolved emotions about this that are hard to control.  Any male in the distant past that was comfortable with his woman being with other guys would have found himself raising the spawn of others to the exclusion of his own.  Not a good trait for survival of his genes.   I get that some guys do it, and Will seems intrigued, but something tells me it’s very rare and an inherently unstable situation.

    Women don’t like sharing either, by and large, but the underlying reasons for it would logically be more about their relationship (i.e., the male investment) being threatened rather than needing to monopolize him for mating purposes, so their feelings seem to be more maleable on it depending on context and societal expectations (and, of course, it creates a sort of preselection/social proof that can turn them on).

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Women don’t like sharing either, by and large, but the underlying reasons for it would logically be more about their relationship (i.e., the male investment) being threatened rather than needing to monopolize him for mating purposes, so their feelings seem to be more maleable on it depending on context and societal expectations (and, of course, it creates a sort of preselection/social proof that can turn them on).

      I am not the jealous type. I don’t think I’ve ever expressed jealousy to my husband, but then, he’s never given me reason to feel that way. The idea of him with another woman is intolerable – I am definitely not wired that way. If he ever cheated, our marriage would be over. Even if I wanted to stay, I couldn’t live with that.

      Perhaps the wiring on this lies on a spectrum, though I agree with Passer By that few can pull if off over the long-term.

  • Passer_By

    @susan

    “So are you saying that the male preference for relationship sex is unrelated to emotional intimacy, or at least his degree of emotional involvement? That one man could be very happy having sex with numerous women as long as they were all really into him? IOW, a harem.”

    “Unrelated” is an overstatment.  There is some additional benefit to emotional intimacy and long term familiarity.  But when these guys say they feel “bleh” after casual sex, I think it’s more what I described.  I think of often what guys call “emotional intimacy” is exactly the feeling I described and the urge to bond with/take care of a woman as a result of it.   So, yes, in a society that encouraged it, a guy could be very happy having sex with multiple women who were all emotionally invested in him.  VERY HAPPY. lol   Which is not to say that he wouldn’t care about each of them and develop strong feelings for each of them.   The hareming instinct in most men is strong (just ask Tiger Woods).The one thing that would lower the level of enjoyment is obviously guilt – but if you eliminate the notion that he is doing wrong (and guilt goes away), then all bets are off.

    But, for good reasons, our society frowns on that, and it certainly would make the whole raising a family thing really awkward.    And, at least for me, my children’s happiness trumps pretty much anything else, and I don’t see how kids in our society could be happy growing up in a polygynous household.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      I don’t see how kids in our society could be happy growing up in a polygynous household.

      In the accounts I’ve read of polyamory, even the ones intended to be positive, the children’s confusion and emotional upset was heartbreaking.

  • Will

    @Rmax

    “Erm women have always had those, women got the right to vote, exactly about 20 years after men had the right to vote … look it up educate yourself out of feminist eunuchism”

    ??? Maybe all of history is very wrong, but I think the 19th amendment was passed in 1920 while white land owning men have had the right to vote since the first continental congress. Minority men and non land owning men got the right to vote before women got it. If you want to talk about Rome guess what, in the Roman republic only male citizens could vote, going back to Athens, the first democracy, only men.

    “Women have always had control of their bodies, its called not sleeping around like a slut … & being responsible for who you sleep with …”

    Up until around 1800 in most of Western cultures it was completely acceptable for a father to marry his daughter off to whomever he felt like without her consent, once she was married it was fine for her husband to use her however he wanted, that doesn’t sound like control of her body. Still to this day in lots of middle eastern and Asian countries women still have no control over their bodies.

    “Women have always controlled household budgets & retail markets, in all civilisations, ie Rome, victorianism etc.”

    Individual women certainly have had that control, and it is certainly true that the model of the 40’s/50’s house wife who is only a home maker isn’t a good representation of women lives throughout history. It would be a little exhaustive to look at “all civilizations” (Taliban Afganistan, or Iranian Persian aren’t civilizations?) but for the Roman’s and Victorians what ever money a woman had when she was married became her husbands. Good husbands of course didn’t cut their wives out at that point, but their was no legal way for a woman to control any of her or her families money or property if her husband didn’t let her.

    For myself personally I seem to be getting way to much sex for the typical eunuch, and I pretty much get the sex I want. So at least for me feminism has never hurt me at any point, my career is doing well with many female collaborators and peers, and my sex life has been fun and plentiful. Once again if you have specific critiques of feminism (I certainly do) their is no problem with that. But your post is at the least very bitter and your personal insults to me back up my thought that you don’t really have any ideas on feminism you have feelings about feminism, and those feelings aren’t good.

  • Ted D

    @ Passer_by – LOL.  I’ve been told I over-analyze everything.  It is in my nature.  I know this and try my best not to allow it to become an issue, but frankly sometimes it is a constant struggle.  Add to that the fact that I’m recently introduced to the manosphere and the “red pill”, and you can probably imagine why my panties have been in such a bunch.

    I’ve barely scratched the surface in regards to the over analyzing I’ve been doing (and still am working through) since this journey began.  It is my tendency to analyze everything that really throws me off my game.  I’m very logical, but it is a trait I cultivated a long time ago to cover my overly active emotions.  I control my emotional tendencies through logic.  So, anytime I “feel” something, i have to analyze the hell out of it before I am comfortable allowing myself to feel it further.  In some situations, it can be entirely exhausting.  But, the alternative is to just go with my emotions, and I learned early on going this route is a recipe for disaster.

     

  • Will

    @ Susan, that is absolutely true. I am probably not the normal man, but a woman’s number doesn’t concern me (as long as she is honest). I would much rather be with a woman who has been with 10 guys than 1 (assuming that she has been with 10 guys because she likes it, not because she needs sex for validation). I don’t really worry much about measuring up to other men, I will or I won’t and if I don’t my ego isn’t bruised by it. And I am not worried about a woman being a slut and cheating on me (maybe because it hasn’t happened to me that I am aware of).

  • Passer_By

    @Will

    “but for the Roman’s and Victorians what ever money a woman had when she was married became her husbands. Good husbands of course didn’t cut their wives out at that point, but their was no legal way for a woman to control any of her or her families money or property if her husband didn’t let her.”

    Kind of like it is today, only with the genders reversed. :)

  • Anonymous_Male

    I DON’T LIKE CASUAL SEX.  Believe me, I’ve had my opportunities but it just does very LITTLE for me.  I need the woman to be IN TO ME as a person for it to work.

  • http://www.huoltamo.com/blogit/kaikki/henry-laasanen/ Henry

    If you are asking about sexual preferences, you should lay down the available options.

    1. Why I prefer relationship to casual sex? Well, my SMV is so low, that getting casual sex would require too much work and the quality of partners would be very low.

    2. Situation changes dramatically, if I have lots of beautiful and willing women to have sex with me. Then I would prefer casual sex.

    3. Women have the option to unlimited casual sex with partners of desent quality. So the choise is simpler for women.

    4. And, if a man would somehow become celebrity overnight and get the attention of lots of women, his prefence for relationships would propably change.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Henry
      I agree that men with lots of options for casual sex are bound to have more of it, and probably to like it more, IDK. The specific descriptions make me wonder, though. Even the men having it seem to complain about how badly they feel afterwards, and several said they actually prefer masturbation.

  • Heidi

    Ted D –

    I appreciate your honesty and your own reflection about non-monogamy.  It says a lot that you’ve even considered it.  Considering it, and considering that it may work for others, tells me you’re open minded.  And you don’t have to be non-monogamous to be open-minded.  :)

    Most of my close friends are monogamous.  I’m one of only a handful of non-monogamous people in my circle of friends and acquaintances, but all my friends are supportive and open-minded about it. They may judge me for it, but they never make me FEEL judged. (Huge difference between the two.)  Instead, I feel supported and encouraged.

    It’s absolutely a-ok to consider non-monogamy and arrive the rock solid conclusion that you’re monogamous through and through.  So don’t beat yourself up over it thinking less of yourself for not being into open relationships.  (It doesn’t sound like you are, but I just want to throw that out there.)

    It’s important to be honest with yourself about what you want from a relationship. Honesty with yourself makes honesty with your partners so much easier.  By acknowledging your life at home (your relationship) needs to be rock solid to serve as your anchor, you’re able to share that with your partner who can act accordingly.

    So kudos to you for being open-minded and honest with yourself and your partners!  :)

    Also, about the external forces keeping me in check… my partner won’t breakup with me because I gain 20#.  I like the “competition”… although, it’s mostly in my head.  I’m naturally a very competitive indiviudual.  My partner is not at all.

    It’s very common to feel that associate sex as something special that shouldn’t be shared. Feeling that way doesn’t make you any less or more of a person or relationship material… it just means you need a partner who views sex the same way. :)

  • Heidi

    Will –
    Thanks for finding it inspirational.  That sorta made me blush.  :)  I do admit, it can be hard to find a woman who matches your beliefs about open relationships.  For me, the problem was reverse… I couldn’t find guys into it!  My most recent partner has been the best.  He’s never been in an open relationship, AND his past girlfriend cheated on him.  So I had a HUGE hill to climb.  First and foremost, I had to restore his confidence.  He’s handsome, charming, and sweet… but he doubted himself because of the cheating incident.  Then I had to gain his ABSOLUTE trust.  This means I share EVERYTHING with him, including a promise I will never lie.  Often when I tell him something, I have to ask, “Am I oversharing?” because I’d much prefer *HE* ask me to scale back than forgetting to say something that he might find important.

    Essentially, for both of us, the biggest fear is being made to look a fool.  I don’t care if he hooks up with women, but I MUST hear it from him.  So if it’s a quick text message, that’s fine. I just don’t want him waiting until the next day and someone telling me before that.

    Same with him… he never EVER wants to be humiliated or embarrassed, and it’s my responsibility and his trust in me that dictates I NEVER put him in that position.  That means I never fuck his friends (fool around with is okay, not fuck), or hook up with someone out of anger or resentment towards him.

    It also means we had to delve into a conversation about sex and what it means… probably a whole ‘nother post, but the short story is that in the past, sex was a vengeful thing women used to lord over him, whereas for me, sex was a pleasurable extracurricular activity that could be free from emotions, but is best shared between two friends.

  • Will

    @ Susan

    For all of the porn like behavior stuff I think there are two issues at play. The first is that everyone likes to have sex that is a little bit kinkier every once in a wile, but kinkier is a relative term. If your default is missionary with the lights off every once in a wile I bet you get interested in lights on. If your default is what ever extreme contortion position you can get to probably sometimes you want anal or similar. But I doubt many men want it all the time. Personally what I have always said to my GF is that I don’t want her to be a porn star, but just every once in a while I would lover for her to be my porn star. If a woman was unwilling to ever do kinkier stuff (agreed on no rim jobs) I would be disappointed but could get past it. But since I work very hard to do all the things that she loves for sex most of the time I don’t think it is unreasonable for her to once in a wile do something for me.

    The other big thing I think is how much porn do you watch. It has been shown that porn reshapes neural circuits kind of similarly to how drugs do, men who get really into porn tend to start out fairly soft core, but find there preference sliding to more and more extreme, kind like how people start out with a little bit of heroin, “but then the little doesn’t do it so the little gets more and more”. I deffinetly know that at an earlier stage in my life were I watched to much porn my tastes slid in that direction and I was much more into kinky sex, when I decided to break the habit I got back to normal.

  • Will

    @Passer_By

    “Kind of like it is today, only with the genders reversed. :)”

    Yep, divorce and how it is handled is definitely one of the problems I have with feminism. I hope it gets sorted out before I get married.

  • Passer_By

    @Susan

    “The idea of him with another woman is intolerable – I am definitely not wired that way. If he ever cheated, our marriage would be over. Even if I wanted to stay, I couldn’t live with that. ”

    I believe you, but it just seems that the underlying reason is different (i.e., you don’t really need to monopolize his sperm the way a male needs to monopolize his mate’s womb).  There is also the issue of betrayal and trust and so forth, and you can’t really be sure about the degree to which your feelings are shaped by societal expectations.

    And nowhere here am I trying to be like that Doug guy and claim that everybody should be doing this and be cool with it.  Nor am I claiming that it gives men license to cheat on their spouses.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Passer By
      Agreed, the underlying reasons are different. Women do not fear cuckoldry. And I’ve undoubtedly been shaped by my environment.

  • Heidi

    Passer_By:

    I actually think you’re mistaken in your assessment that men are ingrained to compete.  Will references “Sex at Dawn” in another comment. This is a very insightful book that suggests that, actually, in ancient times, women had multiple partners, and all the men had a vested interest in helping her because it meant the off-spring (which might potentially be theirs) survived and thrived.

    I’m not a scientist or historian, but I do think there is some relevency to these studies.  I think we have a vested interest as a community to see that our youngest be subjected to many different parental figures.

    Anyway, I’m sure there are multiple interpretations of the data… I’m not sure either monogamy or non-monogamy is the absolute answers.  It seems a balance of both might need to exist to have a balanced society, similarly how most societies have (throughout time) have had a segment of non-reproducing women (for whatever reasons… choice, infidelity, lack of partner) that have contributed to the growth of that society.  (Generally called the auntie brigade.)

  • Will

    @Heidi

    You are completely correct. Almost anytime you have evolution at work you want a balance of different solutions to a problem (Ie some people want monogomy some don’t) a species will bias towards one solution because it worked well in the recent past, but in order to have selection of traits you need to have diversity. This is why even with horrible disease like ebola when there is an outbreak you never here of more than a 90% fatality rate. The high diversity in the immune system is there so that some people survive any given threat. Diversity in pair bonding will work similarly, there are benefits and draw backs to both solutions so you don’t want to get to biased in any given direction.

  • GudEnuf

    Poll for women, which would make you more upset:

    Scenario 1: Your man meets a woman at a party and has a deep and intimate conversation with her. At the end of the night, he feels they really connected on an emotional level. They don’t make physical contact, and he leaves without getting her contact.

    Scenario 2: You man meets a woman at a party and fucks her. Although they enjoy each other physically, there have no emotional intimacy. He leaves without getting her contact info.

    Which would make you more upset?

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @GudEnuf
      Shitty choice. #2 is intolerable. #1 puts us into counseling. I’ll take Door #1.

  • Heidi

    @Susan –

    I agree… if my partner ever cheated, he’d be gone.  He knows this. I do not tolerate lying and losing that trust would be the demise of our relationship. And, yes, people in open relationship can cheat and lie.

    I agree with you and passer_by… few can pull off non-monogamy long term.  It’s not for everyone, and that’s okay. I don’t think there is one relationship type that works for EVERYONE.

    Re: polyamory and raising children.  I agree, some situations are not ideal for children.  But I’ve also seen heartbreak and confusion come from monogamous relationships, especially divorce and/or a cheating partner.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      But I’ve also seen heartbreak and confusion come from monogamous relationships, especially divorce and/or a cheating partner.

      Yes, of course, that is far too common.

  • Passer_By

    “Will references “Sex at Dawn” in another comment. This is a very insightful book that suggests that, actually, in ancient times, women had multiple partners, and all the men had a vested interest in helping her because it meant the off-spring (which might potentially be theirs) survived and thrived.”

    They can suggest it all they want, but I’m skeptical.  And, if it’s true, I guarantee you the feelings were very mixed.  But, even in that case, it suggests that all of the potential fathers were expected to contribute, in which case it comes down to a sperm war as to who is the father.  But at least everybody has a shot and everybody is responsible.  And the arousal generated by the sperm war issue is real.   But that’s a lot different than just giving other guys freebies with the woman to whom you are committed.

    Even in your case, you say it’s ok to fool around with his friends but not have intercourse.  Why is it ok with strangers but not his friends? It must be a sort of competition thing.  It’s easier for him to ignore it and pretend it doesn’t exist if he doesn’t know the guy.   Do you have the same rule about him with  your friends?  Or is it a moot point because he couldn’t get with them anyway? (which is another objection to these “open relationships” – women can get outside sex on demand but for guys it takes a lot of work and approaching).

  • Ramble

    But I’ve also seen heartbreak and confusion come from monogamous relationships, especially divorce and/or a cheating partner.

    Really? I can’t believe it.

  • Heidi

    @GudEnuf –

    I know I’m not the norm, but from what I understand, most women feel more betrayed by an emotional affair rather than a physical one.

    For me, if my partner meets someone with whom he connects, who am I to restrain that?  Love and humanity is a beautiful thing that we need more, not less of, in the world.  Personally, I like when my partner has a connection with someone and is in that happy/excited stage we’ve all been in. It gives me satisfaction to see him happy and excited.  :)

  • Will

    “But, even in that case, it suggests that all of the potential fathers were expected to contribute, in which case it comes down to a sperm war as to who is the father”

    The key thing about this is that you have to drop our current way of thinking about economics. In very small (less then 100) migratory communities food is shared 100%, so if you are a man you are responsible for providing meat for every member of your tribe weather or not they are related to you (altruism is not an uncommon evolutionary trait amongst closely related heards/pacs). So this removes the economic concern that seems to dominate the evopsyc perspective that you will end up wasting your resources on another mans child. In this community if you get to have sex with every woman and they get to have sex with every man you are being evolutionarily helped as your sperm is most likely to impregnate a woman with a compatible immune system making a healthier baby, instead of taking 10,000 shots at an incompatible woman and finally knocking her up with a weak baby.

  • Passer_By

    @Will

    “In this community if you get to have sex with every woman and they get to have sex with every man you are being evolutionarily helped ”

    Ah, there’s the rub.  I’m quite confident that some men were getting much more than others.

    And it’s not just about wasting your resources, it’s about the need to monopolize the mating opportunity.

  • Heidi

    Passer_by –

    I feel like maybe your judgmental attitude is making it a little difficult to determine if you’re genuinely interested in my responses or if you’re just looking for a way to tell me I’m wrong, regardless of what I say.

    Look, this relationship style ISN’T for everyone.  I know, in particular, I couldn’t enter into it with just anyone… especially someone judgmental and closed-minded. If it’s not for you, THAT’S OKAY.  But it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist. Just as I believe monogamy isn’t for me, I *DO* believe it has a place as a solid relationship style in society.

    “They can suggest it all they want, but I’m skeptical.  And, if it’s true, I guarantee you the feelings were very mixed.”

    How about you open up to the possibility by reading?  I don’t care if you’re skeptical… the science suggests that this is the way it was.  Do I agree with it 100%?  No.  I’m not a scientist, and data interpretation can always have some sort of personal slant.  But I can’t disregard the science completely.

    “But that’s a lot different than just giving other guys freebies with the woman to whom you are committed.”

    I’m a little confused by this… are you suggesting my boyfriend gives freebies to other men?  Because my boyfriend is 100% hetro.  Are you suggesting he “let’s” me give “freebies”? First, my decisions are mine. I own my actions 100%.  Out of courtesy, I ask my boyfriend before I go out with someone, but it’s ultimately *MY* decision.  Secondly, I fool around with my friends… in exchange, I get my own sexual gratification, companionship, and partners who share my interests.  I’m not sure why you think it’s “free”?

    “Even in your case, you say it’s ok to fool around with his friends but not have intercourse.  Why is it ok with strangers but not his friends? It must be a sort of competition thing.  It’s easier for him to ignore it and pretend it doesn’t exist if he doesn’t know the guy.   Do you have the same rule about him with  your friends?  Or is it a moot point because he couldn’t get with them anyway? (which is another objection to these “open relationships” – women can get outside sex on demand but for guys it takes a lot of work and approaching).”

    First, he’s never asked me not to fuck his friends.  It’s just that none of his friends are on my list, and because it might be awkward because MOST guys can’t compartmentalize.  He’s probably be okay with me fucking one of his friends… I’ve just never asked because, based on our relationship, it’s just not something I want to get into.

    Secondly, did you miss the part where I said I set him up with one of my girl friends?  She’s an attractive woman with her Masters in Biology.  She’s successful, confident, and funny.  A total catch that is currently single.  He’s allowed to fuck my friends, so long as they’re into it.

    Third, I recognize that it’s more difficult for men to get action than women.  We’ve talked about that in the past.  Despite that, because of his job, schedule, and available free time, he gets WAY more tail than I do.  I rarely take advantage of the open relationship thing… maybe 4-6 times in the past year?  I just crave my independence and like knowing that he has companionship when I can’t be there.

  • Heidi

    Passer_by:

    “Ah, there’s the rub.  I’m quite confident that some men were getting much more than others.”

    Why is it about quantity and not quality?  I’d much rather spend 3/4 of a year masturbating in anticipation of the good fucking I do the other 1/4th of a year than spend 3/4 of the year fucking everything in sight which may or may not be better than masturbating.

  • Will

    @Passer_By

    “And it’s not just about wasting your resources, it’s about the need to monopolize the mating opportunity.”

    But my point is that monopolizing a single woman isn’t a good evolutionary strategy since you tend to get a less healthy child then you do from trying a few times with many women. I am sure you are correct that a few men are getting less in this system but anthropologists working with these types of cultures usually find that everybody is having allot of sex.

    Just for the record I am not endorsing this kind of system for us, we don’t live in that type of society. I am just saying that allot of evopsych is based on economic assumptions extrapolated from our society which are likely incorrect for pre agriculture humans (most of human history).

  • Passer_By

    @Heidi

    Honestly, I’m not judging anything.  And, if I were single, I might invite you over to discuss it. :)

    “Despite that, because of his job, schedule, and available free time, he gets WAY more tail than I do.  I rarely take advantage of the open relationship thing… maybe 4-6 times in the past year? ”

    To me, that explains a lot.  You might trying taking advantage of it as much as (or more than) he does and see if he remains comfortable.

    “Secondly, did you miss the part where I said I set him up with one of my girl friends? ”

    Yes, I did miss that – sorry.  But it sort of supports my point. I bet he would find that much harder to do.

  • Passer_By

    @Will

    “But my point is that monopolizing a single woman isn’t a good evolutionary strategy since you tend to get a less healthy child then you do from trying a few times with many women.”

    Fair enough – but better still to monopolize the many women. :)

  • Will

    Passer_By

    True enough :) I have to admit I have had one or two dreams were me and my 10 Victoria secret model wives are very happy.

  • Skyeater

    I’d be more convinced by this evidence if it wasn’t coming from Reddit, of all places. Granted, with how popular and well-known Reddit has become, you’ll have a fair number of “normal” men and women who are in their prime dating years and have the experience to back up their anecdotes. I believe they even have a small seduction sub-section for dating advice and the like.  But the vast majority of people on Reddit are going to be beta males, with no game, for whom ANY kind of female attention would be welcome and girls who probably didn’t get enough attention growing up, so now they post pictures of themselves nude and make AMA about being polyamorous or whatever.

  • Ceer

    For the sake of argument, let’s assume that a majority of both men and women prefer relationship sex to casual hookup sex.  I’ll start off by asking some basic questions.

    Large scale:
    Why then is casual sex the standard?
    How can relationship culture be promoted effectively?
    Small scale:
    How as a woman can you identify pro-relationship men in your personal interactions?
    How can you foster relationships with these men?
    How do you persuade other women to help you or adopt your techniques to help their own strategy?
    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Ceer
      Excellent questions, I wish I had the answers. Maybe readers will offer some.

  • GudEnuf

    @ Heidi: Thanks for answering. Evo-psych suggests most women would prefer their man have a one-night-stand, but I think in reality most women would prefer an emotional affair.

    Women and men aren’t so different in that regard.

  • PBateman

    @ Susan

    I have a lot of options. This means most meetings with women nowadays lead to casual sex. Chalk me down for one of those who can do without it. The amount of time and effort for something so short and meaningless? Not all it’s chalked up to me. Reminds me of surfing (if you are new to it). A lot of work for a few seconds of a thrill. The difference is you can eventually get the most out of surfing as you get better, but with most women nowadays, it stays the same. Short, thrill ride.

    Don’t get me wrong. If I see a beautiful woman it’s hard not to want this, but my motivation for it dies a little bit with every short term encounter.

  • Lavazza

    I think there are many reasons why men have casual sex even if they find it lower quality than relation sex. Getting up the notch count is good for the self esteem (up to some individual limit whenreit leads to cynicism and difficulty to bond) . Having some good stories to tell your friends. To some extent it is good for a mans position in a relation that the woman knows that the man is not above slumming it, so that she does not feel to sure of her position and how strong the competiition is. Love of variety.

  • Heidi

    I just had a thought, too… what is casual sex?  If I have a guy I keep in my little black book and call when I need some action, is that casual?  Our relationship might be friendship, but it’s a relationship nonetheless.

    ONSs would obviously be casual, but I wonder how many ONSs people actually have?

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Heidi
      I would define casual sex as any sex where it’s understood that commitment is off the table, now or in the future. Just my .02. I’m more used to defining hookup sex, in which it’s understood that there may be no further contact.

  • Abbot

    a woman’s number doesn’t concern me (as long as she is honest)

    and therein lies the problem – women need to be honest and let men decide for themselves their level of comfort

  • Ceer

    @ Will

    Human society is not just about genes.  It’s about culture and technology too.  If you judge by the correlation between marriage and aboriginal plow usage, you’ll find that many of the same cultures that developed monogamy also developed technologically at a much faster rate.

    Did it ever occur to you that your experience under feminism may not be universal?  I personally feel I have done terribly.  It’s a common catch phrase that people get whatever relationships they want now… all I hear is more along the lines of:  “more sex for me, none for you, har har har!”  Your “freedom” includes the freedom for me to be involuntarily celebate.  No thanks.  I don’t by that load of bull.  I don’t play by those rules.

  • Passer_By

    @Heidi

    My prior response got lost in moderation – not sure what tripped it.

    Anyway, I am not being judgmental in the least.  If I were I single, I might invite you over to discuss these important issues in more detail. :)

    Having said that, I think a lot of times people in alternative arrangements throw out the “judgmental or close minded” card anytime somebody questions the underlying facts.  Being skeptical of your factual account or your understanding of the male mindset is not “judging” you. It’s simply having a different opinion.

    “Secondly, did you miss the part where I said I set him up with one of my girl friends?  ”

    Yes, I did miss that.  Sorry.  But it sort of supports some of the points I have made. Do you think he would be as comfortable setting you up with his friends?

    “Despite that, because of his job, schedule, and available free time, he gets WAY more tail than I do.  I rarely take advantage of the open relationship thing… maybe 4-6 times in the past year?”

    To me, this explains a lot.  You might try taking advantage of it as often as, or more of than, he does, and see if he remains comfortable with it.

  • Will

    @ Ceer

    On your first point I completely agree with you, that is my main theme here, evolution and genes explains very little of human behavior. Culture, society, environment and personal experience have much more impact on how an individual will behave.

    For the second I am sorry to here that you don’t feel the same and sorry to here that you are being forced into involuntary celibacy. Since Susan removed Rmax’s posts the context is lost. I agree that there are problems from feminism, large swaths of men not getting sex who deserve to be is definitely one of them. What my point was that I felt that his blanket condemnation of feminism in such an angry way was uncalled for. I will agree that modern feminism is mostly angry, reactionary and harmful. But my point was that I think feminism 1900-1970 or so did really good things that I am grateful for. If the results have been bad enough for you personally that you don’t agree I can understand that, big props for writing about it in a polite, personal and non personally offensive way (I am not a fan of being called a eunuch) in contrast to Rmax.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Will, you haven’t known me very long, but readers here can assure you that I delete commentary very, very infrequently. RMax was out of line on so many fronts I just couldn’t let it stand. Mostly, he was hurling insults without any real desire to engage or have a dialogue, which makes him a troll, and a profane one at that.

  • Anonymous

    I had a one night stand earlier this month.  I was kind of bleh about it too.  I’m not exactly looking for a relationship, or to be tied down, because that would mean that I would have to stop seeing other women.  I’d rather be in an open relationship, an experimental phase.  I’m 24, I’m not looking to get married soon, or looking forward to breaking up with anything.

  • anonymous

    @ Turning to the Dark Side

    “Bad news: I have started treating women badly, and I am amazed at how well it works. It even works on my wife. Had more and better sex with her in the last 6 months of my being an asshole and openly flirting with other women, than all of the previous 10 years of flowers and dinners and foot massages put together. So my turn to the dark side is only accelerating. This is bringing my marriage to an end, which is fine with me.”

    I would really be cautious about thinking that because in the short-term, it appears that things are getting better that THIS is a good long-term strategy for your marriage. Your wife may believe that you’re about to bail and hence -more sex. Most women don’t just bail out (esp w/ kids unless she’s a basket case or an addict) without carefully planning the exit so the change in behavior may be in order to bide her time.

    Men often think that when his nagging wife stops nagging (example I’m using because it’s so common or withholding sex is another) it means that things are going well- it absolutely doesn’t. She nags when she doesn’t know how to ask you for what she wants or is unaware about what’s bothering her.  When she stops nagging, she’s often planning her exit because she’s given up. This is really common so watch out for this pitfall.

    I suggest that you try to find a way to communicate your needs to her and have her do the same. Perhaps visit the marriagebuilders site and print out some of the articles. Try to dig deeper on what’s really going wrong.

    Best of luck.

  • Tasmin

    I think most men and women prefer sex within relationships, so most of the time casual sex is really just a proxy for something more. The preference seems to be relationship-oriented sex but casual sex is one fleeting way to achieve a part of what is really desired or a hopeful gateway to something more.  While casual sex works for short-term satisfaction, intimacy – of which sex is a large, but not singular component, is something that is needed for long-term satisfaction. People can find satisfaction for a moment, or sting the moments together to try and sustain it, but it is always fleeting and will continue to require more of the participants in order to deliver the same positive response. There are diminishing returns and I would bet the curve looks similar to those of food and/or drug addictions. The dissatisfaction comes sooner, is more profound and lasts longer after each encounter, month, year, of the no-strings sex.  The enjoyment is then replaced by the need to fill that growing void and when it becomes a need, the value of the actual act is changed, it is pushed further from true intimacy; it becomes a physical response loaded with all kinds of other emotional needs (unmet) and the participants begin to wonder why they are increasingly dissatisfied even though they may be getting sex fairly regularly.

    I think casual sex is approaching the norm because the idea that one can have happiness and satisfaction without sustained investment, without risk, work, compromise, or sacrifice has been pounded into us.  That sex – and not intimacy or commitment or relationships, is really the endgame. The complete bifurcation of sex and intimacy requires a lot of self-discipline and sacrifice and introspection in order to stitch back together. I think most people are too ingrained in the pattern or are in the ‘just get mine’ or are stuck in the instant gratification to contemplate their real needs and how to achieve them.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      I think casual sex is approaching the norm because the idea that one can have happiness and satisfaction without sustained investment, without risk, work, compromise, or sacrifice has been pounded into us. That sex – and not intimacy or commitment or relationships, is really the endgame.

      Yes, it’s like we’re all trying to get that free lunch.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Susan, I think you are reading too much into my wanting “the good kind of sex” with my wife. Whatever we were doing before we got married qualifies. I’m sure the vast majority of sex-starved husbands would agree.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Dark Side
      If the sex has dramatically improved, why hasn’t that good for the relationship? Sorry I misinterpreted your comment about party girls.

  • Hope

    “#2 is intolerable. #1 puts us into counseling. I’ll take Door #1.”

    LOL Susan. I agree. Both choices suck. I’d take that option, but definitely would prefer option #3, no cheating at all!

  • Heidi

    Turning to the Dark Side –

    Have you tried talking with your wife?  I’m curious what sort of conversations the two of you have had?  Has she expressed dissatisfaction with her life? The life you share together?

    Romantic gestures are sweet and nice… I appreciate that you’ve been “the nice guy,” but have you considered making your romantic gestures more personal? Flowers and dinner and back rubs are nice, but gestures that are more personal are infinitely more romantic.  Things like getting up on a cold and early morning that she has to be up, but you get to sleep in, to scrape her car and warm it up for her.  It’s cheaper than a dinner.  Or instead of bringing her flowers, bring her a favorite herb (added bonus, hopefully she’ll cook you dinner!).  Or instead of an expensive dinner out, turn off the TV and have a picnic for her on the family room floor.  I did this for my boyfriend and hand made lots of little treats, including chocolate dipped chile peppers (now his favorite!).  He loved it so much, I made it a monthly date night occurrence.  Way cheaper than dinner out.  :)  For me, he knows how much I love “My Big Fat Greek Wedding,” so he had a greek night where he made me falafal, gyros, and we watched MBFGW.  :)

    Those gestures often make me want to be a better partner and “incentivize” me to try and “out-do” my partner’s awesomeness.  In short, the better I treat him, the better he treats me.

    Anyway, it takes two to make a relationship fail… I’m not placing the blame on you BY ANY MEANS.  I’m just suggesting that you should try talking to her.  Particularly about the sex.  I had a long term boyfriend who once was angry at me for a few weeks.  He FINALLY said, “I HATE that I’m the only one who initiates sex.”  I had no counter-argument… he was always the initiator, and that wasn’t fair.  From that point on, I made sure to initiate the sex even when I wasn’t “in the mood” because the health of my relationship depended on it. He could’ve saved those weeks of resentment by just saying something from the get-go.  Have you tried telling her how you feel?

  • SayWhaat

    GudEnuf,

    Both spell out the end of the relationship, but I’d have to pick #1, if only because it offers a very small chance at reconciliation.

  • Dave

    @ Heidi

    Chocolate dipped chili peppers. EPIC Thank You

    @ Dark Side

    I actually talked about this with my two roomates a few weeks ago, should note they are both women. Ones a carousel rider and the other is in a serious LTR.

    They summed it up like this, the girl sleeps with the asshole but she stays with the nice guy. (I’m gonna add on as long as the nice guy isn’t uber beta.)

    As for the loss of sex thing, the relationship girl did the same thing (their at like 5 years or something crazy), her boyfriend did what you did and it worked… for a few weeks. At which point they almost broke up, he toned it down and actually TALKED to her about it and as far as I know he doesn’t complain anymore. (That was last year sometime.)

    Ted said it best where you can try to find a good balance of ass-nice guy.

    Now

    @ Susan

    I am in agreement witht he men from reddit or whatever it is, casual sex is basically a lot of work for a mastrubatory aid and its better than nothing.

     

  • Sassy6519

    Scenario # 2 (physical cheating) would upset me the most. I wouldn’t be able to get over my visceral nauseous reactions to the thought of a man I was dating sleeping with another woman. Just ew.

    I’m definitely an avid supporter of “relationship sex” instead of casual sex, hence why I don’t engage in casual sex. I can on some level, however, understand why some people take the “casual sex is better than no sex” route. I’ve recently got out of a relationship and lost the great “relationship sex”, and I’m about to claw my own face off. I refuse to engage in casual sex, but the urge for sex is there regardless.

    I tell you what. When I do meet another great man and start a relationship with him, he is going to come into possession of a sex starved minx. All my pent up frustration is going to be released on him, and he probably won’t know what hit him. God bless his poor unsuspecting soul.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    My sex life has improved dramatically since I started being a jerk, but as Anonymous pointed out, being a jerk is not a good relationship long-term strategy. It isn’t good for her, and it isn’t good for me either. My wife is probably thinking about divorcing, and I think of it as inevitable.

    Maybe as Ted D and “Married Man’s Sex Life” points out, there is a middle ground where you can be good to a woman and still turn her on.

    Maybe I can stay married, but it just doesn’t feel right that I have to game my wife. If I have to use game, then what is the point of being married? It is like a series of one night stands, except I have to pay all of her bills and health insurance.

    Maybe I am just pissed about my love and marriage fantasy being ruined.

  • SayWhaat

    All my pent up frustration is going to be released on him, and he probably won’t know what hit him. God bless his poor unsuspecting soul.

    Same, sister. I’ve got a ton of things I want to try, and it’s all theory just begging for application. ;)

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    I guess what I am saying is that it doesn’t feel like my wife loves me if I have to game her to turn her on. But maybe that’s not true.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Turning

      I guess what I am saying is that it doesn’t feel like my wife loves me if I have to game her to turn her on. But maybe that’s not true.

      Whoa! I’m so glad you said this. You are pulling the plug waaayy to soon IMO. A woman can love a man very much and not feel turned on by him. She can love him so much that she desperately wishes he would turn her on, that she could figure it out and tell him, or that he would magically figure it out and change. You can do the latter. You don’t need to be a jerk and an asshole, a bit of dominance goes a long way. Sexy dominance is best – Athol’s got all kinds of sexy moves to suggest. Buy his book immediately, you can’t go wrong.

      You said you have kids, right? Then for their sakes, as well as your own, see this through with everything you’ve got. If it’s too far gone you’ll know you gave it everything, including changing the way you communicate with your wife to make her want you. For the record, she may want you sexually but have some anger, and it sure sounds like you are angry. MMSL isn’t going to take care of that – if it’s a real issue, talk to someone about it. Divorce should be a last resort if you have kids.

  • Passer_By

    @Turning

    “I guess what I am saying is that it doesn’t feel like my wife loves me if I have to game her to turn her on. But maybe that’s not true.”

    Well, there are those who would say that your statement is the male equivalent to “I don’t feel like my husband loves me if I have to keep my weight under 175 to turn him on.”  It’s probably an overstatement to a point, and you might point out that a personality change is more phony than maintaining healthy weight, etc.  But ask yourself if all those things obsequious things you were doing were REALLY you, or just you trying to figure out how to make her happy and want to have sex with you. If the latter, then you have your answer.  Just be a more confident and dominant (and less obsequious) version of you.  Reserve assaholic behavior for rare occasions.

    On the other hand, it sounds like you just don’t like her very much anymore because she was such a bitch for so long.  If so, and if you don’t have kids, eject.  But give her a few facials first and talk her into a 3 way first, billing it as a way to salvage your marriage. :)

     

  • Celeste

    I would absolutely be much more upset about an emotional affair.  I realize that eventually, both of our bodies will decay into age, but our emotional bond will last till death.  The emotional bond is more important to me.

  • deti

    @ Heidi:

    Maybe I’m just dense.  If a couple has an open relationship, how can one cheat on the other?  Doesn’t the fact that both can sleep with others negate cheating?  Isn’t it impossible to cheat if you have an open relationship?

  • Heidi

    Turning –

    “My wife is probably thinking about divorcing, and I think of it as inevitable.”

    Seriously, why are you guys not TALKING?!?!  Divorce shouldn’t be a blind-siding thing… if divorce is on the table, you should know about it LONG before the paperwork gets filed.

    “Maybe as Ted D and “Married Man’s Sex Life” points out, there is a middle ground where you can be good to a woman and still turn her on.”

    Uhm, THERE IS.  If your wife isn’t responding to it, she’s not respecting you for who you are, and you have more problems than just sexual compatibilty.

    What have YOU done to fix the sex in your relationship?  Have you talked about it or assumed it’ll get better because you brought her more flowers?  Have you given her ways she can fix the problem, or just assumed she’s a mind reader and then blamed her when it hasn’t gotten better?

    Stop being an “asshole” and start being a HUSBAND.  You know, a partner who communicates with his spouse?

    No wife can argue when a husband explains EXPLICITLY why they’re upset and what their wife can do to help fix the situation.  There’s no arguing with someone who says, “I’m hurt, this is why, and this is what you can do to fix it.”

  • Heidi

    @deti –

    Cheating isn’t just sex.  As we’ve seen, it can be physical and/or emotional.  The common denominator in cheating is deception.  I do not tolerate deception at all it.  If my partner lied to me about sex or broke any of our boundaries, that is cheating.  Why a guy who has free reign would lie is beyond me, but I’ve seen it happen.  My partner and I have certain boundaries, and I trust he doesn’t betray those.  To do so would be cheating.

  • deti

    @ Dark Side:

    Game.  It does a marriage good. 

    I’ve been married 15 years, red pill last six months.  Started gaming and showing more dominance.  The aboutface and her attraction to me happened literally overnight. 

    You don’t have to run hardcore asshole game to keep her interested.  You’re right that that will eventually piss her off.  I sucked up to my wife, put up with way too much of her emotional outbursts and disrespect, and did everything she wanted.

    Here’s what I did:

    1.     She told me she “sometimes” did n’t find me physically attractive.   So I responded by telling her in no uncertain terms that I wouldn’t tolerate disrespect or lack of appreciation. I also  responded with:  “I won’t stay in a marriage in which I’m not appreciated.  If you’re not happy with me, perhaps you’d be happier without me.”  That changed things up quite a bit.

    2.   I also hit the gym.  When you do this and it’s out of character for you, she wonders why you’re doing it.  

    3.   Make it clear that sometimes, you get what you want or you just get up and walk away.  You never, never beg her for anything sexual.   So one night I started kissing and moving to sex.  She said “uhhhh, I don’t know…..” So I stopped and just walked away.   I didn’t say anything, didn’t wheedle.  Just walked away.   She complained at me and said “what’s the problem?  You always go for sex now.  I was just not quite there yet.”  I said “OK, but I wanted it now, and I don’t really feel like pushing through your resistance right now.”  (But if she wants sex, you are duty bound to oblige.  And do her good.)

           a.    Don’t have slow and easy sex all the time.   Sometimes you need to get on top and jackhammer away.

           b.    And sometimes you need to make her orgasm three times before you put it in.

    4.   Learn how to tell her no.   My wife wanted me to put up this bed in my home office, which we also use as a guest room.  I put up a plain bed, not the nice one.  I want my office the way I want it.  She pestered me about it; I just keep saying no.  No explanation.  No justification.  Just “No.”   It’s my home office.  I don’t need to explain or justify it.

    5.     Don’t ask her for some things.   Tell her it will be done a certain way.  Not “Can I buy a couple of suits because I really need them for work”.   It’s “I’m going to buy a couple of suits because I need some new ones.”   

    Not “So what are we gonna do for dinner tomorrow night?”    It’s “tomorrow night we’re getting dinner at the new steak house.   Get a baby sitter and be ready to go at 6:30.   And wear that black dress I like.”   And sure enough, 6:30 comes around, I get home from work.  The sitter is there with the kids.  Wife is in the dress, the heels, the makeup and the hair done, and is waiting by the door with purse in hand and nether regions humming like a tuning fork.   We get home, she can’t pay and get rid of the sitter fast enough.  That dress looked even better sprawled across the bedroom floor that night. 

    6.     Don’t apologize for the shit you have to do.  If you have to work late one night, just do it and don’t apologize for it.

    7.     When you do need to say you’re sorry, you apologize once and only once, and that is the end of it.   Do not let her throw it back in your face — EVER.  If she does, you call her out on it and tell her you already said you were sorry and it’s over and done with.

    8.    Don’t put up with disrespect, in private or in public.  If she does in private, call her out on it immediately.   If she does it in public, even jokingly, when you get home you call her out on it, tell her exactly what she said or did, and tell her it’s not funny and you expect it not to happen again.  Don’t say your feelings were hurt.  Tell her she disrespected you.  Then, when it happens again, you do the same thing.   Lather, rinse, repeat.   Trust me, she will disrespect you again.  You just need to call it out every time.   

    9.    You. Are. In. Charge.    You are the captain.  She is the first officer.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Lucky Mrs. Deti. She has a new lover and she didn’t even have to cheat. I got all tingly just reading that.

  • Hope

    “I guess what I am saying is that it doesn’t feel like my wife loves me if I have to game her to turn her on. But maybe that’s not true.”

    Does a husband not love his wife if she has to stay in shape to turn him on?

    Love is separate from being turned on. The two can harmoniously coexist, and ideally in a marriage, do coexist. But no woman gets aroused by flowers and food from a man, just as no man gets aroused by massively obese fat rolls on a woman.

    Your idea of “romance” is giving gifts, and probably physical touch, but she might speak a different love language:

    http://marriage.about.com/cs/communicationkeys/a/lovelanguage.htm

    And as others have pointed out previously, even if she likes getting gifts, too much “beta” not enough “alpha” is not good. It’s about balance.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Thanks for all the advice you are probably all correct. Except maybe for Heidi.

    Yes, Heidi, I talked about it. Yes, I asked what I could do. Yes, I tried to figure out the special things that she enjoyed. Yes, we went to marriage counseling. Two different marriage counselors. Did all of this many many times for YEARS.

    She told me she needed MORE vacations, dinners, footrubs, backrubs. I needed to do MORE housework and do MORE of the childcare. She needed MORE money too, so I took a second job (was already making six figures). I tried all of this for a while, but that clearly didn’t work. Then she told me that this is just a natural part of marriage. That I should start watching more football instead of thinking about sex.

    All of this took about 10 years. Since I was following your advice, Heidi, and trying really really hard to be a better husband, can I blame you for 10 lonely miserable years of my life?

    Who would have guessed that chasing other women and telling her to go to hell would make her feel like having sex with me? Wish I would have known that 10 years ago.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Oh yeah, Hope, I read all about the 5 languages of love, men are from mars, light her fire, and a few other books too.

    Hope and Heidi don’t seem to get it. GIVING HER WHAT SHE WANTED DIDN’T WORK. IT NEVER WORKED EVEN A LITTLE BIT, NOT EVEN ONCE IN A WHILE.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Turning
      You are in the process of swallowing one huge red pill. I am sorry On behalf of my sex. Your wife sounds like she’s been an entitled bitch – no reason in the world you should have to take a second job when you were already providing handsomely for your family. I don’t know whether you still love her – but if you do, you can probably fix this, and in a way that feels good to you. You have found the right corner of the Internet, and there are many in these parts who will support you. Honestly, I’m with Deti – game is going to make you feel like you have regained control, and it is going to make your wife want to please you.

  • lovelost

    #27 Susan

    If a woman has no inclination to behave like a porn star, will men consider that suboptimal sex?

    Susan, also take this into consideration that porn has given both men and women ideas to experiment with sex, anal sex, threesomes, cum shot are all *gifts* of porn industry to society.

  • Heidi

    @deti –

    For the most part, I agree 100% with what you’ve suggested.  If she’s not attracted to you “sometimes,” it’s no different than a woman who has put on weight and let herself go… get thee to a gym, just as a woman should.  It’s BOTH your duty to make an effort to remain attractive to one another.

    The other stuff?  Totally hit the nail on the head.  And it’s all stuff I’ve suggested.  Stop being a damn pushover, and stop with the “what do YOU want to do” nonsense.  It’s annoying.

    In exchange, be explicit with what you want and expect from your partner.  Say, “Next Tuesday  is our date night.  You plan it.” She should put in as much effort as you have (ie, the “We’re going to such and such steakhouse, get a babysitter” thing).  Even sexual.  Send her a text… “I expect you naked in bed when I get home” or something sexy.

    I’m as “feminist” as they come, but even I respond to direct requests and demands.  I relish it.  There’s absolutely nothing asshole-ish about it.

  • deti

    @ Dark Side:

    “No you don’t need more vacations.  We can’t afford Marco Island.  It’s Myrtle Beach this year.”

    “No we aren’t going to the expensive place.  We’re going to the family place tonight.”

    “I’m not taking a second job.  We don’t need more money.  You need to rein in the spending.  If you cannot do it, I’ll do it for you.   If you can’t decide what needs to be cut, I’ll decide for you.”  

    “No I’m not going to marriage counseling.  I don’t need counseling.  You need to treat me with respect.  You need to stop acting like an idiot.  You are not a princess and you need to stop acting like one.    I need to tell you more often when you’re out of line.”

    “We need to stop talking about sex and start having it.   Now.”

    “This marriage is not just about what you want and need.  It’s also about what I want and need.  And I’m going to tell you exactly what I want, need and expect.   I want and need sex.  That’s what makes us married.  If you’re not willing to give me some things I want and need, then we need to discuss the future of this marriage.”

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Sorry. It just really pisses me off to be told that I wasn’t being a good enough husband, wasn’t communicating, wasn’t doing those special things that make her happy. All of that is lies; it doesn’t work. I did that stuff for ten years and got zero results. I was a jerk for 6 months and had women (my wife and several others) trying to rip my clothes off.

    Oh my god do I wish that women were they way Heidi and Hope say they are. I know how to turn women on now. I have tested it on several woman and it works. I HATE that it works. I feel like the guy in the Matrix movie who wished he could forget the truth and go back to the pretend world and believe all the lies again.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      I feel like the guy in the Matrix movie who wished he could forget the truth and go back to the pretend world and believe all the lies again.

      Heh, there’s a reason it’s called the red pill. Look, the truth is that in some ways you have also failed your wife. There’s plenty of blame to go around. Both of you were flying blind. Now you have good information, and you can decide how to use it. Don’t be too angry with her – she has her biological imperative and she is programmed to respond to dominance. As you see.

  • Heidi

    Turning to the Dark Side –

    I merely asked if you had talked about it.  Your previous posts indicated that you HADN’T, so it was a natural question to ask.  Forgive me for inquiring more about your situation before making rash judgments.

    Now that you’ve mentioned it, if you’ve talked to her about it (repeatedly), and she hasn’t changed, then you’re left with two choices.  1) deal with it and STFU, or 2) get out of the situation.

    I have a few guy friends in similar situations as yours, and I give them all the same advice… if you’ve tried talking about it and being direct with her and she hasn’t changed, you owe it to yourself to get out of that marriage.

    And to you, I extend the same advice.

    You’re with someone who disrespects you and doesn’t care about your well-being.  That isn’t a partner, that’s a mooch, and an ungrateful one at that.

    It also explains a lot about your anger, too.  I’d be just as effing angry as you are if you had tried all these things and your relationship is still shot.

    So, if you’ve tried all these things and she STILL hasn’t shown you the respect you (as her HUSBAND) should be granted, why are you still with her?  All you’re doing is fostering a relationship where you are resentful (and rightfully so), and from the sounds of it, one where she’s getting what she needs without giving anything in return.  Why torture yourself like that?

    Now that we’ve gotten a bit of your background (aka, your “nice guy” self), do you mind sharing the recent “asshole” moves you’ve been putting on her?  Are you still unhappy in the relationship?  If so, why?

  • Heidi

    For the record, I want to make it clear… I am NOT saying you’re not a “good enough” husband.  What I *AM* saying is that your wife is not at ALL meeting you halfway when it comes to this “partnership,” and you have EVERY right to be angry.

    I think I’m getting confused about what we’re all defining as “asshole” behavior.  The stuff deti posted (in 124 and 130) is not “asshole” behavior or “game” related. It’s honesty and communication, in my opinion.

  • anonymous

    Susan:  Yes, it’s like we’re all trying to get that free lunch.

    Baloney sandwich, yum.

    @ TttDarkSide

    She told me she needed MORE vacations, dinners, footrubs, backrubs. I needed to do MORE housework and do MORE of the childcare. She needed MORE money too, so I took a second job (was already making six figures). I tried all of this for a while, but that clearly didn’t work. Then she told me that this is just a natural part of marriage. That I should start watching more football instead of thinking about sex.

    Yeah, this is ridiculous! I’m so sorry you went through all of this bull! Incompetent therapists. What was SHE contributing in return for all of the vacations, dinners, footrubs, housework, etc.?

  • Hope

    “Hope and Heidi don’t seem to get it. GIVING HER WHAT SHE WANTED DIDN’T WORK. IT NEVER WORKED EVEN A LITTLE BIT, NOT EVEN ONCE IN A WHILE.”

    Calm down. You didn’t really make clear in your first posts what kind of wife you had. Now that you have, I can tell you what your first mistake was. You picked the wrong woman to marry, sad to say. She was hot though, wasn’t she?

    You’ve enabled her behavior by acquiescing to unreasonable demands (taking on a second job when you’re making six figures? WTF!). Your wife should have been the one to pamper and support and love you, not be giving out all these crazy demands like vacations and dinners.

    I don’t care if you think I’m BSing. I do all the cleaning and cooking in our household, I do the backrubs and footrubs on him, and our marriage is very harmonious because I’m low on demands and high on giving. My husband and I never fight about the little things. We came close to fighting after our first son was stillborn at 9 months and I had a miscarriage 3 months later. That’s all. Even a month after the stillbirth we still made love.

  • deti

    @ Dark Side:

    “:I HATE that it works. I feel like the guy in the Matrix movie who wished he could forget the truth and go back to the pretend world and believe all the lies again.”

    I love that it works.  It’s good to be the king.  I’m not going back to the way it was.  Not now, not ever.

    Want to know why it works?

    When you start standing up for yourself, being your own man, and not putting up with her shit, she knows that you aren’t afraid of her.  And if you aren’t afraid of her, then you aren’t afraid to be without her.   If you aren’t afraid to be without her, you could leave her.  You could replace her. 

    Do you have any idea what that does to a wife?  The thought that she’s not the special little snowflake she thought she was?  The idea that if she leaves, you’ll just get a new one?  The concept that she’s not the princess, ruler of all she surveys?

    Off the pedestal she goes.  She doesn’t have hubby Dark Side right where she wants him.  No, she’ll have to put forth some effort to get what she wants and needs.   The very thought that she will have to vie for attention and won’t get everything she wants will soak her panties just like when you first met her and she was just a girl you were dating.  She doesn’t get to rule the roost.   She wants YOU to rule the roost.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    I’m sorry Heidi and Hope. I know you two are being helpful and I probably misinterpreted your original messages anyway. I am not angry at you two. I am angry at all the lies that men hear from their mothers and the media and other women. The lies that I believed for so long, that to win her desire, you have to treat her with kindness, communication, commitment, gifts, and special favors. You have to make her life wonderful. The thing I hate the most, is that I want it to be true.

    The game I used lately is just straight Roissy and Roosh advice. Make sure she knows you have other options. Make sure she knows that the relationship is hanging by a thread. Stay late at the office. Get some lipstick on your collar. Act like you don’t care what she thinks. Notice her flaws and point them out. My version of Deti’s advice was:

    “I’m not going on any more vacations, at least not with you.”

    “I don’t like going out to dinner with you. I’ll just go by myself. Bye.”

    “I get it now. My sex life is my own problem. Don’t worry; I’ll take care of my own problems.”

    And my only child just turned 18. Perfect timing.

    Why am I not already divorced? Partially because I am hoping to find a way out of a lifetime alimony judgement (I probably won’t be able to avoid that). But also because I am convinced that *ANY* woman in my wife’s place would have been just as turned off by my attempts to give her all the things she wanted. I am not angry at my wife any more than anyone else. I am angry at the universe about what turns women on.

  • Hope

    “What was SHE contributing in return for all of the vacations, dinners, footrubs, housework, etc.?”

    I’m guessing she was a stay-at-home mother. Now, granted, motherhood is tough. But this woman sounds like she requires a strong hand (i.e. what Turning to the Dark Side refers to as “jerk” behavior) in order to behave. It sounds like he just let her rule and constantly caved in to what she demanded. Then he found a bit of “game” and is amazed that immature, childish and bratty women actually respond to and are turned on by a bit of authority and manliness.

    My husband doesn’t have to be a jerk to me because I have enough self-awareness to keep myself in check, and I never have to nag him or be bitchy to him because he does the same for himself. We both like fancy things, but we’re quite frugal when it comes to spending. We do our own share of the housework (he does all the yard, I do all the inside) without being asked. We respect each other and never raise our voices at each other, and we do what mature adults do, communicate, negotiate, compromise and work together as a team.

    My husband would have never put up with a woman like that wife for even a week. Before getting married I knew exactly what kind of standards I needed to live up to, and they had been my own standards as well. If he wanted to be a jerk to me, insult me and try to make me feel bad, I wouldn’t put up with that either. He is a man worthy of respect because he doesn’t put up with crap, but he doesn’t need to give out crap either. The “dark game” stuff is aimed at taming women who have no self-awareness nor maturity, and it does work, but I can’t imagine how exhausting it must be.

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    When you start standing up for yourself, being your own man, and not putting up with her shit, she knows that you aren’t afraid of her.  And if you aren’t afraid of her, then you aren’t afraid to be without her.   If you aren’t afraid to be without her, you could leave her.  You could replace her.

    Do you have any idea what that does to a wife?  The thought that she’s not the special little snowflake she thought she was?  The idea that if she leaves, you’ll just get a new one?  The concept that she’s not the princess, ruler of all she surveys?

    That makes her feel safe, valued, joyful, complete. Makes her respect you more, and makes her like herself and your relationship more.

     

  • Heidi

    Okay… so I’m getting a better understanding of this “dark game” bit.  It’s not “game,” it’s self-respect.  Respect yourself enough to NOT be taking advantage of.  And sorry, someone who has all these demands and gives NOTHING in return is totally taking advantage of you.  I don’t care if it your wife, best friend, or brother.  That person is toxic.

    Demanding respect =/= asshole.  It shows that you value yourself, and that confidence is important.  Why should your wife value you when you clearly don’t value yourself?

    I’m sorry you married a bitch.  Either learn to how to teach her how to treat you or get out.  You made this situation by marrying someone who didn’t respect you, but you can get out of it by demanding that respect now.

  • Heidi

    Ha… this is so funny.  I’m as “feminist” as they come, but I just a HUGE awakening as to this “game” thing via your situation, @Turning.  And I LIKE this.  I’ve NEVER understood why men tolerate naggy wives who belittle or mock them.  Or women who pick fights just to pick them?  OMG…. I have NEVER understood those guys that stay with them!

    But I think I do now… it’s about respect.  You must learn to respect yourself.  Once you’ve mastered that, learn the art of teaching others how to treat you.  There’s absolutely nothing “asshole-ish” about ANY OF THIS.  It’s very different than being a lying, cheating “player” type.  THAT’S an asshole.  All this that’s being mentioned?  RESPECT.

    Ugh… on behalf of my sex (like Susan said), I APOLOGIZE.  We aren’t ALL this bitchy, I promise.  Teach her, and if that doesn’t work GTFO and find someone who will respect you as a HUMAN, let alone a HUSBAND.

  • deti

    HOpe and Heidi:

    I disagree that what we’re talking about just upthread is “dark game” the way I understand it.  “Dark game” to me involves dark triad:  narcissism, thrill seeking, deception.  That’s hardcore pickup.  That’s lying through your teeth to a woman.  That’s cheating on a wife and flaunting it in her face.  I’m not down for that. 

    I’m all about pushing back when I need to.  All about calling her out on disrespect. Call it out, confront and correct.  All about showing dominance.  All about ignoring fitness tests.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Deti, Turning

      I agree this is not Dark Game. It’s just good LTR Game, there is no deceit or shady behavior, it’s totally honest. I think the confusion came because of the name Turning chose.

      In any case, some of the stuff you read is probably good, but only if you are already exhibiting self-respect With her. Otherwise, it just reinforces her position atop the pedestal.

  • anonymous

    @ Hope

    Ditto to all you wrote.

    >“What was SHE contributing in return for all of the vacations, dinners, footrubs, housework, etc.?”

    >>I’m guessing she was a stay-at-home mother.

    Is that the going rate for SAHs?   Vacations, dinners, backrubs? LOL

    What I’m asking is what was her end of the bargain besides benefiting from all of his hard work?

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    I really don’t have self respect issues. I am very outgoing, ambitious, and well adjusted in every other aspect of my life.

    I was just following the advice of the most popular books and relationship gurus: 5 Languages of Love, Ignite her Fire, Leo Buscaglia, Ian Kerner, my mother, etc. Their advice sounds like , “if she doesn’t warm up to you, you need to communicate better, help more, be kinder, be a better lover, find a way to reach her”.

  • Anacaona

    I am not the jealous type. I don’t think I’ve ever expressed jealousy to my husband, but then, he’s never given me reason to feel that way. The idea of him with another woman is intolerable – I am definitely not wired that way. If he ever cheated, our marriage would be over. Even if I wanted to stay, I couldn’t live with that.

    Cosign this, except that I’m the jealous type. I don’t know Susan I feel dirty myself just thinking about it. I’m possessive I offered him my body, heart and soul when he placed his ring in my finger. I wouldn’t be able to see him the same way if he wasn’t doing the same. Interesting enough connecting emotionally with another woman doesn’t bother me, unless he considers a brief emotional connection superior to ours and decided to divorce. But if he came home telling me he spent a nice day talking talking to a lady that got him, I would be very happy for him, as long he doesn’t start talking with that lady instead of me that is although I could deal with that if I had to.

    But the sex, even once, he would become a dick with legs and as noted before I was never turned on by a dick with legs. I will say if he wanted I would try to save the marriage for the sake of the children (or well our cat, science proof that cats do better in two owners households :)) but I’m sure as hell I won’t be getting any wet from him for a long time, we will need to start from zero again and see if he can become a man I can admire and trust again. I always told him if you are going to cheat make sure she is the most wonderful woman you meet, because you are keeping her.

    In this community if you get to have sex with every woman and they get to have sex with every man you are being evolutionarily helped as your sperm is most likely to impregnate a woman with a compatible immune system making a healthier baby, instead of taking 10,000 shots at an incompatible woman and finally knocking her up with a weak baby.

    Women can smell and taste a genetically compatible partner, specially during ovulation. In many environments a man had more chances of a healthy children if he was there taking care of the mother and kids than busy banging every fertile female. The reason why the spectrum exists, some men and women are more promiscuous than others is because it depends on where is the group located.

    @Sassy and SayWhat

    Did I mentioned that both hubby and me were moderately injured during the honeymoon? I’m just saying porn should come with a warning label “Don’t try this at home, we are professionals” ;)

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Did I mentioned that both hubby and me were moderately injured during the honeymoon

      Like Bella and Edward?

  • Desiderius

    “Yes, it’s like we’re all trying to get that free lunch.”

    I am not.

  • anonymous

    Anacaona

    The idea of him with another woman is intolerable – I am definitely not wired that way. If he ever cheated, our marriage would be over. Even if I wanted to stay, I couldn’t live with that.

    Cosign this, except that I’m the jealous type.

    But the sex, even once, he would become a dick with legs and as noted before I was never turned on by a dick with legs. I will say if he wanted I would try to save the marriage for the sake of the children (or well our cat, science proof that cats do better in two owners households :)) but I’m sure as hell I won’t be getting any wet from him for a long time, we will need to start from zero again and see if he can become a man I can admire and trust again. I always told him if you are going to cheat make sure she is the most wonderful woman you meet, because you are keeping her.

    Cosign!

    In this community if you get to have sex with every woman and they get to have sex with every man you are being evolutionarily helped as your sperm is most likely to impregnate a woman with a compatible immune system making a healthier baby, instead of taking 10,000 shots at an incompatible woman and finally knocking her up with a weak baby.

    Women can smell and taste a genetically compatible partner, specially during ovulation. In many environments a man had more chances of a healthy children if he was there taking care of the mother and kids than busy banging every fertile female. The reason why the spectrum exists, some men and women are more promiscuous than others is because it depends on where is the group located.

  • Heidi

    @susan and @deti –

    Thanks for clarifying.  I don’t like the “dark game” bit… I don’t like deception and lying in any forms. I also don’t like sex with random strangers (PUAs at the bar kinda activity).  But this demanding of self-respect I can most DEFINITELY get behind.

    @Turning –

    I realize you thought you were following the directions/advice in those popular books (which, admittedly, I’ve never read)… but do those books say to keep giving, giving, giving when you’re getting nothing in return?  It seems like the best thing you can do for yourself is to LOVE YOURSELF and part of loving yourself is learning that boundary between giving and receiving.  Any therapist worth their salt will tell you take care of yourself before you try to take care of anyone else (including your relationship).  And you can’t take care of yourself if you keep giving, giving, giving, you know?

    I’m sorry if you feel we are all ganging up on you here.  It’s not that we are.  I can’t speak for the other women here, but I have a genuine interest in seeing that you succeed in your relationship. And I hope that being a woman can help give you some perspective.

    So, what sorta “asshole” things have you been doing that have changed your wife’s response as of late?

  • Ceer

    Krauser just posted on this topica at krauserpua.com.  You can go over there and read his take.

  • Anacaona

    Like Bella and Edward?

    Heh I love you for this reference.It was the other way around I injured him more than he did to me.. But yeah… there were casualties, but like Edward I was completely mortified and I didn’t touched him for a few days even though he told me he was okay and that it was funny (he is a masochist me thinks) and I wasn’t even a twilight fan when I got married. :D

  • Heidi

    Oh, and this whole “pedestalizing” of a wife…. I only put my partner on a pedestal as high up as he puts me, and I expect the same from him.  If one “pedestalizes” their partner more than the other, there’s an uneven balance that sets up the relationship for failure.  That’s not a partnership, that’s more of a worship situation, which as a woman, is wholly unattractive.  Yes, it’s possible to be “loved too much.”  I’m not sure why it is this way, but I know guys who feel the same way.

    Ironically, I’ve had to teach my partner how to “love me less.” In reality, it’s just been me teaching him how to respect himself MORE.  It’s important to me that he be able to tell me no when I need it.  If I can’t trust him to be honest with me when it’s difficult, how can I trust him to be honest at all?  Mostly I’ve been teaching him to respect himself.  Oh, and to f*ck me senseless on occasion.  See deti’s comment #124, item #3, both A and B, please.  :)

    Being worshiped on a pedestal isn’t pleasing and not a quality I want from a PARTNER.

  • Hope

    @Turning to the Dark Side “I was just following the advice of the most popular books and relationship gurus: 5 Languages of Love, Ignite her Fire, Leo Buscaglia, Ian Kerner, my mother, etc. Their advice sounds like , “if she doesn’t warm up to you, you need to communicate better, help more, be kinder, be a better lover, find a way to reach her”.”

    I don’t know about the rest of them, nor did I ever read those books. I think the idea of languages of love applied to a healthy relationship between two mature adults it can work well. Sorry that it doesn’t work for your relationship.

    @deti “I disagree that what we’re talking about just upthread is “dark game” the way I understand it.”

    I didn’t say YOU were using “dark game.” Whether or not something is “dark” has a lot to do with a person’s attitude and intentions. The exact same action (for example squeezing your wife’s hands) can have distinctly different meaning depending on the context, mood, and intentions behind the action.

    When I just got out of the hospital with a horribly bruised hand from failed IV, my husband hurt my hand many times by squeezing it as he usually likes to do. But I didn’t get mad at all, because I know he didn’t mean to hurt me. He just forgot that he was holding the hurt hand.

    You see, just as my husband’s “hurting” me was not dark because he didn’t mean to hurt me, your “game” was not dark because your intention was to improve your marriage. This guy seems lost and flailing, and even his handle implies he is using “dark game,” though maybe his game may be more confused and chaotic than truly dark.

  • Heidi

    @Hope –

    Very insightful… I think you’re right, it has to do with intention.

    @Turning –

    Do you WANT to fix your marriage?  Can you forgive and move beyond your wife’s selfish and narcissistic behavior?

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    Do you WANT to fix your marriage?  Can you forgive and move beyond your wife’s selfish and narcissistic behavior?

    It should be about her fixing her own behavior, not about forgiving and moving beyond it.

  • GudEnuf

    Is anyone else getting an error message saying that HUS failed it’s certificate or something?

  • Anacaona

    Is anyone else getting an error message saying that HUS failed it’s certificate or something?

    It says gets your partnertested or something like it in my screen and I though it was my computer I had been running the freaking antivirus all day!

  • Heidi

    Yohami –

    Obviously SHE’LL need to fix her behavior, but it won’t matter a LICK what she does if he can’t or won’t move on from it, you know?

    Step one is figuring out if this is even salvageable.  Part of that is determining if @Turning can get over his anger.  If he can’t, then there’s no point… she won’t be able to do anything to fix the situation, you know?

  • Dogsquat

    Deti said:

    8.    Don’t put up with disrespect, in private or in public.  If she does in private, call her out on it immediately.   If she does it in public, even jokingly, when you get home you call her out on it, tell her exactly what she said or did, and tell her it’s not funny and you expect it not to happen again.  Don’t say your feelings were hurt.  Tell her she disrespected you.  Then, when it happens again, you do the same thing.   Lather, rinse, repeat.   Trust me, she will disrespect you again.  You just need to call it out every time.

    Deti, you are the shit.

    Some support and a further look:

    Don’t be afraid to call her ass out in public for disrespecting you, either.  The first time she does it, gut it and talk to her about it in private.  Next time, pull her aside right then, and tell her to cut it out.

    The best results I’ve had with this were with very relaxed body language, a calm vocal tone, and laser like eye contact held until she drops her eyes.

    I dated a new-grad nurse once who was regaling her non-medical friends about what idiots EMS people are at a party (to be honest, she had some good points, but was painting with a brush that included me – I am not an idiot).  I was sitting on the couch behind her, listening.

    Finally, I couldn’t take it anymore.

    “Hey, Girlfriend.  What do I do for a living?”

    “Uhh…you’re a paramedic.”

    “Yup.  Knock it off.”

    “Sorry,” she whispered, and she blushed so hard the tips of her ears turned purple.

    Neutral, conversational volume voice, no threatening body language.  Only thing different is the eye contact – and the willingness to flip her a twenty for a cab and walk right the fuck out of her life if she doesn’t indeed knock it off immediately. If she comes back at you with anything other than an apology, i.e. she’s justifying or trying to get the crowd on her side – just calmly leave.

    No drama.

    If there is no immediate, public apology, she just showed something about herself to you that is unacceptable, and you can find another, better woman.

  • Dogsquat

    Heidi said:

    “I think I’m getting confused about what we’re all defining as “asshole” behavior.  The stuff deti posted (in 124 and 130) is not “asshole” behavior or “game” related. It’s honesty and communication, in my opinion.”

    Heidi, the stuff Deti posted is Internal Game and Frame maintenance.

    Most men who do stuff like follow laws, pay their taxes, put their loved ones before themselves, respect women, and try and please them are absolutely not taught this stuff.  We’re taught the exact opposite – never demand, never insist, work harder, be nicer.  We’re like Boxer the Draft Horse in Orwell’s Animal Farm.  Instead of the catfood factory we get dumped or served with divorce papers.

    What Deti posted is a foreign language, and feels horrible and wrong at first.  Finding out that you’ve done everything wrong for decades causes a sense of anger, betrayal, despair, and even hate.  Most of us tried so hard, gave up so much, and went through so much pain – and then…this.

    Remember when you found out Santa wasn’t real, and the dog who was your best friend didn’t really go live on a farm (he got put down/hit by a car), and that you’re never going to be a princess/astronaut/pirate/superhero?

    This is fifty times worse.

  • Mike C

    <i>Why am I not already divorced? Partially because I am hoping to find a way out of a lifetime alimony judgement (I probably won’t be able to avoid that). But also because I am convinced that *ANY* woman in my wife’s place would have been just as turned off by my attempts to give her all the things she wanted. I am not angry at my wife any more than anyone else. I am angry at the universe about what turns women on.</i>

    Turning, I just skimmed the comment thread quickly, but I wanted to respond to you.

    Hey, welcome to the club (red-pillers).  Eventually, you’ll realize the bolded part is irrational.  You really aren’t angry at the universe about reality.  You are angry that society lied to you your whole life, maybe even your own Mom.  You can get past the stage you are at now.

    Whether your marriage is something worse trying to salvage I have no idea.  Only you can make that determination.  I see you have already discovered Roosh and Roissy.  Some good general stuff there, although to be honest I don’t read Roosh and not sure how applicable his stuff is to LTR game.  You should read Athol Kay-Married Man Sex Life, and read this ASAP.  Your story reminded me of this post:

    http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/08/14/relationship-game-week-a-readers-journey/

    Check out Rollo Tomassi’s blog as well:  http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/


    Good luck.  And I’ll leave you with this excerpt Rollo posted:

    <i>

    There is no going back.

    NEO: “There’s no going back now is there?
    MORPHEUS: “No. But if you could, would you really want to?”

    One dynamic I encounter from guys who’ve experienced the ‘community’ in varying degrees is a desire to go back to their previously comfortable, ignorant bliss. The reality they become exposed to is too much to bear and they spit the red pill back up. They want to plug themselves back into the Matrix.

    No person both frightens and disgusts me more than one who understands truth, but willfully opts for denial. It’s not the desire to do so that disgusts me, I understand the desire, it’s that there is no going back.</i>

     

     

  • MaMu1977

    Casual sex is like all-you-can-eat snack food at your local pub.
    Does it taste good? If your taste buds are conditioned to processed meals, yes.
    Does it fill you up? If you’re judging satiety by volume, yes.
    Is it as good as a holiday dinner with family, or a handmade meal by a person who’s crushing on you? Hell no!

    IME, the most-delicately catered meals with strangers has never tasted as good as the meals that I enjoyed with ladies who wanted to impress me/to earn my attention/to thank me for a bedroom job well done.

  • Mike C

    The best results I’ve had with this were with very relaxed body language, a calm vocal tone, and laser like eye contact held until she drops her eyes.

    Yup, in my experience the key is to not get angry or emotional but convey you are deadly serious.  This actually works with guys as well if they try to play you for a bitch.

    Too bad you and I can’t get together for a beer and swap bouncing stories, but thiis tactic became routine when dealing with someone getting unruly who you had to reign in.   Once they knew you were serious, then they would get all apologetic.  Sometimes, I wish I could ditch the cubicle dweller job and go back to that gig.  I actually think working that job helped to keep a good frame, but I get paid 4x more to be a spreadsheet jockey.

  • Dogsquat

    Dark Side, if you haven’t, please read this post by a guy who is beloved by medical students the world over:

     

    http://badgerhut.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/the-five-stages-of-game/

    There are lots of dudes that post on here who’ve been in a version of your shoes.  My advice to you is to be careful and disciplined about what you read.  It’s really, really easy to poison yourself now.  If I were you, I’d seek answers/behavior modification starting with the guys linked  here on Susan’s blog.  Read Rollo and early Roissy, too – but balance them with positive activities like exercise and personal achievement.  Those two can be hard to take if you’re at a low point, but they are right on about a lot of things.

    You’re going to be pissed off and angry for a long time.  Then you’ll be depressed as hell.

    I promise you:

    It gets better.

    Your job for the next three months should be to not cause a permanent, negative outcome for yourself.  Here are my suggestions:

    1. Don’t get an STD

    2. Don’t develop an addiction (booze, weed, benzos)

    3. Don’t get charged with anything (abuse, child neglect, DUI, date rape)

    4. Read reasonable Red Pill stuff, and observe the world around you with new eyes.  Before applying too much in your own relationships, build a new context for yourself by observing others.  Pay attention to the people around you.  Seriously – go to a mall, get a cup of coffee, sit on a bench, and just watch people.  Go to the grocery store, wander around, and eavesdrop.  You will be fucking amazed.

    5. Re-evaluate your own relationship at some point – I suggest 3 months.

    Lots of us are regular readers here.  I, for one, will help you if I can.  I’ll bet the other guys will, too.  Susan will probably not mind if you feel the need for another perspective on this stuff, so post a question.  This place is pretty good at helping guys through this stage, even though it’s not the intended purpose.

     

    Stay Careful and Stay Up,

    Dogsquat

  • Dogsquat

    Mike C:

    Too bad you and I can’t get together for a beer and swap bouncing stories, but thiis tactic became routine when dealing with someone getting unruly who you had to reign in.   Once they knew you were serious, then they would get all apologetic.  Sometimes, I wish I could ditch the cubicle dweller job and go back to that gig.  I actually think working that job helped to keep a good frame, but I get paid 4x more to be a spreadsheet jockey.

    I’ve never thought about the two things in conjunction (girls, controlling drunks), but you got steel on target with that one.

    The same light dawns in a girl’s eyes that dawns in a disruptive patron when the patron realizes you are quite willing to ratchet up the local pain level very quickly and without hesitation. With a drunk frat kid it’s gonna be a sore neck from being choked out or a quick head CT after being knocked the fuck out.

    With a girl, it’s finally realizing that she might never, ever, ever see or communicate with you again.

    Like you, I am so glad I was a bouncer. I think those years taught me a lot about humanity that I couldn’t have learned anywhere else.

    It’s not the money that keeps me from doing it anymore, though. It’s how many of those guys I transport lights and sirens to the ED. I was lucky as hell, and I’m kind of too chicken to fight anymore. Too much to lose, these days.

  • anonymous

    Dogsquat

    Heidi, the stuff Deti posted is Internal Game and Frame maintenance.

    Most men who do stuff like follow laws, pay their taxes, put their loved ones before themselves, respect women, and try and please them are absolutely not taught this stuff.  We’re taught the exact opposite – never demand, never insist, work harder, be nicer.  We’re like Boxer the Draft Horse in Orwell’s Animal Farm.  Instead of the catfood factory we get dumped or served with divorce papers.

    Be sure to hone those skills for when any of you decide to become fathers. Otherwise the kids will walk all over you. And that’s exactly the way you do it- calmly, directly and show them you mean business while still loving them to bits.  The skills are transferable to other areas of life.

  • Besu

    @Turning

    What did you start doing that you consider acting like a jerk?

    I often find that guys who previously put women on a pedestal start treating them like normal people instead of pretty, little houseplants, they consider themselves acting like assholes while the women perceives it as finally getting treated as human.

     

    “It’s important to me that he be able to tell me no when I need it.  If I can’t trust him to be honest with me when it’s difficult, how can I trust him to be honest at all? ”

    I think this gets right to the issue of both LTR “game” and the myth that women like bad guys.  The reality is that if someone can’t give you critique, he isn’t honest.  How can he protect me if he is not objective?

    I’ve actually asked a guy I was seeing to tell me about what he thought of me, positive and negative.  When he couldn’t think of one negative thing or give any constructive criticism, I immediately knew he was living in a fantasy world that was incompatible with my own and I couldn’t see him as relationship material.

    Women don’t like assholes, they like honest, objective men who respect themselves and can be vocal about their critiques.

  • Dogsquat

    Anonymous said:

    Be sure to hone those skills for when any of you decide to become fathers. Otherwise the kids will walk all over you. And that’s exactly the way you do it- calmly, directly and show them you mean business

    Fuck yeah!

    I’m gonna give ‘em a shot to the stomach, sweep the leg, then move to an armbar. GAIN PAIN COMPLIANCE! Then POW! Right into the exterior jugular with a preloaded syringe of Haldol, Ativan, and Benadryl.

    Little shits…won’t clean up their roommmumblemumblegrumpshowthem who’sbossgrumble

    I have saved a few kids lives, but I don’t think I should be allowed to have my own.

  • Besu

    “What Deti posted is a foreign language, and feels horrible and wrong at first. ”

    Wow!  That’s actually very strange to me.  I had no idea men were taught to abdicate all self respect for the sake of women.  Is this what men mean when they say they are “nice guys”?

    It almost seems ridiculous that a guy thinks that he can’t state what he wants.

    It almost makes sense now why men call women entitled.  Women who make their desires known are speaking to men who were being taught that they should never do that with the opposite sex.  They are doing it under the impression that it’s a two way street.  The men, on the other hand, under the impression that they can’t express their desires, are taking these expressions as demands instead of negotiations.

    This has been very enlightening.

     

    My fiance has always told me what he wanted.  He’s actually told me once that I needed to squat more.  He wanted me to have a bigger, rounder butt and he wasn’t going to wish it into existence.  My response: I hit the gym.  Simple.

    The only time this has been an issue is when he used to tell me that he was going out after work or with friends.  He would tell me (not ask me) but would say it in a way that implied that he didn’t really want to do it or was being forced or it wasn’t going to be a good time.  Eventually I got annoyed and just told him that when he’s going out, just tell me instead of trying to pretend it’s going to suck.  Be direct. It’s annoying otherwise.  He stopped doing that quick.  I’m glad because it was a total turn off.

  • Heidi

    Dogsquat –

    It’s terrible to hear that guys have been taught this… To give and give and give is a terrible way to ANYONE (regardless of gender) to live their life! Now, I’m as a woman, I obviously have no idea how a man would’ve been raised… But I’m so sorry it’s involved being told you’re not good enough and never will be. :( How do you EVER achieve balance and partnership with that kind of imbalance?

    I’m so sorry. I feel very fortunate to have been raised by women (and men!) who taught me to treat others the way *I* want to be treated, and to respect others. I also had it drilled into my head that I’m not better than anyone else and I had to earn respect from others. Reinforcing these basic rules for human interaction would’ve alleviated this “princess” mentality. It just seems to come down to common sense and respect on both parts.

    I like your suggestions to Turning… Particularly about balancing out his reading with both positive reading and positive activities. I’ve found the manosphere (which I only recently discovered) is littered with angry, woman-hating advice. There is definitely good advice out there, but letting that angry advice permeate your actions will result in you just appearing bitter and angry towards women… which definitely WON’T be getting you laid.

    @Dark side, channel the (somewhat justifiable) anger into positive energy while you learn how to respect yourself and while you learn how to teach others to respect you, too. Don’t let anger lead your actions. Do come here to vent and share… I’m genuinely curious about your future.

  • Dogsquat

    Besu said:

    Wow!  That’s actually very strange to me.  I had no idea men were taught to abdicate all self respect for the sake of women.  Is this what men mean when they say they are “nice guys”?

    That’s a pretty simplified version of what actually takes place, but the short answer is….yes.

    Watch a romantic comedy.  Who ends up with the girl?

    Ask a girl what she wants in a man.  She’ll say nice, funny, tall, financially stable, and  smart.

    No where in there does she say that she needs a man who is willing to tell her “NO” once in awhile.  No where in there does it say that she needs a man with a mission in life – a mission that doesn’t necessarily include her.  No where in there does it say anything about the man having the respect of others, including her.

    To the girl, that goes without saying.  The guy has no idea about this part of the deal.  Nobody tells him.

    He breaks his ass to achieve his goal of a good woman he’s attracted to.  The lucky ones figure out they’re doing it bass ackwards.

     

     

  • Heidi

    Yeah, everything Besu said… we thought saying what you want is a two way street… No WONDER you call us entitled.

    Enlightening, indeed. What a sucky way to live!

  • Dogsquat

    Heidi said:

    To give and give and give is a terrible way to ANYONE (regardless of gender) to live their life!

    This statement isn’t necessarily true in all respects.

    I have the soul of a servant. I am most fulfilled when benefiting others. I have done some horrible things that I seek to balance somehow. I need to give to people, or I’ll end up shooting myself in the face.

    I’ve learned, though, that the person/people I need to give to is/are not the women in my life. A little is okay, but unleashing my personal angst on someone is not productive, nor conducive to anyone’s happiness.

    Many guys out there are similar to me, if not as driven/twisted that way by life. They’ve been raised on team sports, activities involving shared suffering, and sacrificing for the greater good.

    Throw a normal girl into that, and the guy seems too cheesy. Put an entitled princess (any variety – there are many) who can push his buttons, and the guy slips complacently into slavery. It never occurs to him that there’s another way to live life, other avenues for his energies. When the suffering brings no reward, the constant brutal labor bears no fruit – then, the guy turns into a “Nice Guy”.

    He’s not nice, though – he’s misguided, brainwashed, and counter-productive.

    I agree with your basic statement, though:

    It’s pretty fucked up.

  • Heidi

    Bah… But what kills me isn’t that women are too stupid to say what they want or not, it’s that this is completely a foreign way of thinking, so we don’t know how to verbalize it. “Don’t be a nice guy” sounds too trite and trivial, in addition to inaccurate. I like (LOVE) nice guys. I *do not* love doormats with no self-respect.

    Tell me, where did you learn this behavior? Can you remember specific examples either from childhood or adulthood that cultivated this character trait? I’m truly fascinated now, and hope to (as much as I can as a teacher) MOT perpetuate this myth. I’m curious if you think there are times in your childhood that you can remember this myth of the “nice guy” being reinforced.

    Thanks in advance for your insight. :)

  • Besu

    Yes, I’d also love to hear specific examples of where this is taught.  Very fascinating!

    “Many guys out there are similar to me, if not as driven/twisted that way by life. They’ve been raised on team sports, activities involving shared suffering, and sacrificing for the greater good.”

    The thing is, I was raised on team sports.  (soccer, lacrosse.  MVP and captain for both. yippie! college cheerleader too but wasn’t as into it)  Anyway, I was always taught that you self-sacrifice in a bind.  But always regroup and debrief to come up with a game plan where you are all contributing.  If you aren’t contributing or even trying, you aren’t a team player.  My coach would remove you or punish you.  You would be shunned.  I don’t think team sports teaches martyrdom.  If anything, I was pushed more to self-sufficient martyrdom with my gifted and AP classes.  Sports seemed to reinforce the opposite.  Not discounting your experiences, just my perspective.

  • Isabel

    Reddit is not as atypical as you think. :/

    Not like it’s 4Chan or anything. They have a subreddit for almost everything (including MRA and PUA) and it’s been mainstream for pretty much the last two or three years now. I’d say it’s a *lot* closer to the average young person’s mindset than most of the sensationalised crap the media puts out. And I agree with whoever said women over-value their emotional depth relative to men further upthread. ^ But tbf, it’s not like we have any real clues to go by. Most men suppress their emotional expression to appease society’s weird ideals and even the clued-up red pill men suspect we’re ‘projecting’ if we say hooking-up is shitty for men’s mental health too. The effects are more delayed but they’re still there, no? Anyhow, it’s sucky that young men have to base a good chunk of their value as men/humans on how successful they are with women.

    @ GudEnuf

    1# is the worst by far. Because at least with #2, you can kid yourself that his forebrain was disengaged and that it was all mechanical. The first option is a conscious betrayal. Either way, he’d better get used to sleeping with one eye open. -_-

  • deti

    “Neutral, conversational volume voice, no threatening body language.  Only thing different is the eye contact – and the willingness to flip her a twenty for a cab and walk right the fuck out of her life if she doesn’t indeed knock it off immediately. If she comes back at you with anything other than an apology, i.e. she’s justifying or trying to get the crowd on her side – just calmly leave.”

    Oh yes indeed.  We loves us some Dogsquat.

    I actually saw a guy do this once.  Don’t even know them.  This man and his girl were at a nice restaurant.  She’s giving the waiter a hard time, complaining all over the place.   They finish the meal without a word.  He pays the check.  He tosses a bill across the table at his girl, calmly says “that’s for cab fare”, and nonchalantly pushes back from the table and strides out.  She looks around, waits a beat or two, and scurries out after him. 

    Wonder how that went down later.

  • deti

    @  Heidi:  

    “Tell me, where did you learn this behavior? Can you remember specific examples either from childhood or adulthood that cultivated this character trait? I’m truly fascinated now, and hope to (as much as I can as a teacher) MOT perpetuate this myth. I’m curious if you think there are times in your childhood that you can remember this myth of the “nice guy” being reinforced.”

    Males begin learning this as young boys.  Usually comes from:

    1.   His mother telling him to calm down, be nice, and be respectful.   It doesn’t get much better as he reaches his teen years.  Mothers assume their sons will get girls just because of their maleness.  She wants the best for her son and thinks the best of him too.   But, she worries for him.  She doesn’t know how to help him contain himself.   She thinks she has to temper her son’s wild stallion or he’ll get killed, thrown in jail, kicked out of school, or other terrible things will happen.   She also doesn’t know herself what she likes in men or can’t articulate it.   She just knows what makes her comfortable in a man (not what ATTRACTS her, what COMFORTS her.)   So she tells her son things like “be nice.  Be yourself.  Be respectful.  Be calm.  Do what she asks you to do.”

    2.    His father who is himself a NiceGuy (TM), from years of his own mother doing #1 to him, from working a job that literally sucks the life out of him, and from having to conform to a blue pill world.   It’s even worse if he doesn’t live with his boy, as is the case half the time. 

    3.    Teachers who have a classroom to control and things to get done.  So she tells the boys to “CALM DOWN!”  and reports them to other teachers, principals and authority figures when they “act up”. 

    4.   Physicians who misdiagnose maleness as ADHD and overprescribe Ritalin, all to calm down boys who are doing nothing other than simply being boys.

    5.     Pastors who tell boys they are sinning grievously when they masturbate (and this to boys who have no other sexual outlet whatsoever), and again tell boys that to get girls they have to “be nice”.  Open the door for ALL women.  You must show respect to ALL women, even when they don’t show it back.   You have to represent Jesus to them, even when they won’t be Mary and Martha.  You must be nice even when they are not nice to you.   Oh, and if you are these things, Christian girls will fall all over themselves to be with you.  (This is one of the most dastardly lies ever perpetrated on young Christian boys and men.  I think Christian women are EVEN MORE hypergamous, fickle and bitchy than nonChristian women.   Don’t know why for sure.)

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    Is anyone else getting an error message saying that HUS failed it’s certificate or something?

    I get it on Mozilla Firefox, but not on Google Chrome.

  • PBateman

    @ Turning

    “Their advice sounds like , “if she doesn’t warm up to you, you need to communicate better, help more, be kinder, be a better lover, find a way to reach her”.”

    Oh that just makes me cringe. Don’t listen to anyone who tells you that you need to try more of the same behaviour with a woman. Ever. She needs to start meeting your standards. Don’t ever cross over the line from what’s reasonable behaviour for a man. It’s about self-respect.

    If you start “gaming” women, the same applies. Don’t become a clown running all over the bar playing the numbers game. That’s not reasonable behaviour for any man either. It’s about self-respect.

  • Celeste

    @DarkSide

    Seems like many of the female commenters here keep suggesting that you should have “beta-ed up more.”  From what I have read in the manosphere, this is typical female advice, but rarely works.  Correct me if I’m wrong folks, but I’ve learned that women want beta attention from an alpha.  So you have to be alpha first.  I for one think you did much more than could ever be reasonably asked, and that you are well rid of your ex.

  • Esau

    “Tell me, where did you learn this behavior? Can you remember specific examples either from childhood or adulthood that cultivated this character trait?”

    Don’t forget how people are taught through negative examples.   IME, women in general are constantly complaining about the shortcomings of the men they desire: he doesn’t call, he’s always late or flaking, he doesn’t pay attention to what she wants (according to this classic post http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/05/19/be-a-skittles-man/ Skittles are actually the gift of champions), or is generally a self-centered jerk.  Naturally, a simple-minded boy who hears enough of this stuff could easily conclude that his best strategy is <i>not</i> to be like those guys, and so start going out of his way to be considerate and attentive.  (This fails, of course; what he simple-mindedly fails to realize, is that the near-universal female complaints about jerkish behavior indicate that jerkish behavior is closely correlated with getting girls; ie chicks did jerks, soon to be a Broadway musical).  Feminists go on and on and on about how “rape culture” is the worst thing ever to come out of the human race; naturally, a young man hearing this might think it a good idea to showcase how gentle and non-threatening he is (tactical mistake, of course; “harmless” is the worst epithet a woman can apply to a man).

    And so on and so on.  Just as Celeste wrote above, conspicuously avoiding behaviors that women complain about is, effectively, “typical female advice, but rarely works”.  Women like Heidi go on and on about how there’s a big and obvious distinction between being kind and lacking self-respect; but that’s false, and it’s false for the very specific reason that women (in general) have a hair-trigger reflex to (mis-)intepret kindness as weakness.  The problem is primarily on the woman’s side, but she’ll still find a way to blame it on the man nonetheless, and so the dysfunctional cycle continues.

     

     

  • Ted D

    @ Heidi – “Tell me, where did you learn this behavior? Can you remember specific examples either from childhood or adulthood that cultivated this character trait? I’m truly fascinated now, and hope to (as much as I can as a teacher) MOT perpetuate this myth. I’m curious if you think there are times in your childhood that you can remember this myth of the “nice guy” being reinforced.”

    I was raised by a single mother.  She truly worked her ass off to make sure I didn’t want for much, but in the 70’s it wasn’t easy for a single mother to get by.  We lived with my grandparents most of my childhood out of necessity.  My grandfather, although present, really didn’t get involved in my upbringing. (Much later in life, he told me that he sometimes wanted to, but didn’t feel it was his place since I wasn’t his son…), and other than two uncles that didn’t last until my 18th birthday (both of my aunts ended up divorced before I graduated high school) I had very few good male role models growing up.

    My mother always told me growing up how I needed to respect women and treat them nicely.  Never take advantage, never use my aggressiveness on them.  She told me to be kind, supporting, and comforting.

    I also attended a Catholic school from 1st through 6th grade.  Almost all of the teachers were nuns, and every one of them seemed to take delight in smacking the boys down.  I can remember being punished for all kinds of things that looking back were clearly just male behavior.  We were punished for “playing too hard” at recess on occasion because we would get dirty playing football or something similar.  We were made to sit inside while the girls got to go out and roam around the garden and quietly enjoy the fresh air the next day.  My mother thought it was good for me to learn how to “behave”, so she did nothing to counteract or prevent this.

    Of course my grandmother contributed a lot as well.  She and my grandfather got along OK, but him being “old school” there were times when tension between them was high.  I see now that much of it was my grandfather actually being a man, but my grandmother and mother used him often as the example of what NOT to be as a husband. “He doesn’t care about what we think.  He is grumpy and only does things his way.  He won’t listen to us…”  He was a good guy, but I really didn’t come to understand this until many years after he was no longer a part of my life.

    In addition, look around and you’ll see so many examples of the Nice Guy(TM) that it will amaze you.  Watch just about any romantic comedy or sitcom, and you’ll see examples of the “goofy dad” and the “empowered mother” that actually runs the household while letting the man “think” he does.  Our society also punishes normal male behavior in many ways.  We are told that aggression is bad.  We are told that sexual attraction is bad.  As in, you can’t tell a women at the office she “looks nice” without possibly causing a sexual harassment suite.  I’ve been in so many corporate “diversity and sensitivity” training classes I can’t count them.

    All the while, young women are being told to “be whatever they want”.  That they can do anything.  That they are worthy.  That they should be independent and strong.

    I was essentially raised to be some woman’s security blanket.  I’m sure my mother didn’t intend that.  I’m sure if I had a solid male role model that things would have been better.  But in the end, my mother, like every other women in my life growing up, tried to teach me to be what they “thought” they wanted from a husband.  The problem is, I don’t think any of them knew.  And, judging by my mom and aunts, their track record kinda proves it…

  • Aaron1988

    I’m a 22 year old guy and I have turned down every offer I have ever had for a one night stand/FWB. I have never had and never will have a one night stand/FWB because to me its called making love for a reason; that reason being that you genuinely love and deeply care about the person you are with (although saying this I have never really got to this stage in a relationship before I felt I had to “put out” for her or risk losing her hence why I’m now WTM as this is one of my many reasons for WTM) I hate casual and I can’t even kiss someone until we are bf and gf and not just dating, to me anything intimately physical such as kissing should only ever be in a relationship but that is just what feels right for me, I don’t judge others as they are doing what they feel is right for them (hopefully).

    -Aaron

  • Dogsquat

    Heidi said:

    “Tell me, where did you learn this behavior? Can you remember specific examples either from childhood or adulthood that cultivated this character trait? I’m truly fascinated now, and hope to (as much as I can as a teacher) MOT perpetuate this myth. I’m curious if you think there are times in your childhood that you can remember this myth of the “nice guy” being reinforced”

    I’m about your age.  Remember way back before cell phones and the internet, people would call each other on the house landline?

    When I was in 8th grade, a girl named Julie (we’ll call her that, for that is her real name) would call my house over and over and over.  She obviously had a crush on me, but when I’d say,”Hi!” and try and start a conversation, she’d be silent or answer in one word sentences.  It was lame, and I wasn’t attracted to her at all.

    She got to calling so much that my dad got pissed.  He told me to get her to quit it.  You don’t fuck around with Dogsquat, Sr. – when he says “Jump!” you ask “How high?” on the way up.  So, it was left to me to end the phone calls.

    One day at school, I screwed up my courage and politely asked Julie to stop calling.  I promise you I did this in private, and in a neutral, polite way.  I’d just moved to a new school and had been bullied at my previous one (only white kid in class) and was very sensitive about feelings, etc.  I was very careful (I thought) not to hurt her feelings – but I needed her to stop calling so much or my dad was gonna put an end to it himself.

    She got very angry and embarrassed.  I felt bad, but I felt I had done the needful.  A few days later, she ran up to me in the hall at school, pushed me in the chest, and said something like,”My boyfriend just got out of a mental institution!  He’s got a blade and he’s gonna cut you, asshole!  He’s gonna fuck you up ’cause you’re an asshole!”

    I asked,”If you’ve got a boyfriend, why have you been calling my house so much?”

    In retrospect I should have questioned her verbiage.  Got a blade?  Who talks like that?  This was the nineties, not the thirties…But I digress.

    Young Julie kicked me right in the balls.  I had no idea that was coming.  On my way to doubling over, I pushed her in the chest.  She staggered back and fell on her butt.  I vomited and lay in the fetal position for a time.

    To make a long story short, I had to go to the school counselor for “anger management”.  I was suspended for three days, even though the girl had pushed/kicked me first.  She’d told the counselor I was mean to her, blah blah blah.  The counselor also told me I should have been nicer to Julie, because she was having a tough time at home.

    Knowing what I know now, I suspect Julie had a budding case of Borderline Personality Disorder or something.  My parents were pissed.  My dad was initially on my side, but my mother was an old hippie and was incensed that I had “resorted to violence” and actually laid hands on a girl, so they never fought the school on it.  My dad also didn’t approve of laying hands on a girl.

    For a long time, I thought I’d actually handled that situation incorrectly – that I should have done something different.  That’s what my mom, my Dean at school, and the school counselor (all female, by the way) told me – and I believed them.

  • Ramble

    Hey Dogsquat, considering how large government regulated/funded/controlled organizations (like schools) operate, and how they go about paying their staff (i.e. salary based on years, tenure, almost guaranteed employment, very little competition), and the likely regulations that they will need to meet (State-wide curriculum, State sanctioned books, few expulsions, etc), and the people who are likely going to desire these types of “careers”…

    …how likely do you think that future schools, regardless of current cultural changes, will NOT lean, at least slightly, toward the female imperative?

    This is an honest question.

     

  • GudEnuf

    @Isabel So if a man wants to have an LTR with a woman, he has to abandon his platonic female friends? That sounds really controlling.

    I have female friends that I am very close to and I would not dump them just to appease a girlfriend.

  • Isabel

    GudEnuf,

    @Isabel So if a man wants to have an LTR with a woman, he has to abandon his platonic female friends? That sounds really controlling.

    I have female friends that I am very close to and I would not dump them just to appease a girlfriend.

    Um… no? When did I ever say that? That wasn’t in the original question or my reply. Both scenarios started with “a man meets a woman at a party and he…” and that’s it. It had nothing to do with platonic friends. What kind of half-assed fascist do you take me for? =/

  • Isabel

    Oh crap. My bad, GudEnuf. I misread the question as he *did* take her contact details in 1# so I have to revise my answer to #2 being worse now. Sorry. >.<

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    And it is not just our moms and teachers and principals telling men to “be nice” to women. “Be Nice” is the main theme of the most popular books for people with relationship problems. Examples that I read and followed while trying to fix my marriage:

    The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love That Lasts

    The Sex-Starved Marriage: Boosting Your Marriage Libido: A Couple’s Guide by Michele Weiner-Davis

    Light Her Fire: How to Ignite Passion, Joy, and Excitement in the Woman You Love by Ellen Kreidman

    She Comes First: The Thinking Man’s Guide to Pleasuring a Woman by Ian Kerner

    I know. Now those titles make me physically ill too.

    Also, I went to some discussion boards and asked women what to do. Got more of the same kind of advice about doing the right things to reach her heart.

    I realize now that 99% of women have no idea what turns them on. I have no doubt that every woman who gave me advice was banging a man who was doing precisely the opposite of her advice.

    So anyway, 1000 variations of “Be Nice” is the only relation advice men got, before the manosphere came into existence.

  • http://badgerhut.wordpress.com Badger

    Had more and better sex with her in the last 6 months of my being an asshole and openly flirting with other women…This is bringing my marriage to an end, which is fine with me.

    Does anyone else see the irony here?”

    I posted a few weeks back about a woman who faked an affair with her spouse (they showed up to a bar to “bump into each other” under self-styled personas) and wound up pounding like bunnies in the back of their minivan.

    http://badgerhut.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/faking-an-affair-with-your-spouse-for-fun-and-profit/

    It was wildly weird (not ironic, but beyond that) that the best way for this couple to have hot sex was to pretend they weren’t a couple.

    I second Dark Side’s entire first comment on the matter. I don’t want to be rough, but being rough is what works, and that’s what makes nice guys turn contemptuous of women. The alpha-beta balance is very difficult if you weren’t born with the right balance to begin with.

     

  • Ramble

    I don’t want to be rough, but being rough is what works, and that’s what makes nice guys turn contemptuous of women.

    When I was in college I broke up with a girl who I had been dating for over a year. Ultimately, we decided to keep “dating” for another week and half until the Thanksgiving break.

    In the proceeding week and half I basically did not give a fuck as to how I treated her in bed and she told me that I should have been doing that all along. She loved it.

  • Heidi

    Dogsquat –

    From a teacher perspective, your story ENRAGES me. For starters, my mother would’ve been FURIOUS with me if I was constantly calling some boy.  Where was this girl’s parents?

    Secondly, an 8th grader threatening you with her mental institution boyfriend? She had something going on.  I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you’re telling the story as unbiased as you can, but even with a slight bias, this chick was mental.

    Third, any form of violence towards another student is just that… VIOLENCE.  It’s not tolerated regardless of gender.  I hate that I would’ve had to suspend you (even for using self defense)… and that’s part of the reason I don’t teach anymore.  I can’t stand the bullshite.  But I would’ve suspended her, too!  She kicked you!  What shite administrator let her get away with that?!?

    Ugh… I hate that everyone is equating this with “nice.”  This isn’t NICE.  This is pushover behavior that shouldn’t be acceptable in ANYONE.

    This brings up another thing that angers me… violence against men.  I used to hit guys (“playfully”) when I was younger because it’s what you do, right?  I did that to one of my best friends (to this day), and with the same strength I hit him, he hauled out and hit me back.  (This was when I was 22 and he was 26.)

    I was shocked.

    But I’ll tell you what… I never so much as laid a hand on anyone again.  I was embarrassed and angry, but he was right.  He did what a woman would do back to me if hit.  Why should it be any different?

    To this day, we’re still very close friends.  Last year, he confided in me that it was one of his worst memories, and he’s hated himself for reacting that way.  To me, I only vaguely remember the incident, but for him it’s been eating him up.

    Really, he did what anyone – regardless of gender – would’ve done.

    This is what kills me about the whole “Snooki” hitting incident.  You don’t have watch the show (for the record, I DON’T) to know that Snooki got hit in the bar by a man.  Everyone was up in arms about this to which I kept responding… “It doesn’t matter that she’s a woman.  SHE’S A HUMAN, and NO PERSON SHOULD BE HIT BY ANOTHER PERSON.”  THAT is real feminism… equality, not superiority.

  • Sassy6519

    Correct me if I’m wrong folks, but I’ve learned that women want beta attention from an alpha.  So you have to be alpha first.

     

    As hard as it may be to hear, this is true. I stated on another thread that most women’s fantasy is for a natural alpha male to be nice to them and to date only them. The problem with this fantasy is that the very characteristics that make certain men natural alphas (Ex: high testosterone level, high physical attractiveness, female validation) also make them less likely to either commit to one woman or to be kind to women in relationships. The other problem is that natural alpha men are rather scarce (10%-20%).

    I have run into a few natural alpha males, and they blew me away for all the wrong reasons. Most were very emotionally cold. They had enough charm to sway the average woman, but I saw through the phony facade and noted that their personalities were crappy before getting involved with them. Others were surprisingly in “relationships” (I use the term loosely for their scenarios) with women who weren’t much better. Some of the women had cheated on them, some were in open relationships with these men despite the men saying that they really didn’t want that, and most of the women involved with these men were just as cold as they were. I wonder if this is of some significance.

     

  • Ted D

    And that is a real issue. I have NEVER not given a shit about how I treat a woman in bed. EVER! I have never simply gone at sex with only my concerns, enjoyment, and pleasure in mind, until recently. After getting over my anger and repulsion (yes, the idea that a woman WANTS to be used for a man’s pleasure repulses me…) at what I learned after taking the red pill, I’ve done my best to try on occasion to just “go for mine”. My SO loved it. To this day, it still sickens me a little. This goes SO against what I believed of women that it rocks me to the core. My entire life I believed that this was objectifying a woman sexually, which of course is wrong by any PC standard. But, in the end, it seems to be what women want. BUT, they only want to be objectified by men they find attractive! How the hell are men supposed to work with that?!

  • Heidi

    @Badger –

    I LOVE LOVE LOVE role playing with my boyfriend.  (Hint: my real name isn’t Heidi, but it IS the name of the hot red-head who often inhabits my bed during Fantasy Girlfriend weekend.)

    However, I’m curious about this:

    I don’t want to be rough, but being rough is what works, and that’s what makes nice guys turn contemptuous of women. The alpha-beta balance is very difficult if you weren’t born with the right balance to begin with.

    Define “rough.”  I’d also like Dark Side to define his “asshole-ish” behavior.  A lot of what you all are mention isn’t asshole behavior.  It’s simply YOU standing up for yourselves (I call it respect, but call it what you want).

    Stop saying you’re behaving like assholes.  You’re not, (this is directed to all of you), unless you’re lying, cheating, demeaning, or demoralizing your girlfriends/wives.  And the behavior you’ve mentioned is NONE OF THAT.

  • Anacaona

    @Heidi

    Maybe we should do a definition of asshole from male and female POV. I’m getting the feeling we are in another miscommunication by gender, but we haven’t had Jess come here. She actually did called Deti’s behaviour with his wife assholish and wrong I think GudEnuf also agreed with her (sorry if that was not true I do remember Jess getting support by other women here) so I guess there is 4 definitions of asshole: a man’s, a woman, and a feminist and a Pua’s.

  • Heidi

    @Ted D –

    I really want more details about how you “go for yours.” I realize, Susan, this might lead to some graphic info, which I can understand might be too much.  I’m just, in all honesty, fascinated.  I think about my own fantasies and think that while they involve my boyfriend “having his way” with me, it’s more because he just can’t resist me, and less because it’s violent or offensive.

    I hope that makes sense.  Just curious about all this new info I’m learning.  :)

  • Anacaona

    I’m just, in all honesty, fascinated.  I think about my own fantasies and think that while they involve my boyfriend “having his way” with me, it’s more because he just can’t resist me, and less because it’s violent or offensive.

     

    Had you read romance genre? I mean aside Twilight. Most of the “rape” fantasy of a man that takes a woman is about that, she is so incredibly seductive that he can’t control himself there is an industry that makes millions of this kind of plot is very normal, feminists hate it and try to deny it, but this is a very common fantasy for women around the world.

  • Heidi

    @Anacaona-

    Damn, that’s too bad they haven’t chimed in.  I’d really like to hear from people who argue that this is asshole-ish behavior.  I could *MAYBE* see it being such if the person in question hadn’t communicated this (or attempted to communicate) with his or her partner.  Communication is key.

    But saying the things deti says above (“We can’t afford a trip to the Caribbean, we’re going to Myrtle Beach instead” or “I make six figures… I don’t need a second job, we have a spending problem”) are all signs of communicating with one’s partner.

    I guess that’s why I’m asking for such detail as to what these men are doing that they believe is “asshole” behavior.  Because with specific instances, we could say, “Okay, yes, that’s an asshole move, it’s unfortunate your wife responds positively to it” rather than just assume she now loves assholes.  Does that make sense?

  • Heidi

    @Anacaona –

    I don’t read romance (aside from Twilight, which I read — all of them! — because I like to know what my students are reading, lol), but I’m a highly sexual individual and quite aware of the rape fantasy that exists.

    Like I said, I consider myself a feminist, and most of my friends would classify themselves the same (men and women alike).  And MOST of those friends share this fantasy.  Those that don’t, do not begrudge those who do.  So I think it’s unfair to say, “Feminists hate this.”  Yes, there might exist some extremists (because extremists exist in any organization or belief, really), but from my experience, “mainstream” feminists do not.

  • Anacaona

    Well this is mostly the “faces of feminism”, marcotte, jezebel and feministing. I’m only speaking of the ones that people remember and that use the mantle of feminism every single time they can. We keep hearing about this open minded feminists you talk about but the truth is they are not a strong presence and they are never to be seen when mysandrist laws are passed on or/and when mysandrist articles are published so for all intents and purposes all feminists are like that.

    I was having this discussion with Octavia recently that also resented that we were lumping her with Marcotte and the likes, but really if you are a silent majority you are silent there is no point in counting you (generally you), you don’t affect mainstream, YMMV

  • Ted D

    @ Heidi – No worries, I can answer you without any graphic description at all.

    Here is the deal.  When I am normally involved in a sexual act, I spend most of the time thinking about my SO.  Is she enjoying it?  Am I going to fast/slow?  Basically I spend a fair amount of time during sex concentrating on my performance, up until the final rush that is.

    By “go for mine”, I mean that I totally put all that off and simply have sex.  I concentrate on doing what I want, how I want, and unless I’m given some kind of instruction (which hasn’t occurred yet…) that is how it goes start to finish.

  • Hope

    Eh, I never told Dark Side to go “beta.” I said giving flowers and food DON’T arouse a woman. And those are commonly said to be beta behaviors.

    What is sexy: being dominant, masculine, strong, assertive, self-assured, masterful authority, taking charge inside bedroom and out, making decisions, and being the leader.

    I grew up in patriarchal Asia where little girls were not said to be princesses but were told to behave, work hard and be servile. The woman pleases and serves the man, not the other way around. This may be changing with westernization though.

    Sorry that you guys got loads of lies growing up. I was wired to be very giving and to do stuff for the man, which my husband really likes. Maybe I would be considered a doormat or too submissive, but it’s my choice. My husband wears the pants in our marriage, and we both know it and are very happy with it.

  • Sassy6519

    Here is the deal.  When I am normally involved in a sexual act, I spend most of the time thinking about my SO.  Is she enjoying it?  Am I going to fast/slow?  Basically I spend a fair amount of time during sex concentrating on my performance, up until the final rush that is.

    By “go for mine”, I mean that I totally put all that off and simply have sex.  I concentrate on doing what I want, how I want, and unless I’m given some kind of instruction (which hasn’t occurred yet…) that is how it goes start to finish.

    I must be weird, but that scenario doesn’t seem pleasant at all. Your wife might like it, but I think I, and a few other women on this site, are of a different breed.

    Nothing turns me on more than the thought of mutual pleasure. I get turned on the most when I know I am bringing my partner pleasure, and I hope it’s the same for any man I’m involved with.

    I’m starting to get the gist that women who value the primitive aspects of men over other qualities (Ex: “asshole” behavior, aloof demeanor, extreme dominance, self-interest focused sex) perhaps aren’t that evolved themselves. Perhaps women who are addicted to alpha “asshole” behavior are women whose reproductive and relationship imperative isn’t beyond the grasp of ancient women.

    I know men are going to come back and say “All women are like this”, but perhaps that just means I’m an outlier. I don’t know anymore.

     

  • Hope

    @Ted D, you mean you stopped WORRYING about your performance and started ENJOYING the act? No wonder it got better for both of you. As Sassy said, she gets turned on when the man is getting pleasure. The man has to initiate to get the cycle started. That’s the essence of the masculine energy.

    Sexy is: the masculine, dominant and outward energy meeting with the feminine, submissive and receiving energy. The man “being in the moment” (my husband’s phrase) during sex and letting go of his worries will positively affect the woman. Her sympathetic response will have her enjoying it more, which causes him to enjoy it more, and the feedback loop will be going up toward more positive energies exchanged.

    There’s more to this from a spiritual perspective, but it’s not necessary to understand this dynamic. I think most people can agree that positive moods are contagious, and negative moods are a downer.

    So, guys, let go of the ridiculous guilt complexes. If you enjoy yourself without hurting someone else, that doesn’t make you a jerk. If you don’t aways do what society tells you to do, that doesn’t make you a bad guy. You can be selfish even 80% of the time and still be a good person. It would take more work to be 100% selfish (“truly dark”).

  • Ted D

    @ Hope – yeah, that is an issue. I was raised to believe being selfish anytime was bad. Truly. I am selfish sometimes, but it comes with guilt attached.

    As far as worrying about “performance”, that may be your take, but when I WORRY about performance it is 10x what I described. That is just my default behavior. And I think maybe I was too vague. The deal is this:

    I pretty much know I’m going to get off, wqhich is the primary goal of sex for a man. So, I have always spent most of my effort working on getting my partner off knowing that I will no matter what. However, in “go for mine” mode I don’t work specifically FOR her pleasure and instead just enjoy and leave her pleasure to her. That is a very new concept for me. I’ve always owned both my and my partners pleasure, because somewhere during my life I decided that was my duty.

  • Ramble

    Sassy, I didn’t follow. Are you saying that when Ted is thinking of others, that that would not be enjoyable…or when he is of the mentality to “go for mine”?

  • Sassy6519

    @ Ramble

    I said that I found it weird that his wife seems to be enjoying the “go for mine” sex. I personally don’t find it appealing. I find mutual pleasure the most alluring thing of all.

    When I have sex with a man, I make it a point that I am giving him pleasure as well as giving myself pleasure. I find that when he is having a good time, then I’m also having a good time. Not to be graphic, but I love seeing a man’s face during sex. I love the reactions, the hurried breathes, the deep moans. That is utter bliss to me. That revs my engines and gets me more turned on.

    It’s all about striking a balance. No woman wants to feel like a masturbatory aid. I want to feel pleasure while also knowing that I am giving him pleasure. One without the other just feels sub par, as far as sex goes for me.

  • Rhen

    Dogsquat: “Watch a romantic comedy.  Who ends up with the girl?”

    It depends on the era when the movie was made. I can’t think of any examples right now, but seems like there are lots of 1930s-era movies in which the heroine is very sassy, even to the point of being bitchy, but is finally happily dominated by the male lead, sometimes by  being turned over his knee and spanked.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Rhen

      I can’t think of any examples right now, but seems like there are lots of 1930s-era movies in which the heroine is very sassy, even to the point of being bitchy, but is finally happily dominated by the male lead, sometimes by being turned over his knee and spanked.

      Oh, those are my favorite! That conflict really ramped up the sexual tension. As feistiness vs. dominance often does ;-)

  • Ted D

    @ Sassy – I think you misunderstood me.  The main difference between my usual “sex mode” and the “go for mine” mode is that I simply do not concentrate on her before me on the latter.  I guess you could say I am uninhibited.  That is a new concept for me as well, that it is OK to completely let go during sex.  In fact, my current SO literally told me early on that I wouldn’t hurt her if I got a little wild.  I must have looked like a deer in headlights, because she followed up immediately with “whats wrong?”.

    Strangely enough, she also told me that I am the only man she has partnered with that seemed to genuinely care about her enjoyment of our sex life.  I told her I couldn’t understand why any man would NOT care about his partner during sex.  That has always been my number one concern.

    When it comes to sex and romantic relationships in general, I am simply not used to “being dominant” in any real capacity.  And as far as “masculine” traits, I’ve spent much more of my life repressing them than celebrating them.  In my marriage, I only started to really push back after years of frustration, and even then I wasn’t pushing back the right way.  I intensified bad, supplicating behavior instead of simply demanding that I get something from the exchange.  In my mind, demanding and/or expecting things is entitlement.  I was totally at a loss when I wasn’t getting the things I needed from my marriage when I was meeting what I believed to be my “part of the deal”.  I went to work, kept the yard nice, maintained the house as best I could, sacrificed my own interests for the family (including walking away from a band I had spent years with that was beginning to look promising. Yeah, I know, silly rock star dreams. :P)  because it took a lot of my time and energy.  I pretty much gave up everything, which I now understand was completely the wrong thing to do.  But I was raised believing it was my role in life, to sacrifice my life and interests for the good of my family.  After all, that was what I saw my grandfather do…

    In fact, one of the comments from my family when I left the music gig was “its about time you grew up and concentrated on your responsibilities”, or something similar.

  • Sassy6519

    Strangely enough, she also told me that I am the only man she has partnered with that seemed to genuinely care about her enjoyment of our sex life.

    THIS STATEMENT RIGHT HERE IS THE REAL ISSUE.

    Your wife told you that you are the only man that has genuinely cared about her enjoyment of sex. Doesn’t that strike you as odd in the least? Who the hell did she engage in sex with in her past to make her think that a man not caring about his partners’ pleasure was normal? Has she honestly never had sex with a man who cared about her pleasure before you? If so, no wonder she wants you to take the “get mine” sexual attitude. It’s all she’s ever known and thinks that kind of sex is normal.

    I 100% agree with the sentiment that women become hardened/disillusioned when they have lots of casual sex or non-meaningful relationships. They start to believe that the very bad behavior their partners exhibit is normal. They never seem to realize that their mate selection criteria or standards are leading them astray.

  • Ted D

    @ Sassy – I actually asked her that question.  It wasn’t that she had lots of casual sex, but frankly hearing about her ex-husband and previous relationships, they mostly seemed to be with men that thought they “knew what they were doing”.  I’ve met her ex-husband, and man to man I think he is pretty cool.  To women he tends to be a jerk.  He has been married three times now, and each relationship (including the one with my current SO) has ended because of cheating.  That being said, he sure is what I consider a manly man.  He hunts, drinks, whores around, and pretty much does what he damn well pleases.  He is very selfish.  But, that was what he saw growing up from his dad.

    I don’t want to get into too much of her history, only because it isn’t my place to spread her dirty laundry about.  I can say that she had a few casual encounters early on, but for the most part has been into serial monogamy.  And, like I did, she stayed in a shitty marriage way longer than she should have, partly for fear of the unknown, and partly for the kids.

    I will say that she doesn’t seem to have had a lot of bad experiences sexually.  She just isn’t used to a man that cares about this as directly as I do.  They all kinda rocked it out and assumed it was good for her I guess…

  • Ted D

    And just to keep it real, she isn’t my wife.  We have been together a few years and are currently living together with my son and her son and daughter.

    I don’t think it matters much, but I didn’t want incorrect info in the discussion. ;)

  • Ted D

    Sorry, but while I’m thinking about it…

    Most of the guys I knew growing up that were successful with the ladies were pretty selfish and mostly didn’t care too much about how the women in their life enjoyed their relationship, whatever it was.  They were in it for themselves.  Otherwise known around these parts as an Alpha.

  • Sassy6519

    @ Ted D

    I respect you for not airing out all your wife’s personal history, but the bits you have told us are very telling.

    It’s pretty common knowledge that women tend to subconsciously seek after men who are similar to men she engaged with early in life. Many women chase after cold, distant, or asshole men because either their first boyfriends were that way or their father was that way. Without coming to terms with things, acknowledging them, and consciously changing the behavior, many women stay stuck in the pattern of getting involved with men who aren’t good men.

    The way your wife engages with you is no different. If she has had relationships with bad men in the past, even so far as to stay in a marriage with one, those interactions shape the way she views relationships. Subconsciously, she must think being mistreated, ignored, or not cared for is how things are in normal relationships. It also influences her turn-ons and sexual preferences. She’s used to sex where the man doesn’t care about her pleasure. It’s all she’s ever known. Of course she would look at your concern for her sexual pleasure as odd. She doesn’t know what normal is in this context. Her views are skewed and biased, based on her previous history with men.

  • Ted D

    @ Sassy – that sounds likely.  But that being said, she seems pretty normal in comparison to her other female friends.  By that I mean, most of them seem to have similar views on this subject.

    Now, that being said, it may also be important to know that she is 8 years my junior in her early 30’s, while I am in my 40’s.  Add to that that I grew up with my grandparents (as I stated earlier).  My grandfather was first generation here, and my grandmother moved over AFTER getting married to my grandfather during WWII.  My mother once told me that her and my aunts used to get spanked for tripping and/or falling.  Why?  Because my grandfather didn’t want them scarring up their legs.  It would look bad later in life when they had to wear skirts at work.  So, to say that my family was old fashioned is an understatement.

    My SO’s background is very different.  Again, without going into too much detail, her mother has been married several times, but never to her biological father.  I know her background is less than stellar, but mine is no picnic either.

    And please understand, we are not talking about abuse here.  She isn’t asking me to whip her.  She is just used to selfish men.  Again, to me, I always kinda assumed that was normal behavior for the “modern man” and I was simply a throwback due to my upbringing.

    I feel like you are getting a picture here of a women that wants/needs/likes being physically abused.  It isn’t like that at all.  She is just very used to having to look out for her own interests, because the men in her life didn’t.

  • Sassy6519

    @ Ted D

    I never said that I think she wants/needs/ likes being physically abused. I am saying, however, that she is used to men who don’t look out for her interests at all, which isn’t good. I am saying that the way she relates to you in this manner isn’t your fault in the least. She has been so accustomed to dealing with men who treat her poorly that she looks at your actions as something that isn’t normal.

    You need to know that not all women are like this. A good portion are, but there are women out there like me who want a man to treat them with respect and who are completely willing to give respect to men in return.

    I have no problem with walking away from a relationship where mutual love and respect aren’t present. I don’t engage in hookups because I respect myself and want what’s best for me. I want to find a good man who will treat me well. I have no time for dallying with assholes. Doing so would just trick my mind into believing that being treated well isn’t normal or that asshole behavior is what I really want (which it isn’t).

    Some women aren’t as self-aware as I am. I know this. Some women haven’t taken the time to be truly introspective. Some women don’t know or aren’t willing to stop doing things that hurt them now or will hurt them in the long run.

    You need to know that how she is reacting to you isn’t normal. You have done nothing wrong. Unfortunately, she was broken before you met her. It isn’t your job to fix her. You can only hope that she works on herself to fix her compulsion to be drawn to asshole behavior.

  • Hope

    @Sassy, it’s good to care about your partner’s pleasure, but TedD said he was seeing it as his responsibility and “duty.” That’s not a good attitude.

    And no offense, but you’re still young. Things can look different after a few years of cohabitation and marriage. There are cycles and times when the woman simply can’t get much enjoyment (two pregnancies and hospital stays for example). I don’t always want to get my pleasure, because I get a lot of enjoyment out of just giving pleasure. Different strokes, different folks.

    There are also lots of women who want, crave and desire more masculinity from their men. This is not the same as jerkiness and assholeishness. Ted was way too far in the direction of being totally nice, and now he’s added more alpha to the mix, which his SO likes. Why insist that she must somehow be broken for liking it?

    You’re perpetuating the myth that taking care of one’s own needs in any way automatically makes a man a jerk. It’s not twisted, wrong, selfish or degrading for a man to find his significant other attractive and to want to do stuff to her that a man likes to do. Also, she may be physiologically wired so that it’s difficult for guys to do much for her outside of some old fashioned jackhammering. Why insist that he tries to do hours of oral or whatever if she doesn’t respond to it?

    You and Ted clearly both have good intentions, but sometimes when we assume we know the best for someone else, we end up wrong and doing things that are utterly useless or worse. What he described doesn’t sound like “asshole behavior” to me, and I bet you if he asked her, she wouldn’t describe it as assholeish either.

    Keeping sexual tension high in a LTR often involves some degree of dominance from the man. Don’t think that “dark game” and “asshole jerk” is the only thing that women respond to, because it’s not. But, if you think even a small hint of selfishness and dominance from a guy means he’s a collosal dark triad asshole, then… we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

  • Sassy6519

    @ Hope

    I never said that anything was wrong with a woman wanting some dominant behavior. There is, however, a very big difference between dominant behavior and “asshole” behavior. I was just letting Ted D know that there are women out there like me who aren’t confused or who can spot the difference between the two.

    Ted D himself said the following at comment #26

    If everything I’ve learned in the last 4 months is true, women in general simply do not respond sexually to being treated well.  They respond sexually to the asshole behavior.

    I don’t think this is true. A real man does care about a woman’s pleasure during sex as well as his own. He strikes a balance between serving others and serving himself during the act. Too much of either extreme causes problems.

    I was also trying to explain to him why perhaps his “wife” reacted the way she did. He admitted that she told him that he is the only man who has ever cared about her enjoyment of sex. I’m sorry, but that just seems rather off to me, as I said before. A woman who has never been with a caring sexual partner is a woman who chose poor sexual partners to begin with. Obviously, her selection criteria isn’t geared towards finding and keeping a man who values mutual enjoyment, otherwise she wouldn’t be complaining now.

    I never said I thought all women were only sexually attracted to asshole behavior. HE SAID THAT. I am merely trying to assure him that it isn’t the case for all women.

    I’m with Saywhaat on this. I am tired of emotionally inept/stunted/coarsened women giving sensible women like me a bad image. No wonder guys are skeptical about long-term relationships/marriages. They treat these women well, only to have them complain later on down the road to try to change them into assholes when it’s not in those particular men’s nature. They are screwing good men up, playing games, and generally conducting themselves like children instead of adults.

    I think the problem is that they want to make their men into alpha assholes because they weren’t able to successfully secure an alpha asshole for long-term commitment themselves. They reluctantly settle down with a beta man, looking at him as a “makeover” project instead of liking him for who he was from the very beginning. The men end up feeling like they are failing the women in their lives because suddenly the women switch and appear dissatisfied later on, when the women were really screwed up from the very beginning.

    It just seems weird to me that despite being together for 4 years now, his “wife” starts acting this way now. That lets me know that she probably settled for him, hoping to change him down the road into the man she truly wanted all along. It’s rather dishonest, in my opinion.

    Question to Ted D. Has your “wife” always exhibited this kind of behavior? Has she always voiced dissatisfaction with you, your sexual lives, or your personality? If so, when did it start? You’d think she would have griped about this sometime before spending 4 freaking years together, only to start complaining about it now.

     

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    Sassy, via Ted proxy

    If everything I’ve learned in the last 4 months is true, women in general simply do not respond sexually to being treated well.  They respond sexually to the asshole behavior.

    Gotta take that from where it comes. A nice guy / beta “treating well” women is different from an alpha “treating well” women. The nice guy TM might consider the alpha is not treating his woman well, because he is not putting her first and up in a pedestal etc.

    A guy engaging in sex with you who is all absort on how you feel it and is worried about his performance, irradiates less fun, persona and authenticity than a guy who is taking care of his own pleasure.

    There is a long curve between taking care of your own pleasure, and not caring about the girls pleasure. Simply put, when you enjoy it, she enjoys it, as long as you´re doing it right.

    The guy who worries about his performance etc doesnt enjoy it as much – he brings nervousness and crap to the act. If he is getting better sex by being an “asshole”, maybe that´s were his real energy and persona are. But I would question what does he mean by asshole anyway, because the word is probably tinted by his previous nice guy frame.

  • Sassy6519

    I really want to clarify the difference between dominant/masculine behavior and asshole/jerk behavior. Here are my thoughts.

    Asshole/jerk behavior comes from a place of weakness while dominant/masculine behavior comes from a place of strength, in my opinion.

    I define masculine/dominant behavior as brave, noble, competent, ambitious, emotionally secure, assertive, and controlled. I define asshole/jerk behavior as reckless, crass, selfish, emotionally inept, conniving, dishonest, and cruel.

    The same can be said for feminine behavior and bitchy behavior.

    I define feminine behavior as pleasant, supportive, demure, sensual, controlled, and emotionally secure. I define bitchy behavior as reckless, catty, cruel, emotionally inept, critical, and crass.

    I definitely believe that asshole/bitchy behavior comes from a place of weakness in a person while masculine/feminine behavior comes from a place of strength. I also think that anyone who exhibits asshole/bitchy behavior, as far as how I define them, should be avoided at all cost. Those people, in my opinion, stoop to using such behavior because they are aren’t truly confident or because they are weak (not two things I want to associate with).

  • Michael of Charlotte

    RE: Besu #173 and Heidi #176

    It’s also enlightening to me that you both didn’t know that.  I just assumed it was a given.

     

  • Dogsquat

    Ramble asked:

    “…how likely do you think that future schools, regardless of current cultural changes, will NOT lean, at least slightly, toward the female imperative?  “

    I think it’ll be that way as long as this country lasts.  An even simpler metric (other than funding, etc.) is:

    What percentage of teachers are female?

    There’s your answer.

  • Dogsquat

    Heidi said:

    “Third, any form of violence towards another student is just that… VIOLENCE.  It’s not tolerated regardless of gender. “

    If I was running a school, I’d only suspend the aggressor.  Sometimes a bully needs his ass kicked.

    I went to a shitty, ghetto school in Pittsburgh before, and the teachers thought like you do.  Since I was the only white kid, I got picked on a bit.  They’d hit me and if I reported it to a teacher, they’d get in trouble.  Then they’d come back even madder at me.

    When I fought back and won a few times (lost more – hard to beat up three kids at once if you have no formal training), the bullying stopped.

    See how that works?

    “Secondly, an 8th grader threatening you with her mental institution boyfriend? She had something going on.  I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt in assuming you’re telling the story as unbiased as you can, but even with a slight bias, this chick was mental.”

    I was as neutral about the story as possible.  It really did happen as I said it.  Also, I seriously doubt Julie had a boyfriend, mental institution or not.  I think she was angry at me for the rejection, and was trying to scare me.  I gather that she did have troubles at home, since she was seeing the school counselor on the regular.  The school counselor told me I should have taken her “troubles at home” into account before she recommended I be suspended.

    To this day I don’t know what she meant – would a guy do that prior to getting kicked in the nuts, or post?

    Good thing I had both of my nuts replaced with big, brass balls.

  • Dogsquat

    Hope said:

    “So, guys, let go of the ridiculous guilt complexes. If you enjoy yourself without hurting someone else, that doesn’t make you a jerk. “

    My girlfriend said give me ten inches and make it hurt!

    So I fucked her twice and punched her in the face.

    Ba-Doom Tish!

  • Dogsquat

    Ted D said:
    “I’ve always owned both my and my partners pleasure, because somewhere during my life I decided that was my duty. “

    Somewhere along the line, I picked up the same thing.  I have no idea where, but I got this idea that most men were terrible and selfish in bed, and I didn’t want to be like that.

    I’ve had some shitty luck in some aspects of life, but I’ve always been lucky with girls and jobs.  Fortunately, I met a very nice young lady who educated me fairly early on about that.  Blessings be upon her, wherever she is now.

  • Dogsquat

    @Rhen –

    That’s a great point about the era of the movie.  I hadn’t considered it, and from my limited experience (I’m a book guy, not a movie guy) you are absolutely correct.

  • Heidi

    Ted D said:
    “I’ve always owned both my and my partners pleasure, because somewhere during my life I decided that was my duty.”

    Most every partner I’ve had has been concerned with whether or not I’ve come. At first I thought that was sweet, but then felt pressured to orgasm, which makes it all that much harder.  ESPECIALLY since it takes 15 minutes or so of clit stimulation and not just penetration. (Gah… just realized that’s a bit graphic… Susan, please let me know if I’ve crossed the line.) So I’d be left with one position… lie that I reached the big “o” or feel this insane pressure to come for HIS satisfaction and manhood.

    This facade didn’t last long.

    It finally dawned on me to start telling my partners, “You know you’re not responsible for my orgasm, right?”  They didn’t believe me or would laugh it off.  My response has always been, “I’ve been masturbating for the better part of 20 years. I know how to get off quickly. I’ll show you how to do it, or I can do it myself.”  I’m super blunt about it, which I think is appreciated. There’s still lots of exploring and fun adventures, but I make it clear that *I* own my orgasm.  If I don’t have one, it’s no fault of his own.  Oh, and that I still enjoy sex even though I don’t come.  (I know, hard to believe!)  So we each own our orgasm.

    I love how freeing this has been.  My partners feel less pressure, which means we’re both free to explore new adventures without the pressure of making the other one come.  I’ve just never understood why men feel they must own the other person’s orgasm, when we encourage women to own their own sexuality.  He’s not going to know my body like I do, you know?

    Hopefully this makes sense… I’ve been multi-tasking while I write.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Heidi et al

      (Gah… just realized that’s a bit graphic… Susan, please let me know if I’ve crossed the line.)

      Psshh, nothing is really too graphic for me. I’m sitting on a post about handjobs that I haven’t been able to bring myself to put up. I think it was Ted that inspired it, actually.

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    Heidi,

    Yes that makes total sense. I´ve come to the point I express that too:

    “Hey, you´re responsible for your own orgasm”

  • Aaron1988

    I have a question (I hope you don’t mind).

    How can a guy be more assertive (what’s the difference between assertive and asshole) and still be a nice guy that women will like. What advice would you give a guy who’s not just taken the blue pill approach but OD’ed on the blue pill lol. I don’t want to be an asshole just not a doormat anymore, if that makes sense, because I am either “too nice” (my ex’s familys’ words!) or in my opinion an asshole (to the point that I just don’t care what she says/thinks anymore – I know that sounds nasty but I just get to the point of screw this I’m doing what I want to do today (although I don’t say that I don’t put up with anything and I cause lots of arguments).

    I don’t want to compromise my principles though ie no more sex till marriage, no porn/stripclubs etc, no cheating, polite with good manners and I don’t kiss someone until I’m dating them – this isn’t nice guy stuff its I hatebeing physically intimate with someone I don’t love stuff and what feels right for me.

    I read on here someone said join the gym. Why? What about cross country running, weights at home, push ups, sit ups instead because this is how I have always done it when I used to play rugby (american football without any pads, helmets etc just a mouth guard) and it shouldn’t be too hard to get back into shape this way as its what I’m used to doing (a few years ago lol).

    Thankyou for taking the time to read this and sorry if it was a bit rambley.
    -Aaron

  • Ted D

    @ Sassy – I think you confused me with someone else here. My current SO is not complaining at all.  In fact, she is very forthcoming in words and actions letting me know how much she appreciates me.  That being said, she is also acting as my female education instructor as I digest my new red pill knowledge.  I have not been  putting that knowledge to work to save a fading relationship.  I’m using it to take a great relationship to the moon!

    I very much greatly appreciate your concern for my situation. If I gave you the idea that she was unhappy, then it was my shortcoming in trying to spell out a very complex process in my head using written word on a blog.

    In regards to asshole behavior, Yohami has it right for my point of view.  As a newly reformed Nice Guy(TM), I still tend to view just about any game activity as asshole behavior.  Again, keep in mind I was raised feeling selfishness was bad in any amount.  So, modifying my behavior to get what I want really does feel like an asshole thing to do.  Heidi or Hope I think called it.  What I feel is asshole behavior they see as normal male behavior.  If it is considered “masculine” and deals with women, I probably would say it is assholean on the knee-jerk reaction.  I’m working on changing it, but it still feels rather creepy to me.

  • JM

    If I was running a school, I’d only suspend the aggressor.

    Co-signed. I was in middle school about a decade ago, and there was the usual “zero tolerance” policy towards violence. Which in reality meant “we’re going to punish everybody involved equally regardless of the circumstances.” It was clear that the adults who were responsible for us (who, I might mention, were mostly female, make of that what you may) were not interested in justice, but in putting up a show of opposing violence while not actually putting effort into anything of the sort. If you were attacked or got your stuff stolen at school–tough luck getting any help. You really only had two choices. One, submit to your attacker. That’s a shitty way to live, under another person’s virtually unrestrained dominance, though I suppose if you for whatever reason wanted to please the adults above your own well-being that’s what you would do. Two, fight back. Since you were going to get punished for defending yourself anyways, it was prudent to go for broke. (So much for preventing violence.) Yeah, you would probably get suspended, but if you could intimidate your attackers enough they would stop fucking with you. I can’t say I personally was attacked or got into fights a lot, or that I was the biggest or strongest. In fact, I was a somewhat skinny nerd. But I was fast, and more importantly, when it came to fighting I was just fucking crazier than the (few) people I fought.

    Still, even back then I was taught never to hit a female (not that I was ever physically attacked by a female), and eventually I learned to curb my violence in general. It was part of becoming an adult, or so I was told. After (at least nominally) arriving in the world of adults, though, it seems that the way adults use authority towards each other is often no better than the way they used it towards children, and that violent dominance games aren’t only played by males, children, or individuals. Nowadays I find myself wondering if I need to be ready to take up the sword again. The potential consequences would certainly be more severe this time–at least there is only so much damage a child can likely do to another physically.

  • Emily

    @GudEnuf

    I actually don’t think that #1 would bother me.  I feel like it’s normal for people to make many random intellectual and emotional connections throughout their lives.  The idea of banning my partner from having meaningful conversations with other people seems EXTREMELY greedy and possessive.  As long as the conversation/connection was completely platonic, then I’m fine with it.  If he learned something meaningful about himself or the world, then it could even be a good thing.  If they’d exchanged contact info then I might be concerned though, but more because I’d be worried about it leading to scenario #2.

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    Aaron1988,

    Short answer, WTF?

  • Ramble

    I think it’ll be that way as long as this country lasts.

    If it makes you feel any better, as far as I can tell, almost all western countries are in the same boat. Yeah, I know, cold comfort.

    An even simpler metric (other than funding, etc.) is:

    What percentage of teachers are female?

    There’s your answer.

    That is why I mentioned all of those parameters in the initial question. So many government jobs, especially teaching, are particularly more attractive to women than men.

    It was sorta my way of saying that piecemeal fixes won’t do all that much.

  • Jesus Mahoney

    Aaron,

    That really WAS a pretty fucking confusing post. But from what I can tell, you’re looking to break out of the whole binary “doormat vs. douche bag” frame.

    The thing you have to realize is that though the nice guy and the ass hole seem worlds apart, they both, at heart, “pedestalize” women. They’ve just adopted different strategies for getting female approval. And while it’s true that douche bags fare better than doormats in the SMP, being a douche bag is hardly a great strategy for long term fulfillment and happiness.

    The way out is to learn how to be a real man. Yohami likes to recommend Dr. Paul’s Mind OS. I think that’s a great book, too. In addition, I would also check out David Deida’s The Way of the Superior Man and Robert Glover’s No More Mr. Nice Guy. All easy reads, and all will help you develop into a stronger, more mature man if you apply the ideas in them.

    The doormat thinks that worshiping a woman is going to win her love. This is so fucking wrong that it would be laughable if it a. weren’t such a common outlook, and b. didn’t lead so many men to abject heartbreak.

    The douche bag thinks that manipulating and denigrating a woman is going to win her affections. It works, sometimes. But, of course, the women you attract are basket cases. And, truth be told, you’re a basket case, too, since being a shit makes you feel like shit in the end.

    The real man knows that the way to attract quality women is to develop his own personal value. When you develop and grow your own value, you become more confident, more successful, and more selective. And you don’t hand your balls over to the first pretty girl that gives you the time of day, because, since you value yourself so highly, you want to screen her more thoroughly and make sure she’s worthy of your commitment to her.

  • Aaron1988

    Sorry if it was confusing its 2:15am here so I’m probably not making much sense.

    Yes you got that pretty much correct I basically want to be more assertive and not just put up with the crap I normally do because I’m trying to be a “good boyfriend” (read:doormat!) I am prettymuch as ted d was ie I try to make my gf happy and I make sacrifices to do this as I always put her first and I don’t want to be treated like shit anymore I want an equal relationship not a dictatorship (her or me).

    Are there any websites/blogs you would recommend?

    I hope that makes sense,
    Aaron

  • Jesus Mahoney

    Are there any websites/blogs you would recommend?

    This one. Stick around. Dogsquat and Mike C have some pretty solid relationship advice, and Yohami and Badger know a lot about real game. Both Yohami and Badger have blogs with some great advice on it too.

    Some advice I can give about relationships:

    1. Always be willing to walk away. Your woman is not the most important thing in your life. If she is…. then get a life. Have a purpose, and while you should allow your woman in your life, you shouldn’t let her distract you from your purpose.

    2. Define your terms for your relationship. This isn’t being an asshole. Everyone has terms that are non-negotiable. Articulate for yourself what yours are. You shouldn’t sit your woman down and “tell” her your terms. It wouldn’t help anyway. If you tell her your terms, she’s still going to challenge them. That’s what women do. They’re called shit tests, or fitness tests. Just know for yourself what you’re willing to negotiate and what you’re not.

    3. Learn to express yourself without having to explain yourself. There’s no need to justify why you think or feel what you do. It’s you. If she accepts you, then she accepts your feelings. Otherwise, she’s not worth it.

    4. Her shit is not your shit. You don’t need to fix all her issues. She’s a woman. She’s always going to have issues. Respect her, listen to her, but don’t feel like you have to “save” her. Let her feel what she feels without getting all enmeshed in her feelings. If she had a lousy day, you don’t need to be in a bad mood as a result.

    If I think of anything else, I’ll continue. The above is pretty solid advice though, I think.

  • Aaron1988

    Thankyou for the advice just another quick question.

    I realise this is probably(?) a shit test but when she is trying to pick a fight ie name calling, compleately disagreeing with everything you say all day, saying things like “you need to do…”, never helps with the housework and then moans the house is messy (yeah I know it is and it your house too so you can do stuff around the house too! Is my normal reply for this but that still ends in an argument). What is the best way to react.

    I know that pretty much all day every day is a shit test with her (her familys’ nick name for her is princess k…..) so I really need the advice.

    Thankyou once again for your advice.
    -Aaron

  • Jesus Mahoney

    I guess the real question, Aaron, is why you would want to be with someone like that in the first place.

  • http://www.yohami.com/blog/ YOHAMI

    Aaron,

    I realise this is probably(?) a shit test but when she is trying to pick a fight ie name calling, compleately disagreeing with everything you say all day, saying things like “you need to do…”, never helps with the housework and then moans the house is messy (yeah I know it is and it your house too so you can do stuff around the house too! Is my normal reply for this but that still ends in an argument). What is the best way to react.

    Thats not a shit test, thats a shitty person. Press NEXT and be happier.

     

  • Aaron1988

    She wasn’t like it when I first met. I haven’t really had alot of dating experience as I have only dated 2 women (first 18 months second 3 1/2 years) we aren’t actually together, just living together until I move out (as soon as my new place is ready) so it will give me an oppotunity to learn to be more assertive and unlearn my doormat tendencies or at least learn a bit in the short amount of time I have to put up with her for (I know that sounds bad).

    -Aaron

  • http://badgerhut.wordpress.com Badger

    Heidi,

    “I LOVE LOVE LOVE role playing with my boyfriend.  (Hint: my real name isn’t Heidi, but it IS the name of the hot red-head who often inhabits my bed during Fantasy Girlfriend weekend.)”

    Sounds hot. I would be curious to know how you score on the test I posted on my blog.

    “Define “rough.”  I’d also like Dark Side to define his “asshole-ish” behavior.  A lot of what you all are mention isn’t asshole behavior.  It’s simply YOU standing up for yourselves (I call it respect, but call it what you want).

    Stop saying you’re behaving like assholes.  You’re not, (this is directed to all of you), unless you’re lying, cheating, demeaning, or demoralizing your girlfriends/wives.  And the behavior you’ve mentioned is NONE OF THAT.”

    Rough means rough. Not talking about sex. Rough is:
    -Not answering text messages for hours
    -Not returning voicemails, or calling back without listening to the voice mail and making her repeat it
    -Insisting on the food or movie for that night, and when she protests and suggests something else telling her we’re not doing that.
    -Cancelling of dates on short notice without explaining the reason.
    -Openly flirting with other women
    -Refusing to talk about where you’ve been
    -Anything here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_suppression_techniques

    I consider this stuff real asshole behavior – very inconsiderate if done intentionally, if it’s a part of a guy’s nature he’s just not very considerate per se. I’ve never done all these things as part of a plan – usually it’s been accidental, I’ve been busy, etc. I’ve done some of them, in isolated contexts (I haven’t done the flirting, public ridicule or hiding my whereabouts). The results are fairly clear – a much more compliant and aroused response than the conscientious nice guy – clear enough to make it strategically advantageous. Trouble is I’m naturally the latter so it takes some work to choke off that behavior from myself. In a manner of speaking, women are aroused by men positively not caring about them. Like Dark Side says, it’s tremendously saddening to find this out.

    It’s interesting and curious that there are women like Heidi and Ozy who seem to really dig the swell beta guy motif, but we guys have learned that they are rare, and we have to position ourselves where there are buyers, which means a bit more of a rough edge. In particular, in keeping with the last post, we’ve learned to keep our desire for a relationship under wraps so we don’t get typed as creepy.

    Roissy wrote about behaviors like these in a post called “Dread.” Susan lampooned it as “how to destroy a relationship.” She’s right, but so is Roissy – women respond to it.

     

  • http://badgerhut.wordpress.com Badger

    There’s another thing about “go for mine” that needs to be mentioned. I didn’t grow up in a feminist household or school, but from a young age I was made aware of the alleged shortcomings of bad lovers – not caring about her pleasure, not enough foreplay, being fussy about wearing condoms, rolling over and sleeping as soon as he’d finished, etc. So of course I was inculcated into a nice-guy mindset that I wasn’t going to be selfish like those guys was I?!?

    But like in most other arenas with women, trying to please gets a man nowhere. The frame that works is “join me, I’m going to enjoy this and you’ll be pleased as a collateral benefit.”

    Now, with the knowledge I have, I view it as another combination of nice-guy fitness test and women saying one thing and responding to another (hamstersheeling).

     

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    @Ramble

    So many government jobs, especially teaching, are particularly more attractive to women than men.

    I’ve taught only in private schools, so if you asked me what the appeal of the teaching profession is to a woman, based on what I’ve seen, I’d say:

    a) It appeals to her nurturing side

    (I taught in my own alma mater, and just as I was encouraged, as a student, to think of my teacher as my “second mother,” I soon picked up the faculty quirk of referring to the students in my homeroom class as “my children.” Note: It was an all-girls school with a policy of hiring male teachers only for high school, and even then, not as homeroom teachers, which is why I never had a “second father.”)

    b) It’s one of the last fields in which a woman can be totally upfront in the job interview about wanting to do it only until she gets married, and still get hired.

    (Can you guess how many jobs I probably didn’t get hired for–that I bet I would have done really well at–because when I was asked how long I saw myself staying with the company, I gave an honest answer? It’s kind of like bringing up special needs adoption on the second date, wouldn’t you say? Hahahaha!)

  • Ted D

    @ JM – Holy shit!  I never thought about it, but you are 100% correct.  The PUA guys all claim that Nice Guys(TM) put women on a pedestal, but the fact that they spend so much time and effort to GET female attraction shows that they do as well!

    That is truly ironic.  I’m sure this isn’t a new concept to most, but I really never gave it a thought.  I always felt like I was missing some piece of the puzzle.  Like something just didn’t sit right with me when reading Rossy, Roosh, etc.  But I think that was it!

    Nice Guys(TM) – put women on a pedestal for relationships

    PUAs – put women on a pedestal for sex

    So the best thing to be is, neither!  My goal is to not put anyone on a pedestal.  That is the quick way to giving someone else all the power, and even the nicest, most honest person has difficulty not abusing power.  Instead I’m shooting for balance, as in neither I nor my SO has ALL the power.  It may vary a bit from day to day, but in the end balance is key.

    Kinda like mutually assured destruction. :p

  • http://bbsezmore.wordpress.com/ Bb

    “My goal is to not put anyone on a pedestal.  That is the quick way to giving someone else all the power, and even the nicest, most honest person has difficulty not abusing power.  Instead I’m shooting for balance, as in neither I nor my SO has ALL the power.  It may vary a bit from day to day, but in the end balance is key.

    Kinda like mutually assured destruction. :p”

    @Ted D…Or a mutual, respectful partnership. That’s absolutely what I wanted, and what I got. For me, that’s the best way.

    ” Nice Guys(TM) – put women on a pedestal for relationships
    PUAs – put women on a pedestal for sex”

    Intriguing. And from what I hear, both these behaviors tend to garner bitchy women.

  • Sassy6519

    “ Nice Guys(TM) – put women on a pedestal for relationships
    PUAs – put women on a pedestal for sex”

    Intriguing. And from what I hear, both these behaviors tend to garner bitchy women.

    This + 1,000

    At some point, men have got to wonder exactly what type of women they are getting involved with by acting this way.

    If you act like a doormat with no self-respect, you will attract women who aren’t stable themsleves.

    If you act like a complete PUA or domineering asshole, you will attract women who also aren’t stable.

     

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      At some point, men have got to wonder exactly what type of women they are getting involved with by acting this way.

      If you act like a doormat with no self-respect, you will attract women who aren’t stable themsleves.

      If you act like a complete PUA or domineering asshole, you will attract women who also aren’t stable.

      This question comes up again and again. I say not all women are slutty, and the player says yes they are. I say not all women want to have sex with an asshole, just women with low self-esteem. The guys say, “no no, I bang religious girls all the time.” Round and round we go.

      Susceptibility to Game tactics varies by tactic and by woman. A certain level of dominance is likely to be very attractive to nearly all women, but there is a boomerang affect as you continue to increase it. Men with true alpha type characteristics do not attract all women, but strongly attract certain types of women.

      Frost and Krauser PUA wrote about this recently – I think I may post on it. They both opine that chicks in bars who are easy to hit on are different (and lower quality) than other women.

  • http://bbsezmore.wordpress.com/ Bb

    “If you act like a doormat with no self-respect, you will attract women who aren’t stable themselves.”

    @Sassy I do think there needs to be a distinction here. Some men aren’t “acting like doormats with no self-respect” on purpose—I daresay none of them want to. It’s just that some men thought this is how they were supposed to act.

    The dynamic I”m talking about is this: Nice Guy ends up with a bitchy woman because she has someone she can control and manipulate. He simply thinks he has a normal girlfriend. All girls are bitchy. Just be nice and put up with it.

    Then he discovers Game. And guess what? Now he can control a bitchy woman with Game, and she’s not acting bitchy! But has she really changed? Is she changing, maturing, and learning from her mistakes? Is the guy learning from his? If so, then both are growing into a more honest relationship. And maybe they can both talk about what they want and need.

    But If the amount of Game needed in the relationship doesn’t change, then I suspect he’s just found a means of controlling her inner bitch. Nothing’s changed, except for his strategy on how to deal with her.

    “The guys say, “no no, I bang religious girls all the time.” Round and round we go.”

    Goodness, religious girls can have low self-esteem. Any girl can, for that matter.

  • Heidi

    @Badger

    “It’s interesting and curious that there are women like Heidi and Ozy who seem to really dig the swell beta guy motif, but we guys have learned that they are rare, and we have to position ourselves where there are buyers, which means a bit more of a rough edge. In particular, in keeping with the last post, we’ve learned to keep our desire for a relationship under wraps so we don’t get typed as creepy.”

    It dawned on me last night… you know why I’ve never “wanted” for a date and why I’ve never felt there to be a shortage of men wanting to date me?  Because those guys who claim they are “invisible” are all in my line of sight.

    Yes, they may not be the “hottest” individuals in that they aren’t classically handsome, but their quirky behavior, geeky tendencies, and massive brain power increase their attractiveness EXPONENTIALLY for me.  I might rate a guy a 6 (if I “rated,” but honestly, I don’t), but when he starts talking with me and I find him charming, witty, and slightly goofy (awkward or nervous), he starts stepping up the ladder pretty quickly.

    So while the other women are vying for the 3 “classically” hot guys in the room, I’m looking at the other 97 thinking, “Wow, so many options!”  I didn’t realize I behaved like this until we started reading and interacting with everyone here… But all this talk of the “invisible” datable men made me realize that no one has ever really been invisible to me.

    I think this stems from the incident I mentioned that happened when I was 13. I felt like SUCH bitch and can DISTINCTLY remember thinking, “How would I feel if that had happened to ME?”  (refresher:  I turned down a not-so-good-looking guy who had the guts to ask me to dance). Ever since then, I remind myself of that moment… and have always treated others the way I want to be treated.  Do I find it flattering when a man expresses interest in me?  Yes.  Therefore, most men will find it flattering, too.  Even if they shoot me down, they’re still flattered.  Same with compliments.  I like receiving compliments (half the fun is remembering to accept them gracefully!), thus, others probably like that, too.  :)

    So simple (like a lot of this info), yet so not common.

    As for the “asshole” behavior: (from Badger in comment 250)…
    -Not answering text messages for hours

    This would just tell me the guy isn’t interested.  If it’s a LTR and he doesn’t answer the texts right away, that’s okay.  Texting is like a long conversation with random breaks.  If it’s because I’m texting too much, long delays would cause me to not text as frequently, and not answering right away would be a good way to sort of remind the sender that you can’t spend all day texting.  I never say, “Hey, why aren’t you answering my texts?” or *expect* replies in a certain timeframe.  People have lives. I respect this.

    -Not returning voicemails, or calling back without listening to the voice mail and making her repeat it

    I’m not sure I understand why this is “asshole-ish.” I call back people all the time (generally close friends or family) without listening to the voicemail.  I usually joke when the answer and say, “Hey, I saw I missed your call… what’s up?”  Among close friends and family, we’ve discussed this.  My mom prefers I listen to the VM before I call her back.  My  best friend and I know we won’t listen to each other’s VM, so we don’t leave them.

    I suppose this means I’m being rude when I don’t listen to VM but call someone back anyway?  Whoops!

    -Insisting on the food or movie for that night, and when she protests and suggests something else telling her we’re not doing that.

    This seems asshole-ish only if you pick something you KNOW she’s not into.  But if she says, “Oh, normally Indian food is my favorite, but I forgot to tell you I had it for lunch.  Would you mind if we try that new Mexican place instead?” and you say, “No, we’re having Indian food,” then you’re being an asshole.  That’s more controlling than assertive.  If she’s just like whine-whine-whine-“I don’t want that, but I don’t know what I want”-whine-whine-whine, then saying something like, “You have 5 minutes to figure out a place or we’re getting Indian,” is not asshole-ish.  Of course, this is just my opinion, lol.

    -Cancelling of dates on short notice without explaining the reason.

    This is just rude. Do women you *don’t date* respond well to this?  Like a co-worker or friend’s wife or something? In general, if someone sets their time aside for me, I do them the courtesy of calling as far in advance as possible to cancel, and generally with good reason (which I explain).  Canceling on *anyone* (for no reason) is just a dick move and disrespects their time or plans.

    Things come up at the last minute.  I understand that.  But you should at least call and provide an explanation, even if it is that you’d prefer to go out with your buddies for beers.  Which, btw, is not a dick move, IMO.  If something comes up and you handle it gracefully, it’s OKAY TO CANCEL.

    Weak:
    “A friend came into town.  Can I go out for drinks with him tonight?”  Don’t ask permission.  Do what you have to do, apologize for inconveniencing someone, and offer a make-up.

    Not dickish:
    “I was really looking forward to hanging out with you tonight, but I’ve just had a friend come into town. I’d love to make up for canceling on you by taking you out to see this new indie film next Wednesday.”

    Dickish:
    “I’m busy tonight and won’t be able to go out like we planned.  I’ll talk to you later. *click*”

    -Openly flirting with other women

    If you’re IGNORING your date/girlfriend/LTR to flirt, then you’re being a dick.  If it’s so obvious that it makes your date/girlfriend/LTR uncomfortable and/or she asks you to stop, then you’re being a dick.  If you turn on the charm for other women, but then not your date/girlfriend/LTR, then you’re being a dick.  If you exchange numbers with (or ask for the number of) another woman in front of your date/LTR/GF, YOU’RE BEING A DICK.  All things in moderation, including flirting.

    -Refusing to talk about where you’ve been

    Are we talking dates or LTRs?  Dates, it’s not really their business.  LTRs, if she’s asking out of curiousity (“so what was the highlight of your day yesterday?”), then don’t be a douche by evading the question.

    If she’s an LTR and asking in an accusatory tone, you’ve got more problems than just making small talk.  Your woman doesn’t trust you, and if you’ve given her no reason to doubt your trust, then she’s making shite up.  That’s high drama.  Leave the situation.

    Again, these are all my opinions, of course, but there’s a fine line between being assertive, being an asshole, and being controlling.  All things in moderation.

     

     

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Heidi
      I find your standards honorable and rational. And I’m adding you to the column of women here who genuinely like beta guys. No matter how many of us show up, the guys still say we’re outliers. If we are, we are in a significant minority. That doesn’t mean we want doormat men, but it may mean we are indeed turned on by massive brain power and a quirky outlook. That’s certainly been true for me, and I learned that by dating a dumb jock the first time around.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Every woman SAYS that she wants a kind, responsible, respectable man and would never date a jerk. She will even say that breathlessly with her skirt around her knees while she is bending over the banged up motorcycle of a wanted felon. And she will BELIEVE it too! She truly won’t see the contradiction between what she says and what she does.

    But I believe that there is a significant population of “invisible” women. They prefer the men who are also invisible. These women quickly get into committed relationships and are truly not seen in the marketplace. Men who are looking for love hardly ever see these women because they are literally at home with their husbands or boyfriends. These women politely decline the invitations of “visible” men, which doesn’t make them any more distinguishable to those men, whose invitations are declined all the time because that is part of the numbers game they must play.

    I believe Susan Walsh is one of these women. Heidi too.

    On the other hand, there might be one subtle difference between what visible women and invisible women say. This is what makes me think Heidi is the real deal: Most women in the marketplace say that they CAN’T FIND a kind, responsible, respectable man. That’s because such men are invisible to most women in the marketplace. The invisible woman sees these men and knows that they are actually (still) the majority.

    This might lead one to believe that invisible men are in luck, but not so. Invisible men surely outnumber invisible women by at least 10 to 1.

  • SayWhaat

    Dark Side,

    I don’t have a problem finding these men. I have a problem in getting them to stick around.

  • Sassy6519

    I don’t have a problem finding these men. I have a problem in getting them to stick around.

    Ditto.

    I also have a habit of finding men who were truly nice to me in the beginning, only for them to turn into nut jobs or jerks later. They become Mr. Hyde instead of remaining Dr. Jekyll, which I find highly disappointing.

     

  • http://bbsezmore.wordpress.com/ Bb

    “Every woman SAYS that she wants a kind, responsible, respectable man and would never date a jerk.”

    Not every woman. Some or many, but not all.

  • Esau

    Bb:

    “Every woman SAYS that she wants a kind, responsible, respectable man and would never date a jerk.”

    Not every woman. Some or many, but not all.

    Bb, it’s not clear exactly what you’re contradicting in your “Not”.  Looking just at the quoted sentence, do the “not every” women you refer to not want a kind, responsible, respectable man?  would they ever (ie not-never) date a jerk?  If you’re going to contradict or contravene someone, it will have more effect if you can say exactly what it is that you’re disputing.

    Bonus recommendation: the use of “some” strongly indicates, IME, that the writer really isn’t making much of a statement; technically “some” means anything between one person and everyone, which is such a huge range as to be almost meaningless for most purposes (except when truly none, as in absolutely zero, is the alternative).  Good habit: any time you find yourself using “some”, see if you think you have the evidence to rephrase the same statement using either “a majority” or “a minority”; if you can’t say either of those, then how much do you really know?  (Yes, “many” is a slight improvement over “some”, but I’m sure you can do better.)

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Bb is right. Some women admit that they prefer “Dark Triad” types. They are very rare. Even the women who write love letters to serial killers in prison say things like, “he has a really good heart” and “he is just misunderstood”. Very few, if any, say “I am attracted to him because he is a serial killer’ — even though that is all they know about him.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    SayWhaat and Sassy6519:

    When men leave you, do they typically leave to be alone, or do they leave you to be with other women?

    If it is the former, you might want to ask yourself what made them think they were better off alone. If it is the latter, then they were probably not the “invisible” men I am talking about. Unfortunately, these men have very few options and will stick like superglue to any woman who continues to give him half as much kindness and sex as he deserves. I know this because I used to be a shy guy, and I used to have a good heart.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    PS> Or maybe I am just as delusional as everyone else. I probably don’t know squat about anything.

  • Dogsquat

    Dark Side said:

    “I probably don’t know squat about anything.”

     

     

    Tell ‘em you know Dogsquat!

    YYYEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!

  • Desiderius

    Susan,

    “And I’m adding you to the column of women here who genuinely like beta guys.”

    Has Connor dialed you back yet?

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Desiderius

      Has Connor dialed you back yet?

      Yes, I did hear back from her, as a matter of fact. I hesitate to report, because I think you’ll be to hard on her. She continued to get one text a month or so from Adam, hinting at getting together but never suggesting a plan. One time he mentioned that he had moved into a new apartment and could really use a woman’s perspective. She saw her chance, and offered a design consult if he would buy her a drink. He said, “Definitely!” She offered a couple of nights, and he said he was away then but would be in touch. A couple of weeks later he texted while she was out with friends, at around 11. He then came out to that bar to meet up with her. She said it was a disaster on several fronts:

      1. She had proposed a one-on-one meeting and he punted for a bar meetup.
      2. She was there with friends whom he didn’t know. He dragged along a friend who was obviously not thrilled to be there. It felt somewhat awkward.
      3. Three women hit on him during their conversation. He nervously giggled while these women threw themselves at him. (One actually said about his piercing blue eyes: “You have ugly eyes, you should see a doctor about it.” That has got to be the worst pickup line I’ve ever heard.) Connor said that either of two responses would have been better: Either his saying, “Excuse me, I’m having a conversation with my friend here.” Or even some light flirting. Instead he just took it in for as long as they tried.

      She said that it is very obviously futile, and I agree. She asked him out, he didn’t take the bait. He put himself into a DLV situation by showing up late with a reluctant friend and making awkward chit chat. Finally, he mishandled what could have been mad social proof, and wound up offending the woman he was interested in.

      In short, he overcame considerable physical and character advantages to ensure failure by being a total pussy.

  • Esau

    JM at 243:  The thing you have to realize is that though the nice guy and the ass hole seem worlds apart, they both, at heart, “pedestalize” women. They’ve just adopted different strategies for getting female approval.

    Ted D October at 253:  @ JM – Holy shit!  I never thought about it, but you are 100% correct.  The PUA guys all claim that Nice Guys(TM) put women on a pedestal, but the fact that they spend so much time and effort to GET female attraction shows that they do as well!

    Yes, this is a deep vein of irony, and under-discussed, that PUA’s are just as much slaves to women’s desires as are the beta chumps they profess to despise.  In fact, it’s funny to picture an unlikely troika of feminists, PUA’s and Nice Guys:  each group mutually despises both the others, but the one thing they all agree on is that women’s desires are centrally important and that it’s men’s job to adapt to them.

  • Desiderius

    Susan,

    “Yes, I did hear back from her, as a matter of fact.”

    Awesome! I was completely wrong again*, and about something where the truth is more encouraging than what I thought. This lends credence to Tasmin’s view:

    “The continued projection of the minority and the tactics employed by them onto the majority, without the balance provided by open and honest discourse in underlying motivations is part of why we have more women feeling the need to hook-up and more men employing game to try to be the recipient of said hook-up.”

    The flip side is the need for open and honest discourse. Maybe the “too hard” comes from this medium, so I’ll try to be more diplomatic.

    She says: One time he mentioned that he had moved into a new apartment and could really use a woman’s perspective. (pretty smooth invite, but subtlety is unfortunately currently a DLV – given the social proof that he’s already established, his insistence on more traditional forms should be seen as an indicator of LTR interest, not  inexperience with women)

    You say: She had proposed a one-on-one meeting (say whaat? he proposed it, she accepted it, sort of, but only with the ever present shit tests attached)

    She says: She saw her chance, and offered a design consult if he would buy her a drink.

    Buying drinks for women pre-sex is a huge no-no. It is a shit test for filtering out doormats. Especially buying drinks for women who ask for them. That is why he went back to square one (pre-date).

    Now with what I know of the background, if I were Adam, I’d come back with cocky-funny (ok, if you insist – Mountain Dew or Root Beer?), but at his age, this would be a huge red flag for him.

    She’s Lucy with the football – he always has to commit first, and most women he knows will blow him out if he does so. The “definitely!” tells me I could be completely out in left field here, but again actions speak louder, and what he did was go back to square one.

    What follows is yet more judging the performance. It’s only futile if she wants it to be, but it is pretty clear to me that she does.

    The one mistake I think he’s making, especially in light of Tasmin’s observation, is that he’s walking on eggshells based on the worst behavior of women he’s pursued in the past (such as the girl insulting him at the bar), instead of assuming that if Connor is worthwhile, she won’t be that way. It is a difficult transition to make, especially when all she’s bringing are shit tests and performance judgements.

    * the best way to learn something is to get it wrong, then figure out why it was wrong and how to fix it, even better than getting it right the first time. When I share this with my students, it really helps them open up to taking risks and to stop mocking one another/fearing the mocking.

  • Desiderius

    Susan,

    “In short, he overcame considerable physical and character advantages to ensure failure by being a total pussy.”

    I’m the one being too hard?

    Mmmkay.

  • Sassy6519

    SayWhaat and Sassy6519:

    When men leave you, do they typically leave to be alone, or do they leave you to be with other women?

    If it is the former, you might want to ask yourself what made them think they were better off alone. If it is the latter, then they were probably not the “invisible” men I am talking about. Unfortunately, these men have very few options and will stick like superglue to any woman who continues to give him half as much kindness and sex as he deserves. I know this because I used to be a shy guy, and I used to have a good heart.

    Here are my experiences.

    I have been in a few relationships (4), and half of them I broke up with the guy while the other half I was broken up with.

    1. About two years ago, one of the guys I was dating was very nice nice to me, but he slipped up and told me that he had a wife when he was somewhat drunk one night. I left him that night and never looked back. Luckily, I never slept with him because I wait awhile to smoke the guy out, and that practice worked in this case.

    2. I broke up with my most recent boyfriend about 2 1/2 months ago. I thought he was the perfect catch. We dated for 9 months. He was perfect for the first 3 months, then his attitude slowly soured over time. I expressed to him many times about the dissatisfaction I felt, and he promised me to change, but he never did. I wised up and pulled the plug. I realized that even though I loved him very much, I loved myself more an wouldn’t put up with disrespect.

    3. The guy I was dating (around 3 months) before my last boyfriend broke up with me by saying, “I don’t think we are romantically compatible”. I was hurt, but I moved on. I definitely think the real issue was that he was very insecure about himself. He was kind of chubby and not classically handsome, but I liked him. He, however, always wondered “why someone like me would be interested in someone like him” or “whether I would leave him for someone better”. He was extremely jealous of any other man who would so much as look at me. I pretty much dodged a bullet there.

    4. My first real boyfriend was in college. He was in a fraternity, but he wasn’t the typical frat guy. He was very sweet to me and I enjoyed his company. The problem was that I was still a virgin at the time and I wasn’t ready to sleep with him when he wanted me to. I guess he didn’t want to wait for me. At the fraternity’s Christmas party, I found him making out with a girl upstairs and she was topless. He didn’t know I saw him, so I walked out of that party without saying a word. He called me after a few days to let me know that he thought “we were better off as friends”. I didn’t care at that point.

    As to whether or not they were alone or with someone after the relationships ended, I don’t know and I don’t care. What they did with themselves is irrelevant to me. I just want a guy to be who he says he is. If he acts sweet and nice in the beginning, I want him to stay that way.

  • SayWhaat

    When men leave you, do they typically leave to be alone, or do they leave you to be with other women?

    My experiences:

    1. Ex-Fake Boyfriend was sweet and wonderful in the beginning, but after dating for a month and a half, he decided that he didn’t want to be in a relationship (citing that he was still messed up from his previous one). We were right at that point where sex was the next step after commitment. I was crushed but as I found out later in the year, he had serious issues (prescription drug abuse, threesome with his female roommate and a random guy in Berlin) and turned out to be a really shitty person (not only did he end things very immaturely and passive-aggressively, I found out that he told people we were doing things we never did in inappropriate places). A relationship was clearly not for him. As far as I know, he is still single, though I could give less of a flying fuck.

    2. I met Brooklyn Dude on OKCupid. We dated for a month, I told him I was a virgin, he freaked out. The next week I didn’t hear from him, the week after that he told me he didn’t want a relationship. Last I checked, his account was deleted/deactivated. No idea if there was another woman involved, and I don’t care.

    3. Met Urban Planner guy on OKCupid as well. Dated for a month, I told him I was a virgin and he said he was cool with that. Two weeks later he stopped responding to my texts. Maybe it was more of a compatibility issue, because I wasn’t really too bummed about it. Still rude. No idea if there was another woman involved, and I don’t care.

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    @SayWhaat

    Wow. At first it seems like “I’m a virgin” is the worst thing you could say . . . but in another sense, it’s the best thing you could say!

  • SayWhaat

    Bellita,

    I’m not so sure. Urban Planner and Brooklyn Dude were genuinely good guys (remember, Brooklyn Dude at least texted me to tell me it was over, instead of leaving me hanging). These are guys who would probably make wonderful boyfriends for other girls, but because of my virginity, they were taking themselves out of the running. No one wants to be the guy who crushed my heart and soul because he was my first, in the eventuality that things didn’t work out. If only they knew I’m a seasoned veteran. :P

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    @SayWhaat

    Perhaps it was just too early in the dating stage to tell them? (On another thread, someone wasn’t too impressed when I said that I told a guy on the first date that I hoped to adopt special needs children someday. I still don’t see why that’s a bad thing to say, though.) But I can understand why you’d want to be upfront about virginity as early as possible and wouldn’t really advise you to change your strategy. (Then again, I’m hardly one to take advice from!)

  • allie

    “Wow. At first it seems like “I’m a virgin” is the worst thing you could say . . . but in another sense, it’s the best thing you could say!”

    – Yup I always wonder when to drop that into conversation…

  • SayWhaat

    Perhaps it was just too early in the dating stage to tell them?

    I don’t really have the leisure of time to tell them later in the dating stage, they lose interest if you don’t explain why you aren’t having sex with them by date 5 at the latest.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    SayWhaat, you might be giving the impression that a relationship with you would be a sexless relationship. That impression has the advantage of quickly filtering out players, but it would filter out normal guys too.

    If a kind-hearted male friend of mine was thinking about dating a professed virgin, I would advise him against it unless she is under 25 or very religious. If she is very religious, then he would need to be the same. Otherwise, he would have to be a very unusual (not in a good way) or a very naive person to want to date her.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    In case I end up dating again, I am getting nervous that there are a bunch of lifetime virgins out there. Allie and SayWhaat, I hope you are both very young.

  • SayWhaat

    SayWhaat, you might be giving the impression that a relationship with you would be a sexless relationship.

    Yes, this is totally reasonable and expected given that the conversation was preceded by heavy passionate makeout sessions on previous dates and other fun stuff just steps away from intercourse. It’s also understandable for them to think that after I tell them it’s all theirs, if I can call them my boyfriend. /sarcasm

    I know where you’re coming from but I’ve had a few guys tell me that I exude a barely-restrained sexuality, so I find it a little preposterous that they would think our relationship would be sexless. ESPECIALLY if we’ve already been getting hot and heavy beforehand.

    I’ll be 22 in a few weeks. But I think it’s kind of offensive that you’re afraid of “lifetime virgins”. There’s nothing wrong with that, barring religious reasons it’s entirely possible they just haven’t had a chance. Tina Fey was a virgin until she was 24, I didn’t even kiss a guy until I was a sophomore in college….really, this sort of thinking is only harmful to both sides in the SMP. It’s probably this same attitude that led you to where you are now, just putting it out there.

    But whatever, to each his own.

  • Turning to the Dark Side

    Nothing strange about being a virgin at 21 or 22. Also nothing wrong with waiting until you find the right person.

  • allie

    Yep just 21 and waiting for the right person. It’s been harder then I thought.

  • Anacaona

    Okay given that I’m the virgin that could :p I can tell you guys, you are going to meet all the wrong guys first till you meet the right one is as simple as that. Like you my virginity was Top Secret, I spent many years alone (10), and m any men doing those things you mention flaking, lying, dissapearing…With my husband all was very natural, slow and patient (although I most say that he told later that when I commented I was a virgin “Another one!!?” it seems that he has a magnets for virgins so for him is not funny anymore it t also meant that he didn’t treated me like an alien for it, he asked me why? If I was planning to wait till marriage and all that. Found that my reasons made sense and surely kept me a virgin at the ancient age of 27.

    I think the advice of dating a bit older is good, they might had meet other virgins and not freak out so much over it. I will recommend four years older since is my parents, his parents and mine difference so it seems like the magic number. In SayWhat case she needs to move to a better market not sure about Allie but really if a man never dated a virgin before he might have all the prejudices that mainstream has around it “she hates sex, she is clingy, she is lying, she is a prude, she is cold in bed and so on”  is not easy to be a virgin, when you find the man that will stick around it will very likely be worth it. *hugs*

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    @SayWhaat

    But I think it’s kind of offensive that you’re afraid of “lifetime virgins”. There’s nothing wrong with that, barring religious reasons it’s entirely possible they just haven’t had a chance.

    You think that was an offensive way to put it? Athol Kay once said of virginity, “Gone on over long it starts to have a bad odor all it’s own.”

    Of course, it’s just an exaggeration, but it shows us exactly what we’re dealing with. It got me to musing on my blog that virgins over 25 are hardly better off in the dating market than women with two-digit partner counts.

  • Desiderius

    Bellita,

    For virginity to work in your favor, it has to be about what you’re doing rather than what you’re not.

  • Desiderius

    Susan,

    ‘I hesitate to report, because I think you’ll be to hard on her.’

    I feel like we’re Ward and June discussing how to properly discipline the Beav. The divide is likely as much generational and gender-based though. The generous/optimistic spirit of Boomers like you is what enables you to reach out in understanding to the struggles of men on the first place, so I may well be asking you to do something that just isn’t in your nature.

    Look, I’m in the same boat. I adore my 23-year-old sister so much that I’m afraid to tell her anything lest I say the wrong thing or in the wrong way and damage our relationship. So I go along to get along. But she needs to get some good guidance from someone. What is actually hard on her is the messages she gets from the culture, and from my feminist mom who is encouraging her to wait out the peak of her sexual power without taking advantage of it.

    It’s the difference between the ant and the grasshopper.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @Desiderius

      I feel like we’re Ward and June discussing how to properly discipline the Beav. The divide is likely as much generational and gender-based though. The generous/optimistic spirit of Boomers like you is what enables you to reach out in understanding to the struggles of men on the first place, so I may well be asking you to do something that just isn’t in your nature

      Haha, yeah, I think so too. I think there’s also a tendency on my part to defend the female when that’s lacking in the comments. That story brought out a ton of beta guys lending insight to Adam’s frame of mind, which was incredibly interesting and valuable. But there weren’t many women commenting on that thread about what Connor might be experiencing, so I dug in more than usual.

      I also am aware of the limitations of a forum like this, where we’re getting the story from one party, we don’t have all the details, etc. From my perspective, Adam didn’t deliver in the end, despite considerable encouragement. I do believe he likes (or liked) Connor, but she really tried to meet him halfway, IMO. Certainly, proposing meeting for decorating advice and a drink to follow counts as her making a move. (For the record, the drink was not gratuitous – she playfully suggested that she come over and give him some ideas about the apartment, and he could buy her a beer afterwards in return.) He didn’t say yes to that, he delayed two weeks and then met up with her late night in a bar. She truly cannot figure it out – but whatever it is, it doesn’t feel like interest. Mostly she said that at this point, it doesn’t seem remotely possible that they would ever go on a date. She hasn’t heard from him since that meetup. I think he’s got some issues, frankly. Whether it’s crippling shyness, or what, I don’t know. But if he likes her, he could have been in a relationship by now. Instead, he fails to follow up, gets in touch monthly via text. He meets all the criteria for “he’s just not that into you.” If that is not his intention, he desperately needs Game, I don’t care how handsome he is.

  • SayWhaat

    It got me to musing on my blog that virgins over 25 are hardly better off in the dating market than women with two-digit partner counts.

    I was thinking the same thing recently. Virgins and sluts are two sides of the same coin. Men would prefer to deal with neither.

  • SayWhaat

    Athol Kay once said of virginity, “Gone on over long it starts to have a bad odor all it’s own.”

    That’s rather rich of him, considering he waited until he and his wife waited until they were engaged.

  • http://bloggingbellita.wordpress.com Bellita

    @SayWhaat

    This tangent has reminded me of a college friend for whom relationship experience was very important. She preferred to date only guys with an ex-girlfriend count in the same ballpark as her own ex-boyfriend count. Her reasoning was that people “practice” on each other before finding the one they actually want to settle down with, and that she didn’t want to be with someone who had had less practice than she had and whom she’d have to show the ropes.

    (If you’re interested, my latest post is all about her outlook on relationships. It’s linked right under this comment.)

  • jrc

    Just hoping to give a little encouragement to Turning to the Dark Side.

    I’ve been reading manosphere stuff for almost two years now. I’ve seen some things in my wife of 15 years that appear to fall in line with the negative side of the “red pill”. I’ve gotten angry and bitter at times. I’m still not past some of it. Due to religious beliefs, I will not accept all of it at face value. I prefer the mutual respect version and that we’re all corrupted to some degree and will be tempted by things that are not good for us. We have to work and discipline ourselves to overcome the corruption that will poison us if left unchecked. In addition, I’ve consistently read that the fear of loss is more motivating than the desire for gain. But living in fear is not healthy for anyone and will poison a relationship. I believe intentionally creating an atmosphere of fear will also poison the one dishing it out.

    Anyway, I tried expressing affection and love with non-sexual touching and romantic words for a couple of months a couple years ago and got nowhere (beta pedastalizing?). However, after reaching a low point emotionally this year during a fight about sexual and relational issues, my wife broke down and said she wanted a divorce. She was very upset, just completely emotionally broken. She did not lash out or act bitchy, just broken. Since I loved her, my heart broke for her, and I wanted to ease her pain more than my own. So I decided I would just try to meet her needs in the areas I’ve heard her express sincere concerns about. That night I just sat next to her on the sofa and watched a sit-com with her while occasionally rubbing her feet. The next day I had a positive, giving attitude. I called her once or twice during work. After work, I took care of the dishes and cleaned up the living room a bit. She looked exhausted (stay at home mom with two little kids, one adhd, that also homeschools), so I told her I would take care of everything during the kids’ bathtime and she could just rest. She offered to help a little, but I told her no. I would take care of everything. I was not expecting to get any sex or even any significant affection in return. That night after showers, she was on the bed in a thong wiggling her butt in the air saying “my ass is lonely”. It was one of the best nights of sex in our marriage. Felt like real love-making with passion. Maybe I was being kind in an alpha way. Maybe I had been lacking in giving in some real areas. Maybe I was giving from a position of strength or a source of abundance. I don’t know if it was a temporary response to the endless courtship fantasy that Dalrock wrote about. I don’t know if I can maintain such a strong source of giving emotionally. We still have some issues and have had a few bad relapses. But I was the opposite of being a jerk/asshole, and she responded lightning quick in a deeply emotionally satisfying way. Since then she has said that she has felt in-love feelings for me again after a long time without. She was so happy to feel that way again that she almost cried.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      @jrc
      Wow, thanks for sharing your story. I know it was meant for Dark Side, but it gave me goosebumps. It sounds like she was completely overwhelmed and felt taken for granted at home. Your pitching in that way was very empathic, and obviously exactly what she needed. I wonder how this fits into Athol Kay’s framework. Perhaps she was in need of beta traits that were not pedestalizing?

  • Daniel

    Normal
    0

    false
    false
    false

    EN-US
    X-NONE
    X-NONE

    MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:””;
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0in;
    mso-para-margin-right:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0in;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
    mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
    mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

    It is amazing how much I can relate to what these men are saying. I tried casual sex before and it didn’t turn out as much as I imagined it to be. Sure it looks cool and pleasurable in tv and from people’s stories but still there is something missing that can only be found in meaningful and sincere sex with my partner. I really like the topic and I feel that I learned a lot.

  • Desiderius

    Susan,

    “Perhaps she was in need of beta traits that were not pedestalizing?”

    Only when we get to different words for Light Triad on the one hand and anti-game on the other (instead of “beta” for both) will we get somewhere on these questions.

    The fact that he did all those things for her pleasure (more like relief) instead of seeking approval for himself (i.e. he did them out of selflessness, anti-narcissism) account for her positive response.

    It is the cynicism and naivete of young women with options who don’t know men or the particular man very well that leads her to conflate the two.

    Confusing following the rules with herb emasculation (by labeling both “beta”) has a more damaging effect still – it teaches young men and women that the rules themselves require emasculation.

  • Doug1

    I think the Like Casual and Like FWB rows should be added together – both involve lack of serious emotional commitment and non monogamous freedom to have sex with others.   Doing that the ration is 12:9 guys to girls like casual/fwb.   I also think the cell for disliking casual is inflated (and the male casual/fwb cells deflated) by all the betas who can’t get casual/fwb with girls of their own SMV or one lower) and who feel better about themselves when the represent that they don’t want it anyway, it’s wrong, etc.   Girls 5 or even 4 and up in contrast can generally get casual/fwb with guys 2 or even 3 SMV notches higher, so this lying to themselves to feel better factor isn’t operable in the same way.

  • Ian

    Emotion means “moved by something”, Hormone means “impetus”. Have sex without the pleasurable feeling that was designed to move you into sexual relationships (temporarily, albeit) is like walking on one leg.  Even “no-strings” adulterous affairs, have an emotional charge and a purpose. Same goes for co-workers, vacations, summer flings.

    But, club sex,  “I don’t particularly like you, but you’re here” sex is junk food.

    There’s a quasi-science parable passing around the internet, a study that showed putting a critical mass of dysfunctional cats in a group taught the healthy cats to act sick. Focusing on hyper-partnering is paying too much attention to the retards in the room – the narcissists (myself included) and women with Daddy issues..

    There’s validity to Alphaism’s (and Dark Triad’s) attractiveness, Maternal Man’s unattractiveness, and Maternal society’s damned-poor indoctrination for relationship success. That said, I think that all a typical guy has to do to have functional relationships is to be functional – interact with society comfortably, exercise and eat well, drop the baggage, and be good at something.

     

     

  • hcggold.com

    Hello there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be okay. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look
    forward to new updates.

    • http://www.hookingupsmart.com Susan Walsh

      Yes, there’s a Twitter symbol in the right sidebar of the blog. I confess I’m not very active though…

  • http://theteeth.net/ http://theteeth.net/

    Howdy! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using
    for this site? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve
    had issues with hackers and I’m looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.